The fact that YouTube is not censoring this guy is a red flag.
This is a hurried and frantic rushing out of information. This list contains names on my radar since the outset of Pizzagate, but with no supporting evidence or corroboration of his claims. Each one of these big names could have 3 hours devoted to their complicity, but this guy is doing a classic David Seaman and making himself the center of attention.
This is actually going to dilute the charges because in another couple of days, this guy is going to outed as a nutcase or attention whore. Then all these names who rightly belong on our radar will be exonerated from ''the unfair right-wing conservative conspiracy against them''.
There should be some sort of rules/guidelines established before believing such charges.
There should be evidence.
If the evidence is of the circumstantial kind, then ALL THE DETAILS THAT WERE NOT PREVIOUSLY KNOWN MUST BE GIVEN
If it's an eyewitness statement, again, ALL DETAILS THAT WERE NOT PREVIOUS KNOWN MUST BE GIVEN.
I guess I'd give the example of Benjamin Szemkus giving alleged eyewitness testimony about a NXIVM party that Schumer, Abedin, and other attended. Here's a link:
Is it true? It has not been proven, BUT he has given details including the names of people who were not thought to be connected through this cult. While it doesn't give validity, it does establish that the person who claims to have been there, has a ''whole'' memory of the encounter and is willing to spill about it.
This isn't being done ... not even a little. Hell, anyone could go on YouTube and pick from our Usual Suspect list and recite the names. It doesn't mean anything, and I really am not trying to follow these Pied Pipers who seem immune to making statements that could be considered libelous. But there he is, allowing his identity to be revealed to all ... with no proof and only acting like a parrot.
Sometimes I think you're a shill and sometimes I think you're only careful -- if you know what I mean. This sort of investigation brings out an unnaturally strong suspicion, but you really seem to be spot on with this one.
And I have a post coming up on Kappy ... you're going to be surprised (or not!) with who he's aligned with. This person was someone I was on the fence about, but now I'd say that this person reeks and has not been on our side since the beginning. Will be interested to hear what you think because it was a shockeroo.
view the rest of the comments →
Oh_Well_ian ago
The fact that YouTube is not censoring this guy is a red flag.
This is a hurried and frantic rushing out of information. This list contains names on my radar since the outset of Pizzagate, but with no supporting evidence or corroboration of his claims. Each one of these big names could have 3 hours devoted to their complicity, but this guy is doing a classic David Seaman and making himself the center of attention.
notagame ago
I gotta agree with you.
This is actually going to dilute the charges because in another couple of days, this guy is going to outed as a nutcase or attention whore. Then all these names who rightly belong on our radar will be exonerated from ''the unfair right-wing conservative conspiracy against them''.
There should be some sort of rules/guidelines established before believing such charges.
I guess I'd give the example of Benjamin Szemkus giving alleged eyewitness testimony about a NXIVM party that Schumer, Abedin, and other attended. Here's a link:
Is it true? It has not been proven, BUT he has given details including the names of people who were not thought to be connected through this cult. While it doesn't give validity, it does establish that the person who claims to have been there, has a ''whole'' memory of the encounter and is willing to spill about it.
This isn't being done ... not even a little. Hell, anyone could go on YouTube and pick from our Usual Suspect list and recite the names. It doesn't mean anything, and I really am not trying to follow these Pied Pipers who seem immune to making statements that could be considered libelous. But there he is, allowing his identity to be revealed to all ... with no proof and only acting like a parrot.
Oh_Well_ian ago
thank you.
That was well articulated and an accurate description of the tactics at play.
The good news is that it reeks of desperation and an impending and imminent doomsday for the people on the list.
notagame ago
You're welcome.
Sometimes I think you're a shill and sometimes I think you're only careful -- if you know what I mean. This sort of investigation brings out an unnaturally strong suspicion, but you really seem to be spot on with this one.
And I have a post coming up on Kappy ... you're going to be surprised (or not!) with who he's aligned with. This person was someone I was on the fence about, but now I'd say that this person reeks and has not been on our side since the beginning. Will be interested to hear what you think because it was a shockeroo.
Oh_Well_ian ago
I have no problem with people keeping one eye open on every user.
Look forward to seeing your post on Kappy.
notagame ago
It's up and posted. I didn't have time for an in-depth view, but this should be enough to let anyone know that the guy is not to be trusted.