Reminder that there were no 'known pedophile code words' in the podesta emails. Also in the decades worth of emails John Podesta only ever wrote the word pizza once. If you believe the pizzagate theories then you have poor critical thinking skills and are a part of a witch-hunt.
Since you have obviously taken the time to confirm this yourself to make such a hold statement, a link to your mountains of research would be nice. Also, as a good comp to test your methodology in determining this so called 'fact,' please refer to my many many previous posts and let me know EXACTLY how you are able to see that I am or am not, a black belt. When you can accurately define my status, I will listen. Until then, you are just another game player. We're here to investigate. Not play.
No, the burden of proof is on those that make the claim. If I made the claim that you were a black belt the burden is on me to provide the evidence that shows that. Considering that we are talking about heinous crimes of child abuse the bar for evidence to make any kind of accusation relating to such serious accusations is obviously extremely high.
I have researched the claims myself and have asked this community specifically about the code words in two separate posts [link]. They came up with no evidence toward their claim and subsequently a mod erased a mention of them being 'known pedophile code words' in the executive summary.
So the burden is on you to provide me with the mountains of research.
-walnut sauce (very possibly used as code)
-pizza related map (definitely code, likely pedo)
-dominoes on pasta (definitely code, likely pedo)
-sacrifice a chicken to moloch (definitely code, likely pedo)
-friends grandkids in the hot tub for entertainments (definitely pedo, no code)
Also:
Luciferian talk? For sure. Also confirmed for spirit cooking. Pedo associations: brother’s art collection, Alefantis (my favorite pedo), majestic ape show, Sasha lord, more...
That’s more than enough to justify the conversations found here, IMO. Healthy skepticism is welcome tho.
Thank you for the reply, although I would still like to hear from the person I was asking. But the things you listed aren't evidence they are just assertions. You say "pizza related map (definitely code, likely pedo)" but where is the evidence for this claim? If you are making a claim that is as serious as child abuse you should have sufficient evidence to back that claim up. This is my problem with pizzagaters is that they jump to conclusions based on extremely superficial evidence. Does the wording in that email sound suspicious to you? Then say that and leave it at that. But you say it is 'definitely code, likely pedo', where is the evidence for this then?
My research brought me to the memoirs of an NYPD police officer, the statements of Shia LeBouf’s dad and an undercover FBI investigation in NAMBLA. I’m sorry, I don’t have time to link these things for you here: I’m at work. I am sure that these things have been discussed on voat, which means you can use the voat search features (however, I don’t know how to use well).
The point of my comment was, that you can follow from the premise that you are reading a code... dig into similar language found elsewhere and connect the statements to a pedo subculture. You are right to be skeptical. Don’t take the anger seriously. This platform is always under attack, and everyone here is angry and frustrated about these crimes.
view the rest of the comments →
JUNOAK ago
Reminder that there were no 'known pedophile code words' in the podesta emails. Also in the decades worth of emails John Podesta only ever wrote the word pizza once. If you believe the pizzagate theories then you have poor critical thinking skills and are a part of a witch-hunt.
Z11Mama ago
Since you have obviously taken the time to confirm this yourself to make such a hold statement, a link to your mountains of research would be nice. Also, as a good comp to test your methodology in determining this so called 'fact,' please refer to my many many previous posts and let me know EXACTLY how you are able to see that I am or am not, a black belt. When you can accurately define my status, I will listen. Until then, you are just another game player. We're here to investigate. Not play.
JUNOAK ago
No, the burden of proof is on those that make the claim. If I made the claim that you were a black belt the burden is on me to provide the evidence that shows that. Considering that we are talking about heinous crimes of child abuse the bar for evidence to make any kind of accusation relating to such serious accusations is obviously extremely high.
I have researched the claims myself and have asked this community specifically about the code words in two separate posts [link]. They came up with no evidence toward their claim and subsequently a mod erased a mention of them being 'known pedophile code words' in the executive summary.
So the burden is on you to provide me with the mountains of research.
Z11Mama ago
In other words, you can't prove shit. Good to know.
GreenDell144 ago
-walnut sauce (very possibly used as code) -pizza related map (definitely code, likely pedo) -dominoes on pasta (definitely code, likely pedo) -sacrifice a chicken to moloch (definitely code, likely pedo) -friends grandkids in the hot tub for entertainments (definitely pedo, no code) Also: Luciferian talk? For sure. Also confirmed for spirit cooking. Pedo associations: brother’s art collection, Alefantis (my favorite pedo), majestic ape show, Sasha lord, more...
That’s more than enough to justify the conversations found here, IMO. Healthy skepticism is welcome tho.
JUNOAK ago
Thank you for the reply, although I would still like to hear from the person I was asking. But the things you listed aren't evidence they are just assertions. You say "pizza related map (definitely code, likely pedo)" but where is the evidence for this claim? If you are making a claim that is as serious as child abuse you should have sufficient evidence to back that claim up. This is my problem with pizzagaters is that they jump to conclusions based on extremely superficial evidence. Does the wording in that email sound suspicious to you? Then say that and leave it at that. But you say it is 'definitely code, likely pedo', where is the evidence for this then?
GreenDell144 ago
My research brought me to the memoirs of an NYPD police officer, the statements of Shia LeBouf’s dad and an undercover FBI investigation in NAMBLA. I’m sorry, I don’t have time to link these things for you here: I’m at work. I am sure that these things have been discussed on voat, which means you can use the voat search features (however, I don’t know how to use well).
The point of my comment was, that you can follow from the premise that you are reading a code... dig into similar language found elsewhere and connect the statements to a pedo subculture. You are right to be skeptical. Don’t take the anger seriously. This platform is always under attack, and everyone here is angry and frustrated about these crimes.