This was covered a month or two back. Worth a repeat. It is the double standard - no 13 yo boy is traumatized by a 29 yo woman. Especially not by Cher at 13 yo. Unless they are a fag.
And I'm not patronizing. I'm sure there are some legit cases, but having known hundreds of straight hetero teenage boys growing up, all would have been proud.
Now, there is the new outraged pussified, soyboys like yourself who want to be part of the #poundmetoo movement.
Spare me your fake outrage for your fellow pillowbiters.
having known hundreds of straight hetero teenage boys growing up, all would have been proud
This evidence is even worse than anecdotal evidence. This is like saying that no women would ever stay in an abusive relationship, because mentally healthy women who have never been in an abusive relationship would leave before it became violent. This is like saying that no one ever gets into car accidents because people who aren't driving assume they would react appropriately to hypothetical situations.
Boys who are molested or raped as adolescents might think it wasn't a bad thing at the time, even, but that doesn't mean it doesn't harm them and alter the way their brains work in a way that will negatively impact the rest of their lives. It's not okay to have sex with children.
I don't disagree with your assertions. I am trying to point out the hypocrisy. At the same time I saying there is a societal double standard. Can you acknowledge that?
Especially not by Cher at 13 yo. Unless they are a homo.
This statement indicates something much more nefarious with your intentions instead of pointing out the double standard. The fact you keep trying to jew around it speaks volumes.
That's exactly what he's arguing. All of his comments indicate as much. Had he simply left out the
Especially not by Cher at 13 yo. Unless they are a homo.
And not started attacking people because they question him on it, and dance around the fact he wrote what he wrote earlier, no one could find fault with what was written.
Beware: kneo is a kike and seeks to be controlled opposition. I am not as such for your position in this debate, but that does not change that kneo seeks to subvert and destroy debates from the inside out.
He also seems to be trying really hard on this thread because normally he calls everyone a "nigger", "faggot" or "kike" and loves to tell people to kill themselves but don't hurt any whites in the process. He's a lovely person!
I'm merely pointing out how Jewish you are and how you're trying to be subversive. You're still not addressing how your comments come across, but instead would rather focus on how the teens feel. It's irrelevant how a teen would feel - they can't legally consent.
My god, even the way you initially phrased it was to immediately demean someone who would disagree with your sentiment. "derp if you disagree you must be gay". You've been exposed, you dirty, slimey Jew.
Again, you keep not addressing your initial statement. Back peddling and going, "of course I don't condone it" doesn't properly excuse what you wrote. At least you're being consistent with your Jew tactics. It further strengthens my point.
OK @kneo24, before we go any further, we are going to play The Man Game. Because you are a man, aren't you? Not an outraged little bottom on SSRIs, right?
So you get to choose from the following subjects, which you are manliest on, and I get to ask you three questions which must be answered in short order - time hack 0842 ET:
Guns
Cooking
Cars/Trucks
Motorcycles
Any form of vehicle racing
Martial arts
Surely a loud mouth like you knows a little sumptin' sumptin' - bring it tiny boy...
Now you're deflecting and diverting by changing the topic entirely. What's in question is why you chose to frame your original statement the way you did. Keep on Jewing though.
Again, you keep refusing to address your original comment, and you're projecting here. What I know or don't know isn't the issue at hand. You trying to change the topic is just a dirty Jew trick. I don't engage in dirty Jew tricks, I expose them. Keep on exposing yourself, you fucking kike.
The victory was mine when you tried to call me a homo for pointing out how your statement was patronizing to rape victims. You can never take that back. Everyone saw it.
You have yet to address your original comment. You keep diverting and deflecting. Even your response to me pointing out how patronizing it was to rape victims tells us how much foreskin you have on your breath, Mohel.
So you're ok with hot 29 year old teachers fucking their students? Because this scenario isn't that different in terms of tje power structure.
The fact is , obvious jew, you're saying the rape of teens is ok. It has nothing to do with being straight or gay, it has nothing to do with how cool it might be when you're 13.
The fact is, a 13 year old can not consent and if it will most likely negatively impact future relationships.
You advocate for adults, ones who are nearly 30, to sleep with 13 year olds. Go find the nearest oven and do the world a favor.
You're the one being pateonizing to rape victims. If you have been following pizzagate for as long as you have, you would see how dangerous a relationship between a fully grown adult and a teen is and wouldn't essentially cheer it on. You're a disgusting person.
Finally, someone with real life experience + brain (and most likely experience with teenagers). A local HS here just cleared out the principal down to coaches in the athletic program. School system calls it "personnel matter". LEO friends will only tell me it was a "public safety issue".
A father with balls took down the whole lot of them.
That's why I pointed out the double standard. It's what society has become and something has to change in that area. Porn paved the way. Pure carnal knowledge is in their hands now. It's not going back in box.
view the rest of the comments →
Blacksmith21 ago
This was covered a month or two back. Worth a repeat. It is the double standard - no 13 yo boy is traumatized by a 29 yo woman. Especially not by Cher at 13 yo. Unless they are a fag.
kneo24 ago
Way to be patronizing to victims of rape.
Blacksmith21 ago
So you're a homo?
And I'm not patronizing. I'm sure there are some legit cases, but having known hundreds of straight hetero teenage boys growing up, all would have been proud.
Now, there is the new outraged pussified, soyboys like yourself who want to be part of the #poundmetoo movement.
Spare me your fake outrage for your fellow pillowbiters.
NoTrueScotsman ago
This evidence is even worse than anecdotal evidence. This is like saying that no women would ever stay in an abusive relationship, because mentally healthy women who have never been in an abusive relationship would leave before it became violent. This is like saying that no one ever gets into car accidents because people who aren't driving assume they would react appropriately to hypothetical situations.
Boys who are molested or raped as adolescents might think it wasn't a bad thing at the time, even, but that doesn't mean it doesn't harm them and alter the way their brains work in a way that will negatively impact the rest of their lives. It's not okay to have sex with children.
Blacksmith21 ago
I don't disagree with your assertions. I am trying to point out the hypocrisy. At the same time I saying there is a societal double standard. Can you acknowledge that?
kneo24 ago
This statement indicates something much more nefarious with your intentions instead of pointing out the double standard. The fact you keep trying to jew around it speaks volumes.
NoTrueScotsman ago
There is a societal double standard, but you seem to be arguing that that double standard is acceptable, and that's what I disagree with.
kneo24 ago
That's exactly what he's arguing. All of his comments indicate as much. Had he simply left out the
And not started attacking people because they question him on it, and dance around the fact he wrote what he wrote earlier, no one could find fault with what was written.
Blacksmith21 ago
Spare me your fake outrage dickhead @kneo24 aka @kneeling24x7
@notruescotsman - Let me ask this - have you been a teenaged boy before and are you heterosexual?
I'm not condoning any of this. But teenaged buys will be boys. I don't like it one bit. There are some things in our world which we can't change.
notenoughstuff ago
Beware: kneo is a kike and seeks to be controlled opposition. I am not as such for your position in this debate, but that does not change that kneo seeks to subvert and destroy debates from the inside out.
Shizy ago
He also seems to be trying really hard on this thread because normally he calls everyone a "nigger", "faggot" or "kike" and loves to tell people to kill themselves but don't hurt any whites in the process. He's a lovely person!
Blacksmith21 ago
Yeah. Its tactics are obvious and weak at best.
kneo24 ago
I'm merely pointing out how Jewish you are and how you're trying to be subversive. You're still not addressing how your comments come across, but instead would rather focus on how the teens feel. It's irrelevant how a teen would feel - they can't legally consent.
My god, even the way you initially phrased it was to immediately demean someone who would disagree with your sentiment. "derp if you disagree you must be gay". You've been exposed, you dirty, slimey Jew.
Blacksmith21 ago
Thank you for exposing yourself, Nazicuck.
kneo24 ago
Again, you keep not addressing your initial statement. Back peddling and going, "of course I don't condone it" doesn't properly excuse what you wrote. At least you're being consistent with your Jew tactics. It further strengthens my point.
Blacksmith21 ago
Watch kiddies - here's how to expose a Nazishill:
OK @kneo24, before we go any further, we are going to play The Man Game. Because you are a man, aren't you? Not an outraged little bottom on SSRIs, right?
So you get to choose from the following subjects, which you are manliest on, and I get to ask you three questions which must be answered in short order - time hack 0842 ET:
Surely a loud mouth like you knows a little sumptin' sumptin' - bring it tiny boy...
kneo24 ago
Now you're deflecting and diverting by changing the topic entirely. What's in question is why you chose to frame your original statement the way you did. Keep on Jewing though.
Blacksmith21 ago
Nope. I'll answer your questions. If they aren't looney rants. But first you have to prove you are a man. Pick a topic dickbreath.
Blacksmith21 ago
Right there, you lost the argument "boy". Any dude with testicles would've stepped up.
1) You are a chick - which is fine by me
2) You are a "dude" with soft, supple hands that I could crush with my weak hand
3) You are 1 and 2 but your employer's "narrative guide" prohibits you from engaging in "conversations of a personal nature"
@gamepwn
kneo24 ago
Keep on deflecting and diverting from your original comment. I see you're engaging in projection now.
Blacksmith21 ago
And this is where you are wrong. You can't even talk about anything off-narrative. It is VERBOTEN, ya?
[You're too stupid to be AI, FWIW]
kneo24 ago
Again, you keep refusing to address your original comment, and you're projecting here. What I know or don't know isn't the issue at hand. You trying to change the topic is just a dirty Jew trick. I don't engage in dirty Jew tricks, I expose them. Keep on exposing yourself, you fucking kike.
Blacksmith21 ago
Point made. You're a paid shill. G'nIght twinkletoes. I'm about to sign off. You lost.
kneo24 ago
The victory was mine when you tried to call me a homo for pointing out how your statement was patronizing to rape victims. You can never take that back. Everyone saw it.
Blacksmith21 ago
"The victory was mine" - Sorry spermburper - this isn't a videogame. Thank you for exposing yourself. Q is right - y'all really ARE dumb as dogshit.
kneo24 ago
You have yet to address your original comment. You keep diverting and deflecting. Even your response to me pointing out how patronizing it was to rape victims tells us how much foreskin you have on your breath, Mohel.
kneo24 ago
So you're ok with hot 29 year old teachers fucking their students? Because this scenario isn't that different in terms of tje power structure.
The fact is , obvious jew, you're saying the rape of teens is ok. It has nothing to do with being straight or gay, it has nothing to do with how cool it might be when you're 13.
The fact is, a 13 year old can not consent and if it will most likely negatively impact future relationships.
You advocate for adults, ones who are nearly 30, to sleep with 13 year olds. Go find the nearest oven and do the world a favor.
Blacksmith21 ago
I'm shutting this down right here because you are a lying fucker who is putting words in my mouth. Fuck off fag. ENDTRANS
kneo24 ago
You're the one being pateonizing to rape victims. If you have been following pizzagate for as long as you have, you would see how dangerous a relationship between a fully grown adult and a teen is and wouldn't essentially cheer it on. You're a disgusting person.
gamepwn ago
Blacksmith21 this is still child rape man. It doesn't matter either way it's child rape.
Blacksmith21 ago
I agree it is. I'm saying society views it differently, depending on the gender.
new4now ago
you will find double standard with teachers
good looking female and the guys are like why couldnt that have been me
but yet the gym coach with a student is a no no
Blacksmith21 ago
Finally, someone with real life experience + brain (and most likely experience with teenagers). A local HS here just cleared out the principal down to coaches in the athletic program. School system calls it "personnel matter". LEO friends will only tell me it was a "public safety issue".
A father with balls took down the whole lot of them.
new4now ago
wow, that should have been in paper
I would very much lime to shake his hand
gamepwn ago
Ah I see, I know it does sadly. Female pedophiles often get away with it to.
Blacksmith21 ago
And sometimes people have to be smacked in the head to be reminded.
Blacksmith21 ago
That's why I pointed out the double standard. It's what society has become and something has to change in that area. Porn paved the way. Pure carnal knowledge is in their hands now. It's not going back in box.