You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

think- ago

Thank you, @kevdude, and @Crensch, for appointing me as a mod, and thank you, @Vindicator, for suggesting and supporting me.

It's great to be part of the team, and I will be gladly serving the community as best as I can.

The pizzagaters are an awesome crowd, so glad I joined.

I am here to help

Please feel free to DM me anytime - with questions, requests for help or any criticism you may have.

Please remember that everybody is here for the kids, and every contribution is welcome - be it comments, link-posts, or research posts. Also, there are many who lurk and redpill friends and family. They too, do valuable work.

I would like to thank @Millennial_Falcon for all the work he has done. Millennial, I hope you will stay on the board, I look forward to your input.

This is my first day as a mod, so please bear with me. ;-)

JusticeforAaron ago

I would like the mods to understand that all people come to conclusions in different ways. I imagine, with you, you think first and logically come to a conclusion. For me, I see through intuition. I am led or guided to things and also by precognition. You don't have to believe that but evidence supports that in my history. I rely on very logical thinkers to help fill in the gaps after I find something. There are also those autists that have keen powers of observation. If we take a stance where only one type of approaching this is valued, we all lose.

Oh, many of the people you guys consider schizo or whatever can also be people who have been under mind control, been abused etc. Try to be more open-minded.

think- ago

Justice, we are all different, and each of the things you mentioned - logical thinking, intuition, and even precognition - have its merits.

If you write something, and are not sure whether it meets the 'logical' approach of the rules, there are many people here, including me, that will help you with that. Also, you can submit posts to v/pizzagatewhatever first, and invite people to add comments and suggestions. When it meets the guidelines, it can be crossposted to the main sub.

The submission rules mirror the logical approach, because this is the one most people can relate to. They are not meant to discredit people gifted with intuition, they just reflect the common denominator.

JusticeforAaron ago

I can do it myself and many people who are logical have said I'm logical as well. I've studied science at a university level and know how the scientific process and how to present information information in a logical way HOWEVER I'm not patient enough to waste my time researching and writing it out (I have many high rated research posts here but I always delete my accounts because I get pissed off) when there is a possibility that it's going to get deleted without even being read as MF did and admitted to doing. PGwhatever is a good suggestion but not everyone looks there, also I like my research archived and put together before putting it out there as people can cover their tracks. I've literally seen info being pulled down as I posted. I'm not the best researcher but I have something to contribute and I find it annoying how everyone is expected to conform to some rigid formula. I do understand there are standards to upkeep and guard and rules to follow but those rules are also HIGHLY subjective.