You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

auralsects ago

2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link.

totally abused, way too vague. add that 'common knowledge' is defined as what a 6-month lurker of the sub would know, which would include most of the big names/orgs/topics listed under rule 1.

PEOPLE ARE STILL MAKING LINK POSTS by merey adding one line of description for it. especially with "school teacher/priest in Bumfuck, Idaho/Chimichanga, Mexico arrested" <----a post has to have ANALYSIS OR CLEARLY DEMONSTRATED RESEARCH BEHIND IT, maybe 1/10 of Q posts pass this test.

since Q-fags maintain that everything political INCLUDING pizzagate is subsumed by Q they should stay in THEIR OWN SUB.

repeat offenders making way too many threads per week like @migratorypatterns should have their posts deleted, even arbitrarily

think- ago

repeat offenders making way too many threads per week like @migratorypatterns should have their posts deleted

LOL. So people who do many posts to expose pedos are 'repeated offenders'? But I can see why you would write that.

You said growing up without a father was worse than being sexually abused, and childless white women should be put in a dungeon and raped until they had given birth to three children.

So maybe people should keep this in mind when reading your proposals to change rules. LOL.

auralsects ago

So people who do many posts to expose pedos are 'repeated offenders'?

"CDAN posted this. I think its this. heres some articles about him." that is not exposing pedos, you silly cunt.

You said growing up without a father was worse than being sexually abused

...because that fact ALSO increases the odds of being sexually abused by a whopping 900% as I sourced in the comment.

childless white women should be put in a dungeon and raped until they had given birth to three children.

truth

think- ago

Well, you called out @migratorypatterns as someone who posts frequently. And I can't remember that they ever did a post about a CDAN blind.

you silly cunt

Pro-tip: People won't take you seriously when you try to insult them or other users.

But I'll forgive you, I'm generous today. :-)

Blacksmith21 ago

You're nicer than I am. One of these days I will run across @oralsex. It always happens. And when it does: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HjUC_sgyWi0

SchlongKeyhote ago

I told you I live in south LA and you said youd come by since you travel so much. I'm guessing your forty lbs overweight and haven't fought in decades. it will be a DELIGHT, COME AT ME BRAH

srayzie ago

@Blacksmith21

It’s funny how he’s guessing your 40 pounds overweight and you haven’t fought in decades.

Dudes in his 50’s. Engaged twice to MEN. But never married. His keyhote characters he used to play the younger role. His Equineluvr profile was his more authentic self. Of course, still an asshole.

SchlongKeyhote ago

So even after finally realizing everyone is as antisemitic as me you cling to this idea that I am Equine? Why don't you accept my offer to show months of DMs between Us? I know why:

That would force you to state a concrete logical standard of evidence, which you are utterly incapable of doing. One could believe I faked a few, perhaps a dozen, anticipating being called out some day. But months and months? Is that believable? Without first asking for OTHERS' opinions you will never offer Your Own.

Because you are a woman. Incapable of independent thought and insecure about that fact. It is really sad and I have often felt genuine pity for you, like watching the special Olympics.

srayzie ago

Between you and your Equine alt? Because there has never been an us.

SchlongKeyhote ago

LMAO OBVIOUSLY BETWEEN ME AND MY SUPPOSED ALT WTF WOULD MESSAGES BETWEEN ME AND YOU PROVE?? WTF LOL classic crayzie.

srayzie ago

Obviously I don’t have the conversation. “Equine” told me. I don’t even care. Go away.