Regarding "Q" and PG. Why did we never consider that he may simply be a Psy-op, providing positive PR for the current POTUS and his goons? "Arrests are JUST around the corner". (pizzagate)

submitted ago by djklbd

Has anybody else considered the repercussions of unifying the alternative online community around an unverifiable anon like Q? Especially taking something as serious as our investigation into global human trafficking into account?

We know how smart the social engineers are, and they most certainly could have used the intelligence agencies to cook up a fake anon, who appeals to our cause of "taking down the New World Order", but ultimately acts as a disinformation agent and provides positive PR for the current government.

If we all look to an anonymous internet user as our "messiah" (which would likely be the aim of this potential psyop), think of how this could affect our cause/investigation. The "False Prophet" routine is a favorite of theirs, and we shouldn't be so quick to trust this stuff as absolutely legitimate. Many of you have shown skepticism regarding Q, and I truly admire that, as I felt I was a lone voice in this whole thing.

Seems like they are playing upon our desperation for a "savoir", somebody to round up all of the bad guys and make them go away. I actually believe Trump was selected by the elites and presented to us as a savior under this psychological basis, and creating and linking "Q" to him only fuels the psy op that he is on our side.

I think they're pumping some people full of hopium, playing upon their desperation for somebody to put these people in jail. But, what if it's a fake revolution that they created, to lead us astray and divide the community?

Please, consider practicing some skepticism regarding Q, and ESPECIALLY regarding Trump as an "outsider" to the establishment. We need to be on our toes at all times, skeptical (but not overly paranoid) of any event or any person who blows the whistle or is hailed as a demagogue for our cause, like Q currently is.

I'll end with this; We don't need, and have never needed a political demagogue like Trump or Q in our corner to defeat the global crime syndicate. We can do this on our own, by reaching the masses and winning the hearts and minds of the people who are still asleep. We've made lots of progress over the past year and a half, just keep an open mind and remain skeptical at all times of intelligence agency psy ops and disinformation agents.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BClkIOc5iWA

Keep up the good work gents. Love to all.

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

SoldierofLight ago

The biggest argument that Q followers seem to have is that Q is red pilling so many many people. I'm not seeing it. For all the energy invested in Q, researchers could have been tracking down actionable locations where children are being held rightthisminute. And the Q followers-- I'd bet most of them voted for Trump. In today's news, Trump is urging a ban on bump stocks. What would Hillary have done in his place if she'd won? She'd be urging a ban on bump stocks.

I could go on and on, but you made many good points. Thank you for the post. I'll enjoy it for as long as it's still up.

SoSpricyHotDog ago

For all the energy invested in Q, researchers could have been tracking down actionable locations where children are being held rightthisminute

Ehhh, I'm going to have to disagree on that one... we had over a year of straight up PG connections/digging, and not once did any leads point to the discovery of locations where children were being held captive.

I don't think the time invested in Q's posts has slowed down the efforts to continue that research... I think the leads themselves slowed down from what used to be a rapid (10+ per day) pace.

carmencita ago

Amen. Well said. If Trump goes through with this Bump Stock Proposal we shall see how many Rep. vote for it. And Dems will never pass Gun Control because they love the money they raise railing about Murder and Mayhem. I don't trust either side, they are only working for themselves. Upvoat.

Shizy ago

I do not agree with banning "bump stocks" because it's always a slippery slope of the left wanting more bans and regulation, however, as a gun owner and 2nd A supporter who lives in a very pro gun area and associates with gun enthusiasts I can say that no one I know really cares about bump stocks. No one I know uses them because they are silly and just waste ammo. You can achieve the same "action" by looping your thumb through your belt loop so this whole "gotta ban bump stocks" is just dumb. It's not going to make anyone safer or prevent any other mental ill, psychotropic Med taking loser from murdering innocent people if he really wants to.

With that being said, a part of me thinks Trump may know this and is foolishly trying to appease the lefties by "giving" them some token thing. At least I hope he is just doing this out of foolishness and not because he is not as supportive of gun rights as he clams. And you are spot on about the left not doing anything because they love the money and fear mongering ability is brings them!

carmencita ago

Since I have volunteered for Dem candidates, I can't tell you how many requests I get a week asking for money for Gun Control. Feinstein, Durbin, Pelosi, Duckworth, Quigley, MO, BO, Biden, etc. In the Trash. Thought about asking them to not send, but I like to see them waste their money. They will never vote in favor of outlawing any of them. End of Campaign Cash. Never gonna happen.

Shizy ago

Oh I bet! When I was registered as non partisan I was hit up with propaganda by both sides! Not for money but to vote with their agenda. They are like vultures

carmencita ago

I never sent money for that. Somehow I was sitting on the fence and had not been red pilled yet. Glad I kept my cash. Not sending any of them even $1 anymore.

GreenDell144 ago

Most of us would still be oblivious if Hillary had one... But as to the rest of your comment... Thats totally reasonable. There arguably as much red pill value in Podesta's tweet responses as in Q posts.

SoldierofLight ago

But ask your friends, relatives, neighbors-- Who is John Podesta? They can probably give you an answer if only to say they know the name but aren't sure exactly who he is. Ask them, Who is Q? Blank stares, I bet. If you actually do this, ask around I mean, I would be sincerely curious to know the responses.

djklbd ago

I'd bet most of them voted for Trump

That's why I think this is specifically targeted toward them in particular.

Thank you for the post. I'll enjoy it for as long as it's still up.

You're welcome. Simply sharing my thoughts here. And yea, I hope TPTB of this sub consider letting an alternative viewpoint stay visible for awhile.

SoldierofLight ago

If it doesn't happen, please repost in Pedogate or Pizzagatewhatever.