You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Vindicator ago

I'm glad there has finally been a report on this.

At :58 he says Gritz never knew Moore's last name and that the police called her because she was listed as her next of kin?

Where would that be listed?

EffYouJohnPodesta ago

possibly listed with her DL, if she was in witness protection with a fake name, she would have changed her name on her DL. You can file stuff like that with the DMV and check it off on the back of your license.

Shizy ago

I don't know if they legally change their name with the DMV since that would leave a paper trail of their ID. Wouldn't they just be provided with a new ID and forged documentation of their new identity? Anyway, the DMV can't legally just change the name, they would need a court order.

EffYouJohnPodesta ago

Right, they would get new documents first, then take them to the DMV.

Vindicator ago

What would be the purpose of WitSec if the DMV had your identity? I thought DMV records were public.

EffYouJohnPodesta ago

You legally change your name to a fake name, I assume there is a way to do that secretly somehow and have the court records sealed. DMV would then potentially have your fake name on record with a next of kin, if you file one when you fill out your application. I am not an insider and I've never been in Witness Protection but my ex's step-brother is in it (I recently learned this and found it incredibly disturbing) and has changed his name.

According to George Webb the FBI informant program is much larger than they let on.

I am speculating that that could potentially be an explanation, not saying I know this to be true.

Vindicator ago

With facial recognition, though, all they'd have to do is run your new fake DL against the databases and your cover would be blown.

EffYouJohnPodesta ago

true... I guess the local cops have access to all those databases? You're right, Gritz would probably have access?

Vindicator ago

I don't know if either of them would, but if I were narking on the former Rapist in Chief, I sure as hell wouldn't bet they didn't.

EffYouJohnPodesta ago

yeah, it's important to notice these little details, that's where the cases get completely blown open

Are_we__sure ago

Either Jenny Moore carried something on her person or total speculation a note was left.

Cc1914 ago

YogSoggoth ago

Too busy being real.

SandHog ago

Lol, the very first post on that page and they have no idea who Laura Silsby is. Sad! Although sometimes I kinda wish I didn't know what really goes on in this fucked up world also.

Cc1914 ago

Ha ! I know it’s easier with your head in the sand

carmencita ago

Those people are really asleep. Ho-Hum. It is very evident what their agenda is.

Pizzalawyer ago

Q is getting old Pizzagate research from the Anons. Thats ok, Qs audience is enormous and growing exponentially. Since we are being accused of parenting Q, we may as well ride Qs coattails. The attacks on Q are so ridiculous that people are checking out Q for themselves and they will start seeing the pedophelia and satanist topics and be part of the Great Awakening. We will be validated eventually

Mammy ago

I agree, Pizzalawyer. (Good to see you, btw). It's actually a testament to the veracity and the tenacity of research and researchers on this board that Q is using the info to redpill others. The Great Awakening is nigh.

Pizzalawyer ago

Q just released yesterday a treasure trove of info re the wives of some of these bigwigs in Spygate. They hold very important positions in DC using their maiden names and have been working diligently since Hillary was S of S to protect her and the Clinton Foundation. Rob Rosensteins wife was one of the most surprising disclosures.

flapjack_charlie ago

Q says trust Sessions. Q is NOT real. If you want to use it as a PR avenue, fine, but Q is a larp using half assed cold reading techniques.

Pizzalawyer ago

And same to you Mammy.

Cc1914 ago

Yes I agree !

Cc1914 ago

So many missing pieces.. if she was in the witness protection program as rumored, they may have had all that info .

Vindicator ago

I don't understand why someone in witness protection would be galavanting around making videos with Webb. Do US Marshalls even allow that if they are babysitting you in protective custody to testify against dangerous people in federal investigation? That is hard to believe and defies common sense.

think- ago

I think to look more closely into Jem's claim she was in the Witness Protection Programme is maybe the key to find out whether she was legit or not. And I'm afraid that might be an easy answer. I don't know about the US, but in Britain, when people are in this programme, and get a special training, a new identiy etc. that it is expensive (not for the person in question, but for the taxpayer.... ;-) ).

So walking around with a well known YouTuber, travel with him, go to public places like the Senate etc. is definitely nothing anybody in the WPP would do.

TL;DR: She lied when she said she was in this programme imo.

And somehow I don't believe that Gritz only knew her first name - I mean, come on, this woman was a FBI agent, she worked with MI - and then she has a friend who lives in the US and she is not able to find out her last name? Would be a matter of only two phone calls for somebody like her. Or maybe even only one.

@srayzie @Shizy @Crensch

Shizy ago

I too was looking into the witness protection program as it seems what most people know if it comes from tv! From 1971 until 2013 there were only 8500 people to go through the program. That's less than 300 per year. It's a very very small program designed to protect witnesses who are testifying before, during, and just after a trial. 95% of people who have gone through the program were criminals! Criminals!

I agree with what you said think, going all over town making YouTube ideas with George Webb, talking in videos, and eating lunch everyday among lawmakers in DC is not what you would expect from someone whose life is in danger due to exposing government corruption and in the witness protection program. It's way too much exposure and would put her at risk.

srayzie ago

It’s crossed my mind that she could have been an FBI informant with George Webb, or investigating George Webb. She was too open about telling everyone that she had documents that could get her killed. She used to say it on voat too. She was open about getting on the witness protection program. But, she kept her same Twitter account and one of her tweets that I shared the other day shows him in the picture.

From Dec 15th That’s the day they went to Comet Ping pong. That alone was enough to reveal her identity.

So if she was in the witness protection program, why repeatedly tell us publicly that she was entering the program, then go travel with someone so well known, who records live and says where he’s going before he goes so it would be easy to find her? Why keep the same voat usernames and twitter profiles? Why come back and post on voat using the usernames? Why has George Webb not been killed? He has been exposing the Cabal for over a year right out in the open.

None of this makes sense to me. Especially sharing what I shared the other day as well.

@Vindicator @Think- @Shizy @Gamepwn @MolochHunter

think- ago

Yes, you're absolutely right. Good assessment of the situation. I think she might have been in the same network of intel like Gritz and Webb.

srayzie ago

Maybe they were already friends. 🤓

Are_we__sure ago

The witness protection, the PTSD, the attack, the dead fiancee are all only sourced to her at this point.

Pizzalawyer ago

It makes no sense to me.

Vindicator ago

Do you think maybe Webb/Jenn/Jem are trying to set up Gritz in some way? She apparently had no more actual evidence of Jenny's claims or identity than we did.

think- ago

I don't buy for one minute that Gritz didn't know Jenny's full identiy. An FBI agent, having worked with MI? Totally unlikely.

Vindicator ago

So, you think Gritz lied to One America News? I wonder why she would do that?

Maybe she was trying to protect her, thinking inquiries via FBI channels would be dangerous?

Or are you thinking she was part of Moore's death?

think- ago

I wonder why she would do that?

I have no idea, Vin. But something is not adding up here.

Cc1914 ago

Yes I agree totally , she had ptsd so that may have played a part . People do crazy stuff when they feel brave