https://thegoldwater(com)com/news/36374-Ohio-Parents-Upset-Over-Morality-Quiz-Given-to-Students-Suggesting-Incest
Parents got upset with an online activity a teacher assigned her students in a school in Hillard, Ohio regarding a “Moral Foundations Test.” Some parents strongly disagreed with the activity, and as a result of their protests and reactions, the concerned teacher who gave the online quiz has been placed on administrative leave.
The Hilliard Bradley school district admitted on Thursday that the said contentious activity “should never have taken place.”
The free quiz was used to establish the moral or political leaning of students and includes 36 questions. Certain scenarios were given and quiz takers are asked to choose from a series of “thumbs up” or “thumbs down” to describe how okay is each situation to them.
Some of the questions are harmless and inoffensive enough like “Man sets up an unlicensed medical practice, but makes all of his customers sign a contract acknowledging that he is not a licensed physician.”
Others are outrageously upsetting to parents and should not be asked of children. One of the scenarios posed suggested the taboo topic of incest:
“Using both a condom and a pill, a brother and a sister decide they want to sleep with each other- just once, to see what it would be like.”
Another suggests animal cruelty with the scenario:
“Sarah’s dog has four puppies. She can only find a home for two of them, so she kills the other two with a stone to the head.”
And yet another on sex dolls with the scenario: “A man orders a custom-built sex doll designed to look just like his niece.”
It is no wonder then that the parents got upset, apparently the question on incest really caught their ire.
Parent Ellen Mrochek said: “Oh, my gosh!OK– OK! No! I would absolutely not let my college son… that’s no!”
Chris Chaffin also reacted and said: “That’s just sick! Sick!”
Todd Sandberg, the father of a 10th-grader who was given the test said that he may concede that the questions might be appropriate in a college-level philosophy class, but not to 15-year-olds in a Language Arts Class.
The district is already conducting an internal investigation into the matter. They also released a statement describing the activity an “isolated case.” They also added: “We absolutely share the outrage of our parents and community.”
If I was a parent, I would have a hard time keeping my hands off the neck of that teacher. Has this teacher done other things that were not appropriate for this age group? Idk, we've seen this movie before. I am starting to think that certain teachers may be hired for the sole purpose of testing the waters. Are they trying to find out if their Normalization Tactics are working? Idk, this just seems a really sneaky situation, inserting it in the Language Arts Class. Hmm, let's see now, where and how can I sneak this in?
view the rest of the comments →
septimasexta ago
Modern globalist infiltration of our public schools began after WW2 during a meeting of the American Psychological Association:
"Following the 1948 Convention of the American Psychological Association, B.S. Bloom took a lead in formulating a classification of "the goals of the educational process". Three "domains" of educational activities were identified. The first of these, named the Cognitive Domain, involves knowledge and the development of intellectual attitudes and skills. The other domains are the Affective Domain and the Psychomotor Domain, which are usually not addressed by goals specified in a corrosion course. Eventually, Bloom and his co-workers established a hierarchy of educational objectives, which is generally referred to as Bloom's Taxonomy, and which divides cognitive objectives ranging from the simplest behavior to the most complex."
Dr. Benjamin Bloom, educational psychologist and son of Russian Jewish immigrants (like Sergey Brin), brought in the plan to use Communist style indoctrination in U.S. schools through changing the definition of academic testing to "assessments" - a tool to control curriculum and thought. The plan was laid out in two books edited by Bloom: The Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Cognitive Domain, and Part 2, The Affective Domain. This system underlies all educational "assessments" and has been incorporated into Common Core Curriculum assessments. The main goal is to assess the attitudes, values, and beliefs, of students and to grade them to a GOVERNMENT (globalist) STANDARD. The goal IS NOT educational excellence but MIND CONTROL .
"Benjamin Bloom and his Taxonomies ("modernized" by Marzano and Webb) compared to Karl Marx by Dean Gotcher
Bloom's Taxonomies declared war upon America, i.e., the American traditional family without informing it of its intent. By adding the "affective domain" to the child's classroom experience, the child's "feelings" (and therefore his "thoughts," i.e., opinion) of the 'moment' determined the value or worth of the father's/Father's commands, rules, facts, and truth, negating the father's/Father's authority in the child's feelings, thoughts, and actions, as well as in his relationship with others (questioning, challenging, disregarding, defying, attacking the father/Father and his/His authority). Bloom admitted the "affective domain" was like "Pandora's box," a box full of evils, which once opened could not be closed, causing conflict and tension in the home. "The affective domain [the child's carnal desires of the 'moment'] is, in retrospect, a virtual 'Pandora's Box.'" "There are many stories of the conflict and tension that these new practices are producing between parents and children." (David Krathwohl, Benjamin S. Bloom, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Book 2: Affective Domain)
Weltanschauung1" - "1Cf. Erich Fromm, T. W. Adorno" Bloom admitted that his worldview ("weltanschauung") was that of two Transformational Marxist, i.e., Erich Fromm and Theodor Adorno, who were dedicated to 'liberating' children, and therefore society, from parental authority. " https://www.authorityresearch.com/Articles/Blooms%20Taxonomies%20and%20Karl%20Marx.html
septimasexta ago
"BLOOM'S TAXONOMIES These quotes are from the link, http://authorityresearch.com/2006-06 Bloom's Taxonomy and Marxism.htm#Transformational_Marxists_posing_as_theologians
Dean Gotcher says "Couched in the language of "academia" they are actually the work of Transformational Marxists, using the language of social psychological to communicate to their agents an agenda to destroy the sovereignty of this nation for a dream of a one world order."
"The bottom line of these works is to remove the protestant work ethic and true Christian belief and action from the face of the world. For most readers this already sounds like a conspiracy agenda. They are right. But to refuse to understand a plot against this nation would either mean you do not care what happens to you and your loved ones or you would rather stay ignorant, with the hope that the ignorant win. "Lest Satan should get an advantage of us: for we are not ignorant of his devices." 2 Corinthians 2:11
A Few Quotes From Banjamin Bloom's TAXONOMY- BOOK 2 AFFECTIVE DOMAIN:
""The superego is conceived in psychoanalysis as functioning substantially in the same way as the conscience." p. 39"
My comment: No, Freud's superego is developed from the community, while the conscience of the Christian is to be derived from the authority of God, in his word.
In fact, Transformational Marxism sets out to destroy Christian conscience, so that under this ideology there is no absolute morality." https://christianchat.com/bible-discussion-forum/transformational-marxism-knows-only-the-carnal-mind-and-exalts-it-over-christian-spi.40410/