I'm giving this the 24 Hour warning flair, since there is no linked support presented for any of these claims. If that isn't added to the post, this will be flaired as "Unverified" and then removed per Rule 2 tomorrow. This belongs in v/pizzagatewhatever...it doesn't even attempt to meet our research requirements.
since there is no linked support presented for any of these claims. If that isn't added to the post, this will be flaired as "Unverified" and then removed per Rule 2 tomorrow.
There is also no real evidence that Joe Biden is a pedophile but you didn't bother that thread. There is no evidence that 2300 people were just arrested but you didn't bother that thread. When people point the finger at the real perps and explain why they do what they do you rush in and try to stop the conversation. This lady names the perps and goes into detail about why they do what they do.
There is also no real evidence that Joe Biden is a pedophile
Not true. We all saw how he groped kids - it's on video.
This lady names the perps and goes into detail about why they do what they do.
Just 'naming' perps is not enough. I'm sometimes really shaking my head, Esoteric. You're sharp, right? But when you discover something that simply seems to fit into one of your theories, you fall for it, no matter how speculative it is.
On the other hand, you rightly insist that we need to be accurate.
I recently looked into the 'Black Nobility' theory as promoted by the ahuwazeus blogger. It's simply crap. Pure, unsubstantiated crap. Not saying that some of these families are not connected to organized crime, but the guy just made 80% of the stuff he wrote up. (And I'm being generous writing '80%' and not '90%').
TL;DR: We lose our credibility if we accept anything we just like to hear, because it sounds so exciting.
Not true. We all saw how he groped kids - it's on video.
I don't like the creepy old fucker either but what he did is not pedophilia and i'm using him to make a point.
But when you discover something that simply seems to fit into one of your theories, you fall for it, no matter how speculative it is.
Vindicator has pet subjects that get a pass of leniency. Subjects pertaining to Freemasonry, Zionism, Jesuits, Trump, get judged harshly and he suddenly wants "evidence" so he can delete it. Its a pattern.
I recently looked into the 'Black Nobility' theory as promoted by the ahuwazeus blogger.
Subjects pertaining to Freemasonry, Zionism, Jesuits, Trump, get judged harshly and he suddenly wants "evidence" so he can delete it. Its a pattern.
That's bullshit. I don't remember one post he flaired and then later removed about these topics I wouldn't have flaired myself.
And I'm not a Trump supporter, as we all know, and think Freemasons are as deep into the shit as possible, I'm not a zionist, and I don't have anything against posts that show that Jesuits are involved, as long as we see legit sources.
We don't censor content anyway. A post adheres to the rules, or it doesn't.
view the rest of the comments →
Vindicator ago
LOL...lady needs some meds.
I'm giving this the 24 Hour warning flair, since there is no linked support presented for any of these claims. If that isn't added to the post, this will be flaired as "Unverified" and then removed per Rule 2 tomorrow. This belongs in v/pizzagatewhatever...it doesn't even attempt to meet our research requirements.
@think- @ben_matlock @Honeybee_ @EricKaliberhall
ESOTERICshade ago
There is also no real evidence that Joe Biden is a pedophile but you didn't bother that thread. There is no evidence that 2300 people were just arrested but you didn't bother that thread. When people point the finger at the real perps and explain why they do what they do you rush in and try to stop the conversation. This lady names the perps and goes into detail about why they do what they do.
think- ago
Not true. We all saw how he groped kids - it's on video.
Just 'naming' perps is not enough. I'm sometimes really shaking my head, Esoteric. You're sharp, right? But when you discover something that simply seems to fit into one of your theories, you fall for it, no matter how speculative it is.
On the other hand, you rightly insist that we need to be accurate.
I recently looked into the 'Black Nobility' theory as promoted by the ahuwazeus blogger. It's simply crap. Pure, unsubstantiated crap. Not saying that some of these families are not connected to organized crime, but the guy just made 80% of the stuff he wrote up. (And I'm being generous writing '80%' and not '90%').
TL;DR: We lose our credibility if we accept anything we just like to hear, because it sounds so exciting.
ESOTERICshade ago
I don't like the creepy old fucker either but what he did is not pedophilia and i'm using him to make a point.
Vindicator has pet subjects that get a pass of leniency. Subjects pertaining to Freemasonry, Zionism, Jesuits, Trump, get judged harshly and he suddenly wants "evidence" so he can delete it. Its a pattern.
Great
think- ago
That's bullshit. I don't remember one post he flaired and then later removed about these topics I wouldn't have flaired myself.
And I'm not a Trump supporter, as we all know, and think Freemasons are as deep into the shit as possible, I'm not a zionist, and I don't have anything against posts that show that Jesuits are involved, as long as we see legit sources.
We don't censor content anyway. A post adheres to the rules, or it doesn't.
@Vindicator @Crensch @ben_matlock @EricKaliberhall @srayzie
ESOTERICshade ago
Pro Trump thread. Broke the rules. He ignored it. Bias. Open and shut.
https://www.voat.co/v/pizzagate/2589689