You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

think- ago

@darkknight111, I will unfortunately have to take this post down, as the Twitter page you linked contains a link which leads to a pastbin list of child porn sites.

I was alerted that they are still active. We don't allow linking to incriminating material; a list of child porn sites also is incriminating material.

You can delete the first link and repost. Please get back to me or @Vindicator before you re-submit.

Thank you.

rooting4redpillers ago

@think-, a couple of questions (hoping they're not stupid questions)... Why would it not be better if @darkknight111 just deleted that link, instead of you taking down the whole post? If it's better that you delete the post, will it then reside in "Removed submissions" with the offending link remaining?

think- ago

Yes, thank you, @rooting4redpillers, we are currently discussing the issue with @Vindicator, and will check with the Os, too. I will let the post stay until they will have decided what to do.

Your question is not stupid at all, thank you for pinging me! :-)

darkknight111 ago

Axed the twitter link. Well I feel stupid. Thought we'd be safe if I didn't show the pastebin file of all the takedowns. May have ended up finding something more useful from this anyway (the potential motherlode regarding CGI).

Vindicator ago

darkknight111, I have DMed our O's for clarification, but my understanding is that including that Twitter link is perfectly fine so long as people are warned what they are getting into.

darkknight111 ago

Gonna start linking to that stuff 13Buddha suggested, for that is a potential gold mine of new evidence we could use. The "motherlode".