Thanks, still haven't quite figured out how to translate archives, working on it though.

Thank you @Anonj456. I will remove the 24hr Grace flair.

I am Swedish so I understood the article from Världens Gång. Well done Norge!

@Vindicator

Yeah, it's a little dense.

So the idea is that in a media market people have a choice between downloading something for free or paying for it. They are going to weigh the cost vs benefit. People are comparing the value of having gotten it by torrent or paying vs the risk and money of using torrent or paying. This is true for all media markets.

So we say that someone pays if:
CV/(P+CR) > FV/FR

C means commercial, V means value (what they get out of it), P means price, R means risk, and F means non-commercial.

P+CR is what someone pays for a commercial interaction. If purchasing music obviously there is no risk, so P+CR=P. But in the case of something illicit then the CR is a part of the cost. So if you get more bang for the buck for a commercial interaction you will pursue a commercial interaction.

Well on the other side of the inequality we see FV/FR. That will have an infinite bang for buck in all cases if the FR is zero. That means no one will ever engage in a commercial interaction. Another way of saying this is the P necessary to satisfy the inequality would have to be less than zero. That P becomes the demand curve, because a demand curve is asking at what price would someone pay for something.

So that's the main point but I can derive that formula for you really quick if you want to read on.

So there is one more condition of there being a commercial interaction that we need to factor in.

CV>CR+P

That is if a commercial interaction has less value than its cost it obviously won't happen independent of what is going on with FV/FR.

So lets combine these two facts to solve for P.

P<CV-CR
P< CV*FR/FV-CR

So maximum P that anyone will pay is less than both of those figures on the right.

P_max=min(CV-CR,CV*FR/FV-CR) which we will now call D because we have a demand curve.

So that min statement is kind of complicated but we can simplify it.

First off we have a -CR in both cases.

D = min(CV,CV*FR/FV)-CR

Now we have a CV in both

D = CV*min(1,FR/FV)-CR

So obviously different people see different value in each kind of interaction and different risk. So each variable is a distribution. But the important thing is that if the FR distribution is universally zero then the demand curve is universally zero. Also what is interesting is no amount of CR will offset the effect of even the tiniest amount of FR, because of the effect of subtracting a distribution form a distribution vs the multiplication of a distribution with anything beside zero.

Also what is interesting is that cap of 1 on FR/FV. Basically what this says is that a media market cannot exceed a conventional market. If FR/FV were infinite basically you would just have a conventional market. This is of course what most media companies would like to achieve. You can't download a toothbrush and if FR/FV were infinite people would have to buy music like it were a toothbrush. One purchase for every instance out there.

But oddly the anti-cp laws are trying to achieve the same FR/FV ratio.

It might of worked...but with the agenda of the deep state ..to keep the debt system expanding , sexualisation is a necessity for them... The food that is hormone charged ...and carefully crafted media programs...programs humans to be androud bots chasing desires... An android would work for.pittance if he gets his fix of cheap sex drugs and rock and roll at the end of hia working hours or weekend.. Sex Drug ..Rock and Roll.. ie .SDR's for the consumption of the debt droids..that creates the account receivables forncompanies that r securitised at the investmnet banks backed by US treasury bills via a technique called collateral transformation ..The GDP creates SDRs for the country at the BIS country accounts in Geneva

..SDRs programmed at the local level drive SDRs at the Bank of International Settlements.

Collateralntransformation is when an investment bank loans trasury bills to hedge funds in exchange for high interest corpirate bonds These corporate bonds are driven by the amount of account receivables it can securitise and service these corporate bonds..

Oh wow, I would love to read more about this. Since you said you're sure it was scrapped (I'm sure you're right), have you looked into whether any phase of this study has been documented online? I'm very interested in the polygraph aspects/results. The only thing cruel about this is the use of CP in the treatment, which is necessary for this study/treatment of an addict/offender. I hate how things can be turned around into "cruel and unusual punishment" in terms of the abuser or potential abuser.

Behavior Modification is a doubled edged sword. Pedophilia is as curable as any "successful" ritual abuse survivors.

Notice I mentioned "successful". If programed abuse is successful then only chemical enslavement is the cure. As soon as a young impressionable mind breaks, impulse control becomes permanently damaged and will NEVER return until rebirth.

That's interesting, I do wonder if something like that could work. I remember reading an account of an alcoholic who underwent a similar treatment, where he was made to puke after ingesting alcohol. His was quite a severe case of addiction; he had lost his family, house, job, and everything else. Well, it turns out that the treatment worked at first for him, but because he already knew that drinking would not do that normally and because the itch for alcohol never actually left (it had only been one or two weeks of inpatient sobriety) he quickly entered back into the addiction.

Years later, after hitting "rock bottom" (not sure what that really means but he said it was key; some kind of place of humility maybe?) he was able to recover completely and has a new family and a new life. Through religion, twelve steps, hitting "rock bottom" and giving his life to God (somehow), he was able to make a return. So this was his account anyway

That sounds very A Clockwork Orange-y

Any links on that surgery topic?

I personally think it's the Jesuits and Vatican who are controlling world events, with a secret doctrine of Luciferianism overlayed by a false Christianity. But I could be wrong.

Also, I didn't know porn used to be illegal. Yes, I agree it should always have stayed that way.