You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Pizzalawyer ago

Ive read only the news report you furnished us. There is a difference between hacking and downloading on a thumbdrive. . I wonder can any of the hacking be traced to the Wikileaks disclosures. I believe Assange said that the materials he was given could not have been transmitted that fast from to him, that in his opinion the theft of files that he published was an inside job. Im far from.tech savvy but want to know if there is any evidence here relative to Seth Rich. Just pondering...

BKAtheManScout ago

Occam's Razor here says it was a thumb drive and an internal leak, based off of that information.

Are_we__sure ago

Occam's Razor requires you working from accurate information.

The information is completely wrong, so Occam's Razor doesn't apply.

There's no way at all to tell if the metadata the guy was looking was from THE TIME OF TRANSFER. It could have been copied a hundred times in a hundred different ways before the metadata the guy was using was created.

Also some of this material appeared on a new web DC Leaks. A website created just for this material. That website was registered before the dates on the files.

The date on the files IS after the DNC brought in cyber security experts and basically redid their entire system. The DNC hack was publically announced before the copy dates on these files.

http://thehill.com/policy/cybersecurity/346468-why-the-latest-theory-about-the-dnc-not-being-a-hack-is-probably-wrong

Pizzalawyer ago

thank you EricK, I thought I had read that somewhere.