I'm giving this the 24 Hour warning flair, since there is no linked support presented for any of these claims. If that isn't added to the post, this will be flaired as "Unverified" and then removed per Rule 2 tomorrow. This belongs in v/pizzagatewhatever...it doesn't even attempt to meet our research requirements.
since there is no linked support presented for any of these claims. If that isn't added to the post, this will be flaired as "Unverified" and then removed per Rule 2 tomorrow.
There is also no real evidence that Joe Biden is a pedophile but you didn't bother that thread. There is no evidence that 2300 people were just arrested but you didn't bother that thread. When people point the finger at the real perps and explain why they do what they do you rush in and try to stop the conversation. This lady names the perps and goes into detail about why they do what they do.
There is also no real evidence that Joe Biden is a pedophile
Not true. We all saw how he groped kids - it's on video.
This lady names the perps and goes into detail about why they do what they do.
Just 'naming' perps is not enough. I'm sometimes really shaking my head, Esoteric. You're sharp, right? But when you discover something that simply seems to fit into one of your theories, you fall for it, no matter how speculative it is.
On the other hand, you rightly insist that we need to be accurate.
I recently looked into the 'Black Nobility' theory as promoted by the ahuwazeus blogger. It's simply crap. Pure, unsubstantiated crap. Not saying that some of these families are not connected to organized crime, but the guy just made 80% of the stuff he wrote up. (And I'm being generous writing '80%' and not '90%').
TL;DR: We lose our credibility if we accept anything we just like to hear, because it sounds so exciting.
Not true. We all saw how he groped kids - it's on video.
I don't like the creepy old fucker either but what he did is not pedophilia and i'm using him to make a point.
But when you discover something that simply seems to fit into one of your theories, you fall for it, no matter how speculative it is.
Vindicator has pet subjects that get a pass of leniency. Subjects pertaining to Freemasonry, Zionism, Jesuits, Trump, get judged harshly and he suddenly wants "evidence" so he can delete it. Its a pattern.
I recently looked into the 'Black Nobility' theory as promoted by the ahuwazeus blogger.
don't like the creepy old fucker either but what he did is not pedophilia
Ok, Esoteric, I will quote this in the future. For the record: Esoteric thinks groping kids like Joe Biden does on the videos we have seen is not pedophilia. Noted.
Ok, Esoteric, I will quote this in the future. For the record: Esoteric thinks groping kids like Joe Biden does on the videos we have seen is not pedophilia. Noted.
Go for it if thats the way you play ball. I expected you to be an objective mod instead of a "team player." I'm making a point about his bias against threads critical of Trump, Zionism, Freemasons, and Jesuits. I also used a couple of other threads as examples.
I'm also right because the creepy old fucker should keep his hands off kids but he cannot be arrested for it.
Lame retraction attempt.
You claimed that @Vindicator was too lenient against posts that say Biden is a pedo, based on the video evidence.
You can also stare at a little kids body for ten minutes in a suggestive way (there's a photo of Biden doing this out there, although I'm not sure it isn't photoshopped) without getting arrested.
So we should pull posts for discussing anything that won't lead to an immediate arrest?
If you want to attack @Vindicator, you better get your rhetoric right. Or it will backfire in no time.
You want the community to believe posts should be flaired because Biden groping kids is not an adequate source for pedophilia here on the sub?
If he is going to make posts about talmudists, zionists, and anti Trump follow the rules, the the post below needs to follow the same rules. And I don't care what you say about the Biden bullshit because technically i'm right. You are trying to compare me to pedophiles. Nice. You won't comment on the below thread. Why not?
No I don't. You have run out of arguments and are using this as a strawman now. Weak. I'm disappointed. I thought you were a sharp cookie that wouldn't need to use a strawman because he ran out of ideas.
view the rest of the comments →
Vindicator ago
LOL...lady needs some meds.
I'm giving this the 24 Hour warning flair, since there is no linked support presented for any of these claims. If that isn't added to the post, this will be flaired as "Unverified" and then removed per Rule 2 tomorrow. This belongs in v/pizzagatewhatever...it doesn't even attempt to meet our research requirements.
@think- @ben_matlock @Honeybee_ @EricKaliberhall
ESOTERICshade ago
There is also no real evidence that Joe Biden is a pedophile but you didn't bother that thread. There is no evidence that 2300 people were just arrested but you didn't bother that thread. When people point the finger at the real perps and explain why they do what they do you rush in and try to stop the conversation. This lady names the perps and goes into detail about why they do what they do.
think- ago
Not true. We all saw how he groped kids - it's on video.
Just 'naming' perps is not enough. I'm sometimes really shaking my head, Esoteric. You're sharp, right? But when you discover something that simply seems to fit into one of your theories, you fall for it, no matter how speculative it is.
On the other hand, you rightly insist that we need to be accurate.
I recently looked into the 'Black Nobility' theory as promoted by the ahuwazeus blogger. It's simply crap. Pure, unsubstantiated crap. Not saying that some of these families are not connected to organized crime, but the guy just made 80% of the stuff he wrote up. (And I'm being generous writing '80%' and not '90%').
TL;DR: We lose our credibility if we accept anything we just like to hear, because it sounds so exciting.
ESOTERICshade ago
I don't like the creepy old fucker either but what he did is not pedophilia and i'm using him to make a point.
Vindicator has pet subjects that get a pass of leniency. Subjects pertaining to Freemasonry, Zionism, Jesuits, Trump, get judged harshly and he suddenly wants "evidence" so he can delete it. Its a pattern.
Great
think- ago
Ok, Esoteric, I will quote this in the future. For the record: Esoteric thinks groping kids like Joe Biden does on the videos we have seen is not pedophilia. Noted.
@Vindicator @Crensch @ben_matlock @EricKaliberhall @Honeybee_
ESOTERICshade ago
Go for it if thats the way you play ball. I expected you to be an objective mod instead of a "team player." I'm making a point about his bias against threads critical of Trump, Zionism, Freemasons, and Jesuits. I also used a couple of other threads as examples.
think- ago
Lame retraction attempt.
You claimed that @Vindicator was too lenient against posts that say Biden is a pedo, based on the video evidence.
You can also stare at a little kids body for ten minutes in a suggestive way (there's a photo of Biden doing this out there, although I'm not sure it isn't photoshopped) without getting arrested.
So we should pull posts for discussing anything that won't lead to an immediate arrest?
If you want to attack @Vindicator, you better get your rhetoric right. Or it will backfire in no time.
You want the community to believe posts should be flaired because Biden groping kids is not an adequate source for pedophilia here on the sub?
Go for it, do a post in v/pizzagatemods, or stop attacking @Vindicator with such a ridiculous claim.
I'm objective. Ask @Vindicator. grin If he or @ben_matlock or @EricKaliberhall or @Honeybee_ will do something I don't agree with, I tell them. And I accept criticism from them.
As I wrote some months ago before I became a mod when a troll attacked @Vindicator:
So which part of 'I also would have flaired this post' didn't you get?
@Vindicator @Crensch @ben_matlock @EricKaliberhall @Honeybee_
ESOTERICshade ago
Gonna man up and flair this thread?
https://www.voat.co/v/pizzagate/2590218
ESOTERICshade ago
Lets pro Trump threads break rule 2.
https://www.voat.co/v/pizzagate/2588737/13018147
Does not know how to post a thread of his own that meets Rule 2.
https://www.voat.co/v/pizzagate/2590218
So you want to compare me to pedophiles because of Biden? OK.
think- ago
Using a strawman now? You must be desperate, Esoteric. I never said that.
You said what Biden did wasn't pedophilia 'technically speaking'. At least have the balls and don't deny it.
@Vindicator @Crensch @ben_matlock @EricKaliberhall @srayzie
ESOTERICshade ago
If he is going to make posts about talmudists, zionists, and anti Trump follow the rules, the the post below needs to follow the same rules. And I don't care what you say about the Biden bullshit because technically i'm right. You are trying to compare me to pedophiles. Nice. You won't comment on the below thread. Why not?
https://www.voat.co/v/pizzagate/2588737/13018147
pro trump bias
think- ago
No I don't. You have run out of arguments and are using this as a strawman now. Weak. I'm disappointed. I thought you were a sharp cookie that wouldn't need to use a strawman because he ran out of ideas.
@Vindicator @Crensch @ben_matlock @EricKaliberhall @srayzie
ESOTERICshade ago
I don't care I have moved on.