You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

nameof ago

@Are_we__sure Did you look at the photo? My point is that it recognizes code not words, and that's where the nefarious results are hidden. It's not like bots sit there and tap out code. Is that what your saying?

darkknight111 ago

He's a liberal shill. He's not here to actually fight pedos or contribute anything of vague usefullness. He's here to defend them.

Given that this is a blue pill moron who thinks MSM is a valid source (hint: its actually fake news), I'm not surprised.

Just do what we would do to any shill and hit that down arrow on sight. Him having 3+ accounts is further evidence of being a shill.

nameof ago

I didn't know that abt 3 accts that's interesting.. he or she regularly attaches comments to my posts that " are not useful" at all,
But responding to him in the main thread, not personally, seems to keep me from over engaging in an argument or something stupid...like with at sober second thought. (Don't say the name) but yeah, I did respond to back up the post here that this search speaks for itself and is unlikely bots ( muh Russians!!! ) bc it's the word child followed by mostly garble and a garbled missing letter way to spell S X. (Sex) I forget I can downvoat now too. It feels so mean. But 3 accounts That's a problem.

GreenDell144 ago

Didn’t know all that, either. There are plenty of useless comments and commenters here. Your strategy is best. Just keep separating the wheat from the weeds, so to speak.