You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

runningbear ago

Apparently, one guy who was trying to research here, had his stuff removed.. So trying again with this archive link. very fishy if it was removed! HEre's a pic of that users post, it was first so just scroll a bit but here for convenience.

https://kek.gg/i/3rQDPs.png

Vindicator ago

Hi @runningbear. We have been working with Voat board owners to clarify exactly how to post research into CP safely. Here is our Policy on dangerous research. You needed to submit this as a Discuss post that could be edited with appropriate warnings (Link posts cannot be edited -- they're just a headline).

We had some confusion, which we are clarifying right now, as to whether @truthseeker_'s post which you linked to, was removed appropriately. I believe it should have been left up, since it mostly followed the stated policy. I am confirming the policy is correct, since CP was found on the site by one of our mods.

Please note that we don't allow posts about the administration of v/pizzagate on the main board -- they have their own special subverse, v/pizzagatemods. Given your comment here I am replying to, that appears to be the purpose of this post. Particularly since the chan material you have included a link to is spreading false claims:

I have been banned on voat for asking help on this.

Neither you nor @truthseeker_ have been banned. Here's the ban list: https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/manage/bans/

While I believe truthseeker's post was removed erroneously, I also suspect these two posts were a deliberate attempt to disrupt and undermine this board, and smear mods. Not only did you include this false information posted elsewhere, truthseeker_ jumped on @Crensch and called him a pedo for removing what he thought was a link to CP. That was probably an attempt to provoke a ban.

This much shit-stirring is really not a good way to help the kids.

As for @think-'s removal of this thread, it is legit under Rule 5 and the Voat User Agreement via the Dangerous Research policy because it is not a Discuss post. That's on you.

runningbear ago

Hey also wasnt saying it was truthseeker that was banned, but that An Anon in the thread on 8ch SAID they were banned form voat when they brought that to the site. Wasnt' saying I was banned either....

Again, no arguments here from me removing the posts, youre doin your job... I was just concnered that, from teh rules, it seeme dlike things you remove are reported to LE...so... :( ...