https://altnewsmedia.net/general/the-informed-choices-of-young-girls/
"Nazir Afzal is a former Chief Prosecutor for North West England. He was interviewed very briefly on the Radio 4 PM programme on 19th October. In the interview he made a quite astonishing claim which does not seem to have received the publicity it deserves so we thought it worth publicizing here. He said (@34minutes):
“You may not know this, but … back in 2008 the Home office sent a circular to all police forces in the country saying “as far as these young girls who are being exploited in towns and cities, we believe they have made an informed choice about their sexual behaviour and therefore it is not for you police officers to get involved in.”
Although we do not have the full text of the circular, this description seems to strongly suggest that it was a blanket instruction which did not contain any reference to the girls’ ages. If so this is direct evidence of the UK government of that time at the very least condoning statutory rape of children and really giving the green light to the police to ignore far worse crimes. In other words, police inaction in these cases was a deliberate policy and the instruction came directly from the then Labour government.
view the rest of the comments →
NoRoyalty ago
Oh my God. I want Russia to blow London off the map.
BeTidy ago
While Russia under Putin has done some very good things on the world stage, including getting a UN resolution passed protecting the "traditional family values of nation states" (or words to that effect, which "western" nations opposed but passed anyway). Russia has very similar elites running it to the US/UK etc. Cold War 1 was completely fake (see Anthony Sutton's book on who funded the Bolsheviks to power - he also lists the names of directors of the companies doing the funding, which makes it very clear.). Solzhenitsyn points out exactly who the Bolsheviks were. It wasn't a "Russian" revolution, which was why the Jewish Bolsheviks were happy to slaughter the entire Russian leadership, all funded from the west, particularly the US.
Cromwell's revolution was very much along a simliar line, just not as bloody. Check out Jan Irwin's channel Logos Media on Youtube for some recent videos on who the Puritans were (key to the English revolution, and not Christian as it turns out, easy to verify for yourself).
Essentially, you have three empires with the same ethnic group running the show in the end. British, American and Soviet. They weren't the only ones either. There is a very interesting book on who the Young Turks and Attaturk were. Again, a crypto Jewish revolution. Similar to our colour revolutions run by the US and EU today.
Note that the Oligarchs of Russia today, were the commisars of the past. The first 5 year plan for the Soviets was created by a unit of Harvard Uni. That same unit was the architect of Perestroika and Russia's asset sales to insiders. That same unit also was involved in the asset sales fraud in NZ (American academic Michael Porter was part of that unit) which perhaps was a trial run for the Soviet Union's asset sales program. The same propaganda was used in both countries with regard to selling off "sunset industries" like oil, gas, coal, telecommunications, rail, steel, basically anything of value that could be stolen.
The point is. Russia is run by the same group that runs the US and UK. Has the Russian branch had a change of heart? I hope so. It would be wonderful if Putin had a genuine love of his people, and they certainly love him for taking the boot off their throats. He has done great things for Russia. But is it genuine? It's actually hard to know. Is Cold War 2 genuine? Again, it's hard to know. I hope so... but Russia's leadership put another nation ahead of the one they control.
NoRoyalty ago
Damned if you do and damned if you don't. You are one heck of a historian. I stand firm in my conviction that all royalty should be exterminated. And we the people must fight fight fight.