This applies to Pizzagate as the organization and $ supports the Elite international religious/political group the Muslim Brotherhood
At least 1,400 white Dutch girls are sex-trafficked every year by nonwhite “immigrants” from Morocco, Turkey, the Caribbean and Gypsies from Eastern Europe, police in the Netherlands have admitted.
News of the scandal has emerged after a joint peroration between police and “Watch Nederland,” one of the Dutch government’s Department of Social Welfare organizations, the Center against Child Abuse and Human Trafficking (“Centrum tegen Kinderhandel en Mensenhandel”) was reported by the Dutch newspaper Algemeen Dagblad.
The investigation showed that the nonwhites first groom the girls to be their sexual partners, and then film themselves having sex with the girls. The videos are then used as blackmail – if the girl doesn’t agree to become a prostitute, then the video of the girl having sex is released on social media.
Police specialists in human trafficking, Marijke van Overveld and Esmee Huijps, told the Alegemeen Dagblad that the traffickers are “Moroccans, Turks, Antilleans and Roma.”
Immigrants from the Antilles come from the “Netherlands Antilles,” a number of islands in the Caribbean Sea located due north of the South American coast. Most of the nonwhites there are descendants of black slaves imported during the 17th and 18th centuries.
Many of the girls being abused are in the Dutch social care system or come from run down housing estates, which is a situation very similar to that in the UK where nonwhite gangs also engage in the same practice.
It is believed a trafficker can earn up to €800 a day pimping out a Dutch girl, who is usually kept against her will in a suburban apartment, or even in a garden shed. The traffickers use adverts on secret chat groups on social media to bring in new customers.
Recent figures shows that only one out of every ten abused girls receives any help from authorities, and so teachers, doctors and community leaders are being trained to spot the signs of grooming in their local jurisdiction.
The Netherlands has very liberal laws when it comes to sex; the country is famous for its sex tourism and red light districts, and the country has very relaxed attitudes to casual sex amongst teenagers, something which has caused STI rates in the country to soar and puts girls at risk from adults who pose as teenagers.
Laws made it difficult to prosecute grooming gangs in the past, with several high profile cases collapsing because the gangs used legal loopholes to avoid a conviction. However in recent years the laws have been tightened and conviction rates are increasing.
Authorities in the Netherlands are now starting to crackdown on the grooming of girls, with fake ads being placed by anti-trafficking organisations which lure criminals into a trap. They are then arrested by the police and prosecuted.
Police in the Netherlands revealed that the profits from the pimping out of underage girls are used to fund greater criminal operations abroad, and are also used to fund Islamist networks across the world, including the Muslim Brotherhood and Chechen terrorist organizations.
view the rest of the comments →
Vindicator ago
@Nomochomo, just a heads up: you really should cite the original PG researcher when reposting them.
The Search field is right at the top of the sidebar so you never need to
forum slideduplicate post.NOMOCHOMO ago
My bad, I somehow missed it. Do you suggest I delete?
Vindicator ago
Think-'s submission was one showing the mainstream media were picking up the story. Yours did not. That makes a it a follow up thread. Different sources were cited.
In this thread, @Shadow332 made an excellent, detailed research post, and you simply reposted the same source, adding nothing.
And yes, this does look like @Crensch was right.
NOMOCHOMO ago
Yes I did. I linked the UK newspaper The Mirror, which proves the mainstream media picked it up "a fortnight ago"
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2840647/14930967
@vindicator "That makes a it a follow up thread"
If it's a follow up thread, why didn't @think- cite the "original PG researcher"?
I immediately admitted mine was an accidental duplicate. And prefaced it with "I haven't seen this posted here"
Vindicator ago
Why would Shadow tag you in his original research?
Probably because she didn't want to legitimize an unknown account who showed up immediately after our biggest shill burned his main account, though supposedly "new", dumped six massive threads on the board at once with titles matching a known disinfo narrative, has a habit of mentioning the same obscure topics as the proven deceiver Esoteric, and has repeatedly behaved in a manner that feeds the careworn "mods are censoring" shill mantra.
NOMOCHOMO ago
He shouldn't. I'm pointing out the distinction. I didn't know about the previous post, while @think- clearly did. I made a mistake, think- intentionally didn't cite the original researcher. I did it unknowingly, @think- did it on purpose.
We are all unknown accounts until/unless we meet in real life. You're prioritizing old accounts, rather than moderating impartially and holding all users to the same standard. You justify @think- not citing the original researcher but criticize others.
Is it known disinfo because Esotericshade pushed it? All posts related to blood consumption are "disinfo"? Seems like you let him poison a well and then blame the water.
Could you please explain that? My posts were upvoted, so I'm a shill?
So any criticism of mods makes a user shill? Sorry your highness, but ya'll make mistakes like all of us. I admitted mine.
Backpage sex trafficking Emoji codes are an obscure topic?