Could be a LARP. The people behind this can't be trusted. Why trust them? Why aren't some of them diverting resources to protesting outside of the WalMart in Texas where children are being held, and even a Senator can't get in to check on them? Why is no one even talking about that?
And it could be aliens. And considering they are in AZ, wouldn't going to TX to try and get inside a place a Politician can't get in, be a bigger waste of resources?
I suggest you learn a bit more about Sawyer. He's a solid dude.
I suggest you learn a bit more about Sawyer. He's a solid dude.
I don't agree here. Imo he's fishy. I don't trust him. That said, when the VOP are based in Tuscon, it would be natural to do their work there, wouldn't it?
We just need many people vetting different sites/leads. And yes, we should continue to looking into the Walmart story.
I think we probably won't find out what purposes the site they found near Tucson served.
I'm starting to change my mind somewhat. More is needed to be known here. I'm suffering from some cognitive dissonance and information overload. Too much information to process + work + life.
I hate the fact that I am having to retract some things, but the psyops are getting very sophisticated. I'm starting to think that one of the two narratives is false CEMEX/Sawyer or Wal-Mart.
I haven't had time to really dig into either one of them to watch body language etc., but my current bet is WalMart is disinfo, Sawyer is legit. @Honeybee_ did some vetting of Sawyer when he first got involved in Pizzagate. He is genuinely trying to help the kids.
Also, when he first got involved, there was a massive shill attack brigade that spammed every thread about him, produced multiple smear threads trying to discredit him, etc. The same shit they did to @PleadingtheYiff@abortionburger and other genuine investigators. Which, incidentally, they've never done to Alex Jones or George Webb.
Walmart in Brownesville TX is true, although, it is a former Walmart converted into an US Department of Health and Human Services facility, vetted yesterday <3
"US Senator Refused Entry to Facility Holding Migrants' Kids"
- New York Times
"Merkley was accused of grandstanding by Victoria Palmer, a spokeswoman for the Department of Health and Human Services' Administration for Children and Families.
It was out of concerns for "the safety, security and dignity of the children" that Merkley was barred from entering the Brownsville facility, Palmer said in an email.
"No one who arrives unannounced at one of our shelters demanding access to the children in our care will be permitted, even those claiming to be U.S. senators," the statement said.
Through a contractor, the agency is caring for the children being held in a former Walmart with blacked-out windows in Brownsville, a city along the Mexico border.
Thanks for that. I meant Merkley's visit to the "WalMart" was disinfo (an attempt to push the Trump is trafficking kids narrative), not that the facility was fake. :-)
Have you read the current thread about CS, Vin? It pretty much sums up what I've always thought about him. Plus my gut feeling / spider senses are always alerted when I watch him.
When Honeybee_ has a different opinion - for reasons whatsoever - ok, but I'd rather trust my own vetting.
TL;DR: Even when someone is smeared by the wrong people, he can still be fishy. That's not mutually exclusive I'm afraid.
view the rest of the comments →
V____Z ago
Could be a LARP. The people behind this can't be trusted. Why trust them? Why aren't some of them diverting resources to protesting outside of the WalMart in Texas where children are being held, and even a Senator can't get in to check on them? Why is no one even talking about that?
Blacksmith21 ago
And it could be aliens. And considering they are in AZ, wouldn't going to TX to try and get inside a place a Politician can't get in, be a bigger waste of resources?
I suggest you learn a bit more about Sawyer. He's a solid dude.
think- ago
I don't agree here. Imo he's fishy. I don't trust him. That said, when the VOP are based in Tuscon, it would be natural to do their work there, wouldn't it?
We just need many people vetting different sites/leads. And yes, we should continue to looking into the Walmart story.
I think we probably won't find out what purposes the site they found near Tucson served.
Blacksmith21 ago
I'm starting to change my mind somewhat. More is needed to be known here. I'm suffering from some cognitive dissonance and information overload. Too much information to process + work + life.
I hate the fact that I am having to retract some things, but the psyops are getting very sophisticated. I'm starting to think that one of the two narratives is false CEMEX/Sawyer or Wal-Mart.
Vindicator ago
I haven't had time to really dig into either one of them to watch body language etc., but my current bet is WalMart is disinfo, Sawyer is legit. @Honeybee_ did some vetting of Sawyer when he first got involved in Pizzagate. He is genuinely trying to help the kids.
Also, when he first got involved, there was a massive shill attack brigade that spammed every thread about him, produced multiple smear threads trying to discredit him, etc. The same shit they did to @PleadingtheYiff @abortionburger and other genuine investigators. Which, incidentally, they've never done to Alex Jones or George Webb.
@think-
Honeybee_ ago
Walmart in Brownesville TX is true, although, it is a former Walmart converted into an US Department of Health and Human Services facility, vetted yesterday <3
"US Senator Refused Entry to Facility Holding Migrants' Kids" - New York Times
The facility is called Southwest Key Programs run by UNIDOSUS
Vindicator ago
Thanks for that. I meant Merkley's visit to the "WalMart" was disinfo (an attempt to push the Trump is trafficking kids narrative), not that the facility was fake. :-)
Honeybee_ ago
Oh I see, haha, sorry I posted in haste!
think- ago
Have you read the current thread about CS, Vin? It pretty much sums up what I've always thought about him. Plus my gut feeling / spider senses are always alerted when I watch him.
When Honeybee_ has a different opinion - for reasons whatsoever - ok, but I'd rather trust my own vetting.
TL;DR: Even when someone is smeared by the wrong people, he can still be fishy. That's not mutually exclusive I'm afraid.
Blacksmith21 ago
I'm inclined to agree with you Vindy. I've made a personal challenge to withhold judgment as best as I can for a few days ; )
Vindicator ago
Yep. "Hope for the best, prepare for the worst" is always the best policy.