Q goes PizzaGate (pizzagate)

submitted ago by EricKaliberhall

I know many of you believe Q is a Psychological operation (Psyop), constructed by the Powers that be. Or the LARP of the century. I fully understand that, because what is occurring right now, is so surreal and exceptional that the only words I can think of is; life truly is stranger than fiction.

Exposing PizzaGate/PedoGate has always been and continues to be our main objective. It is hard, not only because most of western society seems to be asleep or brainwashed (probably both). But also because of the true horror and evil the individual must open oneself up to too comprehend.

Think children. Think slaves. Not my words, it's from Q. Now we are fast approaching PizzaGate territory. John "Skippy" Podesta and Comet Ping Pong. https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/10037 https://i.pinimg.com/originals/e6/ef/1f/e6ef1f20de436063a9c9f85726de3d27.jpg

I will let Sean from SGT Report explain in this short YouTube clip... https://m.youtube.com/watch?list=LL23DMOAcgnBpDxTvEaG-ubQ&t=1s&v=IhnTx_XZosk

I'm not trying to change anyone's opinion about Q, believer or not. What I am thinking about is how we will interact with individuals that will come here wanting answers. If Q is their RedPill, maybe they will be discouraged to interact with us (ask questions) if the common opinion here is that Q is bogus, and believers are shills or just plain stupid. The consequence of the scenario stated above goes against our main objective. Is my risk-analysis over-analyzed?

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

cutelobster ago

What does being "woken up" mean? "Woken up" to what? The phrase is too vague for the pressure it's being asked to bear. Much of what the Q-team refers to is already common knowledge. Widespread pedophilia is common knowledge. People trafficking is common knowledge. Modern slavery is common knowledge. Much or all of the political system is corrupt: that too is common knowledge. So what is the special part of Q's message that, going beyond common knowledge, is so important? The idea that Trump is a saviour? This is a major part of the Q-message and it is obviously false. The idea that there is some kind of (hot) civil war going on between American intelligence agencies? Don't see any definite evidence of that. Does the Q-team seem concerned about the influence of AIPAC on American politics? Does the Q-team seen anxious to expose the role of American-Israeli dual citizens and CIA/Mossad in 9/11 (and many other projects)? Not so much. There are clear indications that the Q-team links to Wikileaks/Cicada/Anonymous i.e. the CIA. Why are the CBTS people on 4chan linking to Luciferian propaganda films? Including a propaganda film made in 2012 which predicts Trump's presidency? That doesn't mean anything? If you're not interested in whether or not Q is a psyop then you're not interested in whether or not you're being deceived. And while you may be a good person you definitely aren't 'awake'.

srayzie ago

To us it’s known. That’s what it means to be awake. We are aware. The average everyday person does know know all of this and they won’t find out watching mainstream media. They will start waking up when people are sharing with them over social media because a lot of people go there.

Pizzagate discussed in a forum isn’t going to reach people unless we are taking what we know and showing the world. It’s people like us that need to expose it!

argosciv ago

So what is the special part of Q's message that, going beyond common knowledge, is so important?

Jealous(because can't see beyond the veil)

Does the Q-team seen anxious to expose the role of American-Israeli dual citizens and CIA/Mossad in 9/11 (and many other projects)? Not so much.

Jew-hate obssession, despite that it also being 'common knowledge', that there are corrupt Jews in the mix, also.

Same tired old routine...

cutelobster ago

The jump you make from what I was saying to 'Jew-hate obsession' is absurd. For the record (and I Imagine you're probably keeping some), I think anti-semitism is ridiculous. I mentioned American-Israeli dual citizens - included on that list, for example, would be Henry Kissinger, Richard Perle, Richard Haass, Douglas Feith, Paul Wolfowitz, John Bolton, and Dov Zakheim. Any of these names ring a bell? Obviously the list could be much expanded. Do you think there might be a problem if many members of the U.S. Government/state apparatus were American-Iranian dual citizens? Or even American-French dual citizens? Might not a question of conflicted interest arise in, say, matters of foreign policy? Might there be a problem if a group lobbying for a foreign power, like AIPAC, managed to exert an enormous grip on both political parties? I think it might be a problem - and if the Q-team is as interested in rooting out corruption as you and others claim you would think it would be just the kind of thing they would be interested in exposing. But just as Wikileaks - with all its supposed whizzbang hacktivism - hasn't exposed what really happened on 9/11, the Q-team, with all its supposed insider knowledge, doesn't seem inclined to either.

argosciv ago

The jump you make from what I was saying to 'Jew-hate obsession' is absurd.

Not really... It's not very nice, I'll admit that, but, the reason is based on commonly observed behaviors;

For the record (and I Imagine you're probably keeping some), I think anti-semitism is ridiculous.

Yes, I take note of many things, not literally writing them down though. Glad that's your thoughts on the matter, I apologise for jumping the gun - we do get jew-hate trolls in here from time to time though, I was quick to assume.

Any of these names ring a bell? Obviously the list could be much expanded.

Yes & Yes

Do you think there might be a problem if many members of the U.S. Government/state apparatus were American-Iranian dual citizens? Or even American-French dual citizens? Might not a question of conflicted interest arise in, say, matters of foreign policy? Might there be a problem if a group lobbying for a foreign power, like AIPAC, managed to exert an enormous grip on both political parties? I think it might be a problem

I'm inclinced to agree, the key word is "might", though; Is there already policy in place to prevent dual-cit holders from taking up a govt position? If it comes to a need to 'ban' Govt officials from holding dual-cit, then by all means, [Trump et al should] do what needs to be done in order to keep things clear and transparent.

(Bolding added in next quote, by myself, for emphasis)

I think it might be a problem - and if the Q-team is as interested in rooting out corruption as you and others claim you would think it would be just the kind of thing they would be interested in exposing. But just as Wikileaks - with all its supposed whizzbang hacktivism - hasn't exposed what really happened on 9/11, the Q-team, with all its supposed insider knowledge, doesn't seem inclined to either.

You're going to hate me for this, but, per Q's words:

"You have so much more than you know"

argosciv ago

For what it's worth, happy to be wrong and I will read and reply to your comment in full, just having a jolly good laugh at other stuff that's happened while I was asleep - I will delete this reply and replace it with a detailed one shortly.