2: Empiricism: EACH factual claim that is not common knowledge must be sourced with a link.
totally abused, way too vague. add that 'common knowledge' is defined as what a 6-month lurker of the sub would know, which would include most of the big names/orgs/topics listed under rule 1.
PEOPLE ARE STILL MAKING LINK POSTS by merey adding one line of description for it. especially with "school teacher/priest in Bumfuck, Idaho/Chimichanga, Mexico arrested" <----a post has to have ANALYSIS OR CLEARLY DEMONSTRATED RESEARCH BEHIND IT, maybe 1/10 of Q posts pass this test.
since Q-fags maintain that everything political INCLUDING pizzagate is subsumed by Q they should stay in THEIR OWN SUB.
repeat offenders making way too many threads per week like @migratorypatterns should have their posts deleted, even arbitrarily
repeat offenders making way too many threads per week like @migratorypatterns should have their posts deleted
LOL. So people who do many posts to expose pedos are 'repeated offenders'? But I can see why you would write that.
You said growing up without a father was worse than being sexually abused, and childless white women should be put in a dungeon and raped until they had given birth to three children.
So maybe people should keep this in mind when reading your proposals to change rules. LOL.
you just called me a shill pedophile, filthy slag. and youre complaining about insults??
btw no one has named more pedos than me nor given as many concrete addresses. I struggle to think of anyone here whose research even competes with mine.
view the rest of the comments →
auralsects ago
totally abused, way too vague. add that 'common knowledge' is defined as what a 6-month lurker of the sub would know, which would include most of the big names/orgs/topics listed under rule 1.
PEOPLE ARE STILL MAKING LINK POSTS by merey adding one line of description for it. especially with "school teacher/priest in Bumfuck, Idaho/Chimichanga, Mexico arrested" <----a post has to have ANALYSIS OR CLEARLY DEMONSTRATED RESEARCH BEHIND IT, maybe 1/10 of Q posts pass this test.
since Q-fags maintain that everything political INCLUDING pizzagate is subsumed by Q they should stay in THEIR OWN SUB.
repeat offenders making way too many threads per week like @migratorypatterns should have their posts deleted, even arbitrarily
think- ago
LOL. So people who do many posts to expose pedos are 'repeated offenders'? But I can see why you would write that.
You said growing up without a father was worse than being sexually abused, and childless white women should be put in a dungeon and raped until they had given birth to three children.
So maybe people should keep this in mind when reading your proposals to change rules. LOL.
auralsects ago
"CDAN posted this. I think its this. heres some articles about him." that is not exposing pedos, you silly cunt.
...because that fact ALSO increases the odds of being sexually abused by a whopping 900% as I sourced in the comment.
truth
think- ago
Well, you called out @migratorypatterns as someone who posts frequently. And I can't remember that they ever did a post about a CDAN blind.
Pro-tip: People won't take you seriously when you try to insult them or other users.
But I'll forgive you, I'm generous today. :-)
SchlongKeyhote ago
you just called me a shill pedophile, filthy slag. and youre complaining about insults??
btw no one has named more pedos than me nor given as many concrete addresses. I struggle to think of anyone here whose research even competes with mine.
think- ago
P.S.: I only quoted you. When others think you're a pedo shill, based on your quotes, I can't help it. :-) :-)