Pizzagate related as it concerns a major media corporation's attempt to normalise child rape. The SJW writers of Solo: A Star Wars Story (it is important to bear in mind that the degenerate filth that is the cult of social justice has been attempting to normalise child rape for a number of years) declared the character Lando Calarissian to be pansexual. For those unfamiliar with the term, a pansexual is someone who is sexually aroused by everything, including children. Given that the Star Wars franchise has always been considered family entertainment and that parents may very well take their children to see this film, to have a very well regarded character therein be openly sexually attracted to (among other things) children is clearly an attempt by the pro child rape Cultural Marxist pond life who created this abomination to normalise and popularise such disgusting behaviour. The video below from the 'World Class Bullshitters' Youtube channel contains a very well worded letter of complaint to the CEO of the Disney Corporation from an erstwhile fan.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eXD29NP-xEA
view the rest of the comments →
AxolotlThanksaLotl ago
Pansexual means attracted to people regardless of GENDER. It doesn't mean attracted to children, just like being gay/straight/bi doesn't mean you're attracted to children, and I don't think Donald Glover or anyone else involved with writing his character is dumb enough to think that.
urbanmoving ago
No it doesn't it means besutality, rape, incest, pedophilia and mruder, Gender is fake word artificially instituted it wasn't even hardly used before the 90's sex is sex, gender is a myth. A false semantic with incorrect attributes...
AxolotlThanksaLotl ago
Pansexuality, or omnisexuality, is the sexual, romantic or emotional attraction towards people regardless of their sex or gender identity. Pansexual people may refer to themselves as gender-blind, asserting that gender and sex are not determining factors in their romantic or sexual attraction to others.
urbanmoving ago
"Volume 2 of Cavendish's Sex and Society, however, states that "although the term's literal meaning can be interpreted as 'attracted to everything,' people who identify as pansexual do not usually include paraphilias, such as bestiality, pedophilia, and necrophilia, in their definition" and that they "stress that the .."
AxolotlThanksaLotl ago
Exactly. Just like women who identify as straight, for example, don't usually consider being attracted to little boys a part of normal heterosexuality. Can some people abuse a term? Yes, of course. Do most people abuse these terms? No, thankfully not. So getting mad about Lando being pansexual is like getting mad about him being gay, or straight, or bi.
urbanmoving ago
Nope I disagree, this notion of moral relativism is the problem with apathy, its clearly not understanding the lust factor Pan always mean anything(ANYTHING). Any sane person should be offended by turning the swaggering Lando into a demented freak.
AxolotlThanksaLotl ago
Pan doesn't have any more of a 'lust factor' than straight/gay/bi. I think you should be more worried about the creepy old 'straight' dudes that are attracted to little girls, tbh, or the dudes that think it's OK for them to be attracted to teens, as long as they're over 18. That's a 'lust factor' if I've ever seen one. Look, we don't have to agree on the pansexual thing, but I think people on this sub need to pick their battles better. I don't think complaining about Disney including pansexual characters, whatever you think of that, is going to do any good. Spend your time researching people who are actually abusing others, not people who use a term that you think is nasty (I feel pretty confident saying that I don't think Donald Glover, nor anyone involved with writing Lando as pan EVER thinks of the term as 'being attracted to children').
urbanmoving ago
You are showing your cards here, Pedophilia is intrinsically linked to "gays". This "attractions" bullshit is absurd. Do you no know I deny the demonstrably false premises of this modern garbled tyranny of words? "Attract" implying the will doesn't exist implying motivations of violence abuse and self pleasure at the thought of nasty shit isn't the real reason.
"Have nothing to do with them" "Those that call good evil and evil good" You need to study some real history and engage in correct reasoning before. The failed psycho kosher bable at attempting to rationalize the evil, profane, and disgusting. Nothing but mealy mouthed Finders "free thought" like derivatives of insanity. Not buying, I never did.
AxolotlThanksaLotl ago
Welp, ok then, I can see there's really no point engaging in this further. You keep thinking"gays" are evil, I'll go about my day as usual, and that's that.
urbanmoving ago
Of course not everything I said is historically and factually accurate, your attempt to whitewash and lie ignoring human realities and honesty is pathetic. Lust is core at the issue and such "liberalistic" nonsense you spew is totally fraudulent, it was in 5 BC it was in the 19th Century and it was in 1948 when Kinsey started his jewish rampage. "Muh Rights" get real....its wat right vs wrong....get over yourself and your delusions.