You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Vindicator ago

LOL...lady needs some meds.

I'm giving this the 24 Hour warning flair, since there is no linked support presented for any of these claims. If that isn't added to the post, this will be flaired as "Unverified" and then removed per Rule 2 tomorrow. This belongs in v/pizzagatewhatever...it doesn't even attempt to meet our research requirements.

@think- @ben_matlock @Honeybee_ @EricKaliberhall

ESOTERICshade ago

since there is no linked support presented for any of these claims. If that isn't added to the post, this will be flaired as "Unverified" and then removed per Rule 2 tomorrow.

There is also no real evidence that Joe Biden is a pedophile but you didn't bother that thread. There is no evidence that 2300 people were just arrested but you didn't bother that thread. When people point the finger at the real perps and explain why they do what they do you rush in and try to stop the conversation. This lady names the perps and goes into detail about why they do what they do.

Crensch ago

OP is complete horseshit. I saw it in /new and was going to post on it, but decided to let @Vindicator et al. deal with it.

There is also no real evidence that Joe Biden is a pedophile but you didn't bother that thread.

Bullshit. Dude is seen multiple times touching little girls and leaning in WAY too close, and grabbing baby crotch. If he's not a pedophile, he should be put down for looking EXACTLY like one. No sane person would say there's "no real evidence that Joe Biden is a pedophile".

This lady names the perps and goes into detail about why they do what they do.

With. Zero. Evidence. It's anecdotal. It's CLAIMS. It's some old coot TALKING about what she believes.

ESOTERICshade ago

Nope. She is citing known works. You are not well read enough on the subject to know and are not objective. If I decide to call him on his bias in the future it will be bullet proof and you can bet i'm smart enough to do it. Good night. I have nothing to say to you about anything. No need to try to talk to me.

Crensch ago

Nope. She is citing known works. You are not well read enough on the subject to know and are not objective.

OP isn't citing the sources, just hand-waving to a video that cites other sources. Can you read, ESOTERIC?

"EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link." - Rule 2

If I decide to call him on his bias in the future it will be bullet proof and you can bet i'm smart enough to do it.

No, you're not. You can't even read the rules, apparently.

Good night. I have nothing to say to you about anything. No need to try to talk to me.

Realizing you're wrong, and trying to ride off into the sunset with such a pathetic exit monologue... yep. You think entirely too highly of yourself.

ESOTERICshade ago

You're the one that can't read the rules. Look at all these factual claims that broke rule 2 that he did nothing about. But this was his hero Trump so instead of enforcing the rules he just gleefully celebrated in his pro Trump thread. This link below is blatant too. Cannot be denied, except by, of course, by you. I notice you didn't address it, but just "rode off into the sunset."

https://www.voat.co/v/pizzagate/2588737/13018147