The Justice Department announced charges Friday against 12 Russian intelligence officers for hacking offenses during the 2016 presidential election.
The indictments were announced Friday by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein as part of the ongoing special counsel probe into potential coordination between the Trump campaign and Russia.
The Russians are accused of hacking into the computer networks of the Democratic National Committee, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and the presidential campaign of Hillary Clinton, and then releasing stolen emails on the internet in the months before the election.
Next they will accuse 'The Russians' of weaponizing the emails. You all know which emails I'm referring to... The disgusting pedophile emails that wikileaks released in the fall of 2016.
Shit is getting real my friends... Never forget, his name was Seth Rich.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/12-russians-accused-hacking-democrats-2016-us-election-161839939--politics.html
The indictments - https://www.justice.gov/file/1080281/download
view the rest of the comments →
Pizzalawyer ago
Ive read only the news report you furnished us. There is a difference between hacking and downloading on a thumbdrive. . I wonder can any of the hacking be traced to the Wikileaks disclosures. I believe Assange said that the materials he was given could not have been transmitted that fast from to him, that in his opinion the theft of files that he published was an inside job. Im far from.tech savvy but want to know if there is any evidence here relative to Seth Rich. Just pondering...
EricKaliberhall ago
https://voat.co/v/GreatAwakening/2427262
BKAtheManScout ago
Occam's Razor here says it was a thumb drive and an internal leak, based off of that information.
Are_we__sure ago
Occam's Razor requires you working from accurate information.
The information is completely wrong, so Occam's Razor doesn't apply.
There's no way at all to tell if the metadata the guy was looking was from THE TIME OF TRANSFER. It could have been copied a hundred times in a hundred different ways before the metadata the guy was using was created.
Also some of this material appeared on a new web DC Leaks. A website created just for this material. That website was registered before the dates on the files.
The date on the files IS after the DNC brought in cyber security experts and basically redid their entire system. The DNC hack was publically announced before the copy dates on these files.
http://thehill.com/policy/cybersecurity/346468-why-the-latest-theory-about-the-dnc-not-being-a-hack-is-probably-wrong
Pizzalawyer ago
thank you EricK, I thought I had read that somewhere.