This was covered a month or two back. Worth a repeat. It is the double standard - no 13 yo boy is traumatized by a 29 yo woman. Especially not by Cher at 13 yo. Unless they are a fag.
And I'm not patronizing. I'm sure there are some legit cases, but having known hundreds of straight hetero teenage boys growing up, all would have been proud.
Now, there is the new outraged pussified, soyboys like yourself who want to be part of the #poundmetoo movement.
Spare me your fake outrage for your fellow pillowbiters.
having known hundreds of straight hetero teenage boys growing up, all would have been proud
This evidence is even worse than anecdotal evidence. This is like saying that no women would ever stay in an abusive relationship, because mentally healthy women who have never been in an abusive relationship would leave before it became violent. This is like saying that no one ever gets into car accidents because people who aren't driving assume they would react appropriately to hypothetical situations.
Boys who are molested or raped as adolescents might think it wasn't a bad thing at the time, even, but that doesn't mean it doesn't harm them and alter the way their brains work in a way that will negatively impact the rest of their lives. It's not okay to have sex with children.
I don't disagree with your assertions. I am trying to point out the hypocrisy. At the same time I saying there is a societal double standard. Can you acknowledge that?
That's exactly what he's arguing. All of his comments indicate as much. Had he simply left out the
Especially not by Cher at 13 yo. Unless they are a homo.
And not started attacking people because they question him on it, and dance around the fact he wrote what he wrote earlier, no one could find fault with what was written.
I'm merely pointing out how Jewish you are and how you're trying to be subversive. You're still not addressing how your comments come across, but instead would rather focus on how the teens feel. It's irrelevant how a teen would feel - they can't legally consent.
My god, even the way you initially phrased it was to immediately demean someone who would disagree with your sentiment. "derp if you disagree you must be gay". You've been exposed, you dirty, slimey Jew.
Again, you keep not addressing your initial statement. Back peddling and going, "of course I don't condone it" doesn't properly excuse what you wrote. At least you're being consistent with your Jew tactics. It further strengthens my point.
OK @kneo24, before we go any further, we are going to play The Man Game. Because you are a man, aren't you? Not an outraged little bottom on SSRIs, right?
So you get to choose from the following subjects, which you are manliest on, and I get to ask you three questions which must be answered in short order - time hack 0842 ET:
Guns
Cooking
Cars/Trucks
Motorcycles
Any form of vehicle racing
Martial arts
Surely a loud mouth like you knows a little sumptin' sumptin' - bring it tiny boy...
Now you're deflecting and diverting by changing the topic entirely. What's in question is why you chose to frame your original statement the way you did. Keep on Jewing though.
Again, you keep refusing to address your original comment, and you're projecting here. What I know or don't know isn't the issue at hand. You trying to change the topic is just a dirty Jew trick. I don't engage in dirty Jew tricks, I expose them. Keep on exposing yourself, you fucking kike.
The victory was mine when you tried to call me a homo for pointing out how your statement was patronizing to rape victims. You can never take that back. Everyone saw it.
You have yet to address your original comment. You keep diverting and deflecting. Even your response to me pointing out how patronizing it was to rape victims tells us how much foreskin you have on your breath, Mohel.
view the rest of the comments →
Blacksmith21 ago
This was covered a month or two back. Worth a repeat. It is the double standard - no 13 yo boy is traumatized by a 29 yo woman. Especially not by Cher at 13 yo. Unless they are a fag.
kneo24 ago
Way to be patronizing to victims of rape.
Blacksmith21 ago
So you're a homo?
And I'm not patronizing. I'm sure there are some legit cases, but having known hundreds of straight hetero teenage boys growing up, all would have been proud.
Now, there is the new outraged pussified, soyboys like yourself who want to be part of the #poundmetoo movement.
Spare me your fake outrage for your fellow pillowbiters.
NoTrueScotsman ago
This evidence is even worse than anecdotal evidence. This is like saying that no women would ever stay in an abusive relationship, because mentally healthy women who have never been in an abusive relationship would leave before it became violent. This is like saying that no one ever gets into car accidents because people who aren't driving assume they would react appropriately to hypothetical situations.
Boys who are molested or raped as adolescents might think it wasn't a bad thing at the time, even, but that doesn't mean it doesn't harm them and alter the way their brains work in a way that will negatively impact the rest of their lives. It's not okay to have sex with children.
Blacksmith21 ago
I don't disagree with your assertions. I am trying to point out the hypocrisy. At the same time I saying there is a societal double standard. Can you acknowledge that?
NoTrueScotsman ago
There is a societal double standard, but you seem to be arguing that that double standard is acceptable, and that's what I disagree with.
kneo24 ago
That's exactly what he's arguing. All of his comments indicate as much. Had he simply left out the
And not started attacking people because they question him on it, and dance around the fact he wrote what he wrote earlier, no one could find fault with what was written.
Blacksmith21 ago
Spare me your fake outrage dickhead @kneo24 aka @kneeling24x7
@notruescotsman - Let me ask this - have you been a teenaged boy before and are you heterosexual?
I'm not condoning any of this. But teenaged buys will be boys. I don't like it one bit. There are some things in our world which we can't change.
kneo24 ago
I'm merely pointing out how Jewish you are and how you're trying to be subversive. You're still not addressing how your comments come across, but instead would rather focus on how the teens feel. It's irrelevant how a teen would feel - they can't legally consent.
My god, even the way you initially phrased it was to immediately demean someone who would disagree with your sentiment. "derp if you disagree you must be gay". You've been exposed, you dirty, slimey Jew.
Blacksmith21 ago
Thank you for exposing yourself, Nazicuck.
kneo24 ago
Again, you keep not addressing your initial statement. Back peddling and going, "of course I don't condone it" doesn't properly excuse what you wrote. At least you're being consistent with your Jew tactics. It further strengthens my point.
Blacksmith21 ago
Watch kiddies - here's how to expose a Nazishill:
OK @kneo24, before we go any further, we are going to play The Man Game. Because you are a man, aren't you? Not an outraged little bottom on SSRIs, right?
So you get to choose from the following subjects, which you are manliest on, and I get to ask you three questions which must be answered in short order - time hack 0842 ET:
Surely a loud mouth like you knows a little sumptin' sumptin' - bring it tiny boy...
kneo24 ago
Now you're deflecting and diverting by changing the topic entirely. What's in question is why you chose to frame your original statement the way you did. Keep on Jewing though.
Blacksmith21 ago
Nope. I'll answer your questions. If they aren't looney rants. But first you have to prove you are a man. Pick a topic dickbreath.
Blacksmith21 ago
Right there, you lost the argument "boy". Any dude with testicles would've stepped up.
1) You are a chick - which is fine by me
2) You are a "dude" with soft, supple hands that I could crush with my weak hand
3) You are 1 and 2 but your employer's "narrative guide" prohibits you from engaging in "conversations of a personal nature"
@gamepwn
kneo24 ago
Keep on deflecting and diverting from your original comment. I see you're engaging in projection now.
Blacksmith21 ago
And this is where you are wrong. You can't even talk about anything off-narrative. It is VERBOTEN, ya?
[You're too stupid to be AI, FWIW]
kneo24 ago
Again, you keep refusing to address your original comment, and you're projecting here. What I know or don't know isn't the issue at hand. You trying to change the topic is just a dirty Jew trick. I don't engage in dirty Jew tricks, I expose them. Keep on exposing yourself, you fucking kike.
Blacksmith21 ago
Point made. You're a paid shill. G'nIght twinkletoes. I'm about to sign off. You lost.
kneo24 ago
The victory was mine when you tried to call me a homo for pointing out how your statement was patronizing to rape victims. You can never take that back. Everyone saw it.
Blacksmith21 ago
"The victory was mine" - Sorry spermburper - this isn't a videogame. Thank you for exposing yourself. Q is right - y'all really ARE dumb as dogshit.
kneo24 ago
You have yet to address your original comment. You keep diverting and deflecting. Even your response to me pointing out how patronizing it was to rape victims tells us how much foreskin you have on your breath, Mohel.