OP tied it to the possible weaponizing of the Podesta emails, which are very much pizzagate. It's not a strong connection, but it is a possibility....

How is this Pizzagate? There is no attempt to connect in the post and it has nothing to do with child trafficking/abuse etc.

Because two of the mods here would turn this board into a Trump/Q newswire if it were up to them.

you are right, some of us are using it to broadcast news bulletins. Maybe we should immediately strike such posts with instructions to post a very brief news bulletin for which no comments are permitted.. The Weiner apartment death and the Stormy Daniels matter didn't belong here either.

Yes, there needs to be more room for CDAN posts!

The fellas here are right. It's a bid for time. They are trying to draw this shit out because they are cornered. They've lost. You've got to imagine that, whenever they make moves like this it is coming as a last resort. They are playing defense. They don't move until they have to. They behave this way because they don't have choices. People with choices make moves preemptively, and it fucks them. People who are FUCKED make moves because they have to, and they are no other choices. I believe they are being whittled down. They are boxed into a corner, and are doing whatever they can to keep their narrative, and ever decreasing options open. The hilarious part about this conference is that they had to have two no name mother fuckers standing behind rod, and that virtually no one was present, and there were no shots of the crowd etc. - They are desperate.

Just because a player places a big bet, doesn't mean he has a hand.

As long as there is only one actual "truth," this is my gut feeling as well.

People are saying the indictment refers to WikiLeaks as Organization 1

https://twitter.com/WriteSmitty/status/1017822012729946112?s=09

I've read only the news report you furnished us. There is a difference between hacking and downloading on a thumbdrive. . I wonder can any of the hacking be traced to the Wikileaks disclosures.

It's certainly possible that could have something that connects this Wikileaks, but Wikileaks has said that their system allows for anonymous submissions, that Wikileaks doesn't know who is uploading to them. Which is why it was very fishy when Assange tried to imply Seth Rich was the uploader.

Dotcom's assertion is backed up by an analysis done last year by a researcher who goes by the name Forensicator, who determined that the DNC files were copied at 22.6 MB/s - a speed virtually impossible to achieve from halfway around the world, much less over a local network - yet a speed typical of file transfers to a memory stick.

https://voat.co/v/GreatAwakening/2427262

Hacking and a thumb drive are not mutually incompatible. In fact, the major criticism of the "Forensicator" analysis is he didn't know what he was measuring. He had no idea what the metadata and speeds referred to Even if he proved the metadata showed the files were moved to a thumb drive AND HE DIDN'T. There's still myriad ways the files could have wound up on a thumb drive AFTER the hack.

For example, you hack and extract the files, but you don't want to use your computer. So you do this from an internet cafe and when you have the files you put them on a thumb drive.

Or you hack the files to your hard drive, but now you have to pass the files to the intelligence agency you are working for. So instead of leaving a trail of you to your handler, you mail a thumb drive to them or do a dead drop or go to the same Starbucks and hand it to them.

Or you are a foreign intelligence agency and you hack and extract the files right to your headquarters. But you don't speak English very well or you are an IT guy, not a political guy, so you have to hand off copies to various other people who are going to analyze the files you have.

But Foresicator's theory failed just on the technical merits. The speeds revealed by the metadata can be achieved by nation state hackers.

https://voat.co/v/GreatAwakening/2427262