You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Oh_Well_ian ago

The fact that YouTube is not censoring this guy is a red flag.

This is a hurried and frantic rushing out of information. This list contains names on my radar since the outset of Pizzagate, but with no supporting evidence or corroboration of his claims. Each one of these big names could have 3 hours devoted to their complicity, but this guy is doing a classic David Seaman and making himself the center of attention.

Pr1vate0xymoron ago

Great point. It should just not come as a surprise that the majority of celebrities, if not all of them in higher levels are pedophiles. Not that they don't need to be looked into or anything but there just can't be a way they let anyone to that level unless they are sure you will definitely go with the agenda that's planned.

YouTube censors and oppposes the hell out of anyone who is truly hitting the right notes. David Seaman ran out of ways to re-wrap the same exact message. We all could have said fuck hillary a little louder upon every video upload too. That's why I don't claim I'm a real researcher. But he was clearly just coming to Voat to scream the sticky that was up that day. His donations to researcher claims ratio was too damn high!

21yearsofdigging ago

Yup, so true. I have been screaming about ritual abuse for many many years and I get videos taken down, friend's channels who interview, their channels are taken down(i.e. Victurus Libertas) Ironies of ironies, I was actually a pretty successful Hollywood actor, all up until my 4 year old son was threatened to be hurt if he talked to me.My children were taken against court orders, to Europe and my career was virtually finished.

3141592653 ago

Kappy says he has been being censored and having difficulties posting

Oh_Well_ian ago

yeah... well he still has not provided any solid evidence to back up his claims... Seaman was acting like he was being stalked when he got started, too.

Wouldn't going after just Spielberg be sufficient if he has evidence? There is a lot there he could tie into other research that has already been done by others.

notagame ago

I gotta agree with you.

This is actually going to dilute the charges because in another couple of days, this guy is going to outed as a nutcase or attention whore. Then all these names who rightly belong on our radar will be exonerated from ''the unfair right-wing conservative conspiracy against them''.

There should be some sort of rules/guidelines established before believing such charges.

  1. There should be evidence.
  2. If the evidence is of the circumstantial kind, then ALL THE DETAILS THAT WERE NOT PREVIOUSLY KNOWN MUST BE GIVEN
  3. If it's an eyewitness statement, again, ALL DETAILS THAT WERE NOT PREVIOUS KNOWN MUST BE GIVEN.

I guess I'd give the example of Benjamin Szemkus giving alleged eyewitness testimony about a NXIVM party that Schumer, Abedin, and other attended. Here's a link:

https://artvoice.com/2018/06/14/man-claims-he-went-to-nxivm-sex-cult-party-with-allison-mack-stormy-daniels-eric-schniederman-anthony-weiner-huma-abedin/

Is it true? It has not been proven, BUT he has given details including the names of people who were not thought to be connected through this cult. While it doesn't give validity, it does establish that the person who claims to have been there, has a ''whole'' memory of the encounter and is willing to spill about it.

This isn't being done ... not even a little. Hell, anyone could go on YouTube and pick from our Usual Suspect list and recite the names. It doesn't mean anything, and I really am not trying to follow these Pied Pipers who seem immune to making statements that could be considered libelous. But there he is, allowing his identity to be revealed to all ... with no proof and only acting like a parrot.

Oh_Well_ian ago

thank you.

That was well articulated and an accurate description of the tactics at play.

The good news is that it reeks of desperation and an impending and imminent doomsday for the people on the list.

notagame ago

You're welcome.

Sometimes I think you're a shill and sometimes I think you're only careful -- if you know what I mean. This sort of investigation brings out an unnaturally strong suspicion, but you really seem to be spot on with this one.

And I have a post coming up on Kappy ... you're going to be surprised (or not!) with who he's aligned with. This person was someone I was on the fence about, but now I'd say that this person reeks and has not been on our side since the beginning. Will be interested to hear what you think because it was a shockeroo.

Oh_Well_ian ago

I have no problem with people keeping one eye open on every user.

Look forward to seeing your post on Kappy.

notagame ago

It's up and posted. I didn't have time for an in-depth view, but this should be enough to let anyone know that the guy is not to be trusted.