https://ktla.com/2018/07/12/adoption-agencies-could-refuse-same-sex-couples-under-measure-approved-by-house-panel/
The House Appropriations Committee passed an amendment on Wednesday that, if implemented, would allow adoption agencies to refuse gay couples based on their moral or religious beliefs.
The amendment, which was introduced by GOP Rep. Robert Aderholt of Alabama, would allow child welfare providers to decline to “provide a service that conflicts with its sincerely held religious beliefs or moral convictions,” according to the congressman.
Because of this provision, the amendment would allow more religious organizations, such as Catholic Charities and Bethany Christian Services — examples Aderholt provided — to operate child welfare agencies.
“The reason for this is simply because these organizations, based on religious conviction, choose not to place children with same-sex couples,” he said in a statement.
He continued: “The amendment I introduced seeks to prevent these (state) governments from discriminating against child welfare providers on the basis that the provider declines to provide a service that conflicts with its sincerely held religious beliefs or moral convictions,” he said in a statement.
The amendment could have consequences for LGBTQ-friendly states. It would require the US Department of Health and Human Services to withhold 15 percent of the federal funds for child welfare services from states and localities don’t meet the same standards for protecting religious adoption groups.
Progressive Democrats in the House are speaking out against the amendment, saying it would deny same-sex couples the right to adopt.
“Same-sex couples are six times more likely to foster and four times more likely to adopt. Denying kids loving parents is wrong,” Democratic Rep. Mark Pocan, a gay congressman from Wisconsin, said in a tweet.
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi called the amendment a “disgusting, deeply immoral and profoundly offensive effort.”
“House Republicans chose to sacrifice the well-being of little children to push a bigoted, anti-LGBTQ agenda, potentially denying tens of thousands of vulnerable children the opportunity to find a loving and safe home,” the California Democrat said in a statement.
The office of House Speaker Paul Ryan, a Wisconsin Republican, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Pizzagate related because Govt. trying to regulate the placement of orphaned children into homes run by religious organizations.
Because of this provision, the amendment would allow more religious organizations, such as Catholic Charities and Bethany Christian Services — examples Aderholt provided — to operate child welfare agencies.
This Is Just What We Do NOT Need. This Will Increase The Number of Religious Agencies. They are responsible for so much of the abuse
caused by agencies that CPS and religious agencies use to hold many of the foster care children until they are placed.
view the rest of the comments →
Oh_Well_ian ago
KNOW THIS >> Pedophiles are HIDING Behind the LBGT Movement and Using Gay Marriage to Adopt Lifetime Victims for Their Own Sick Needs
carmencita ago
OMG. Thank you for posting that former thread! @Cc1914 You need to look at this. Look at your comment in the thread! Amazing and MUST be read by all.
Cc1914 ago
Wow 28 upvoats .. I’m happy people read it , and maybe finished reading the rest of the gay manifesto . Look what I just saw for the first time ! http://www.houstonpress.com/news/finally-documented-proof-of-the-homosexual-agenda-7709079
carmencita ago
Bronski had also thought "Michael Swift" was a pseudonym, and likens the homophobic groups who still disseminate his "manifesto" as "very much like people who would've taken Jonathan Swift's Modest Proposal seriously. I mean, he didn't really intend...to eat Irish babies.”
WHAT? to eat Irish babies? WTH? I have to read that WHOLE Manifesto.................. did you see that?
Cc1914 ago
Wait what? I didn’t see that .. I’m reading it now ( gay manifesto) and I think we should revisit it . This .. 😮“ The exquisite society to emerge will be governed by an elite comprised of gay poets. One of the major requirements for a position of power in the new society of homoeroticism will be indulgence in the Greek passion. Any man contaminated with heterosexual lust will be automatically barred from a position of influence. All males who insist on remaining stupidly heterosexual will be tried in homosexual courts of justice and will become invisible men. “
YogSoggoth ago
Yeah, some imagination that Swift had, huh? The Houston Chronicle writer used the Jonathan Swift 'Elites eating poor children' as a reference to debunk the gay manifesto. Now we know they were indeed sacrificing poor Irish children, so how much else of this fiction is "accidentally true," like the manifesto writer's last name actually being Swift?
Cc1914 ago
But is he the actual writer though ? I thought it was this guy .. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Wittman
YogSoggoth ago
Unless there is two gay manifestos ... I have no frigging Idea! Is this some kind of media obfuscation? Wikipedia is known for censorship, while at the same time asking for donations. If so, I would go with the earlier Houston Chronicle gay guy just because of the timeline. How am I going to explain to my family I have become a Gay detective, and still stay fashionable at the picnic? It's like I am living a double life here.
Cc1914 ago
I share your same frustrations 😐
YogSoggoth ago
I can tell you that someone is going down here, even if I ain't the one. Search engines are enough to piss me of for life, until dead.