You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

ESOTERICshade ago

The intention is to muddle the verifiable connections and incriminating information with the ever-growing catch-all beast that is now PizzaGate. It does not take a genius or historian to know that the government’s first move in trying to control anything is to infiltrate and lead it. As was seen in the Occupy movement, and many others, that were no doubt filled with genuine individuals, yet was led into irrelevance, from the top, by the FBI.

As this investigation moves forward we must be cognizant of the very real danger this potential infiltration may pose, and likely already does. We must stay focused on the true culprits and not on the surrounding distractions and created in-fighting that is designed to pit a movement against itself, thereby proving that the movement was never serious to begin with, hence, cannot be trusted.

Ding Ding Ding. Qanon anybody? Probably 99% of the Q posts are not pizzagate related but SOMEHOW Q is magically inherently related to pizzagate? Not its not. Q has slowly and carefully morphed into a mainstream news parrot and not much more.


We all know that anything that comes from the mainstream news is coming from the CIA, both FOX and CNN. So why would smart redpilled people waste their brain cells on it?


Pizzagate became a big thing because we created OUR OWN NARRATIVE. We didn't follow, we led, and they couldn't stop us or control us. That unique property of creating our own narrative is in jeopardy if we let this sub be led by Q and the mainstream news narrative.

Let the down votes begin.......

WhenEveMetEnki ago

I'd upvoat if I could, spot on as usual, ES.

ESOTERICshade ago

Are you a new member or an old member with a new account?

WhenEveMetEnki ago

A bit of both, but to answer your underlying question, I am in in no way credible and you should assume as with anyone else that I'm more likely a shill than what only I know myself to be: (TL;DR) A longtime lurker and for the most part someone who's not seen any reason to interject in the conversation, since I rarely have anything to contribute.

I'm only joining the conversation now because it dawned on me that the same is true for probably 99% of us that care & are paying attention to this stuff, and I've noticed more and more lately that that thinking makes for a conversation involving mostly shills and people with alterior motives, and that if we don't participate we can't really even be mad that the majority of what we read is idiotic partisan bullshit at best and straight-up propaganda and disinformation at worst.

ESOTERICshade ago

Sounds reasonable.