You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

rickman ago

It appears when Gunn was first criticised for some blog posts in 2012, the articles strangely ignore his paedophile tweets.

James Gunn Google results November 2012

These articles from 2012 bring up worrying questions. Why do none of them make any mention of Gunn's paedophile tweets and jokes? Why was Gunn allowed to get away with only apologising for his blog posts and allowed to continue working with the Marvel franchise? Why now, with these old tweets are they being brought up and why does his lose his job?

Makes me wonder if this is an example of the silence that surrounded Hollywood before Pizzagate, before Weinstein, before Spacey, before Schneider.

Jamescrow117 ago

They ignored them because they understand comedy.....

The same people who got upset over these tweets are the same people who found Roseanne funny...the show not the tweets.

If your exposure to Comedy is limited to network sitcoms and mainstream releases you have no business offering your uneducated opinions.

septimasexta ago

"If your exposure to Comedy is limited to network sitcoms and mainstream releases you have no business offering your uneducated opinions." Is this your "All the world's a stage" defense angle? "Child sn*ff films are OK because all the cool comics are showing them." "Fatherhood" is their fave.

OH, YES. THAT EXPLAINS EVERYTHING! PROBLEM SOLVED.