You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

think- ago

Hi @ bdmthrfkr, mod here... ;-)

Could you please edit the body of your text and add an 'imo' between 'Q' and 'he is.....'.

...since we haven't any actual proof who Q is.

Thank you!

I'll flair the post with 'Edit Warning', you'll have 24 hours to edit. Please ping one of the other mods once you'll have edited, and reply to this comment. Thanks!

If you won't edit, we will unfortunately have to delete the post after 24 hours.

bdmthrfkr ago

Instead of changing my post to "IMO" I have asked full chan for proof of Q's existence, when enough verification in that thread exists I will post a link to it. Q is very real, this is not a LARP and he is close to President Trump.

If nobody comes up with proof enough to satisfy you in the next 24ish hours then you can delet the thread, Q group needs people to look over these records and this is the perfect marriage between law enforcement and researchers.

Also, I don't think that it will take those autists 24 hours to satisfy you, then you can get to helping end this menace which preys on our children.

Vindicator ago

Hi bdmthrfkr,

It isn't that @think- is trying to prevent Q research from being posted. It's that we have a very specific ruleset here in v/pizzagate, possibly the most shilled spot on the internet, because we are constantly under attack by disinfo purveyors and trolls (which you have just experienced in the responses to this very thread), while simultaneously being bound by Voat's anti-censorship policies. We have to require sourced evidence for every major claim (Rule 2) in order to remove genuine shitposts pushing baseless BS to discourage and distract citizen investigators and activists. Also, it makes every research post here 100x stronger and thus more able to support, as you put it so well "the perfect marriage between law enforcement and researchers."

I am very glad you've asked the anons to gather some of this. I look forward to seeing it. In case it doesn't appear in the next 24 hours, here are a number of previous threads that have demonstrated that Q does very likely work directly with President Trump:

Also I put this little thumbnail of Q bonafides together a while back:

Seven proofs of Q

  1. Q interacts with Trump's tweets to demonstrate access
  2. Predicted NYC bombing would happen and be neutralized
  3. Predicted Hawaii missile attack false alarm
  4. Was aboard AF1 during Trump Asia trip
  5. Foreknowledge of Pope wanting to change Lord's Prayer
  6. Foreknowledge of Twitter dickpic expose
  7. "Do you trust the Chain of Command?"

bdmthrfkr ago

Thanks Vindicator, I think that you answered your own question about whether Q is relevant or not. I did pull down the post though so this is not an issue, and yes, I did notice the ferocity and speed of the bad guys as soon as I put this up. You may have noticed that I do occasionally post in other places on Voat and have a bit of experience with shill response time and resource allocation, this post really put a bee in somebodies bonnet, kinda made me a bit proud tbqh.

Anyways, keep up the good fight, you are being noticed in very high places regardless of what some other people may say.

Vindicator ago

Oh, there is no question in my mind that Q is relevant! LOL I've made numerous stickies here spelling out why -- always to the same chorus of concern trolls you just witnessed.

I'm sad you pulled down the post...that removes all the content, and I was going to use some of it in a piece I am working on. Oh well. Was there a particular reason you took it down?

this post really put a bee in somebodies bonnet, kinda made me a bit proud tbqh.

Yep. Heh heh. There is no tastier salt than the crying when Q posts are made here.

keep up the good fight, you are being noticed in very high places regardless of what some other people may say.

This would be glorious if true. Many of us here have given up a lot of our personal lives to research and document and defend that research from trolls. Not just time, but often relationships with those who think we're nuts. :-) I was just saying to another user here that one day we may look back on these times the way WWII survivors look back on D-Day and their time in the Nazi Resistance.