The UNDERBELLY of GOOGLE SEARCH (pizzagate)

submitted ago by nameof

This is just one example. For now for another of reasons mostly I'm still just on a ohone doing this. When I throw those gibberish words I saw before into a search, I started with GUVAX XAFAR because I had seen them in the article about the gibberish comments to those negative kids videos on YouTube... I also put S X because I had seen that before in one of those articles about tag words bringing up child porn, and the voat post about Imgsrc bringing up child porn or innapropriate...etc.. I have used a search program too where asterisk is wildcard, so why not try using space bar as wild card?

anyway... I had been searching in the upper address bar. Watching what Google brains was offering me as per what words I was entering and taking screenshots all the while...when it wasn't really going anywhere then I insdvertently pushed Enter which I hadnt wanted to do but it ended mey curser up in the lower search bar inside the page of results when it opened. I went to put the cursur back up to the address bar when that inside search bar gave these results. That's exactly how I got this result. I took this screenshot.. small boy with woman Small boy and girl in love little boy and woman love movie.

Just doresnt sound like it's gonna take anybody to any good place. Thoughts?

https://ibb.co/ip5aBH

nameof ago

@GreenDelll144 100% agreed. About needing to find a simple way to break into the code. I think it will be simple when we get it.

And are we sure is good for its own set of reasons, the first being we are not an echo chamber, and we CAN see and judge for ourselves.

And lastly I think r we sure is on some agency payroll. Yes I know, no proof. But the incessant attempts to be wry ending with a warning to report innapropriate shit to the authorahtahs...kinda telling, kinda kneejerk, kinda sad.

nameof ago

@Are_We_Sure I realize you didn't look at the screenshot which IS MY POST, but your talking alot. I wrote that I started with GUVAX XAFAR yet if you bothered to look at the screenshot you would have notice the phrase or code or whatever it is that I typed, which is right there for the looking at IN RTHE SCREENSHOT, had evolved...I started with GUVAX XAFAR but ended up with what I got... I don't even remember something like fabx (?) Anyway it changes as I go. That's how I work with the ALGORYTHM it allows me to use a letter I then go with that, it won't allow some letters so I have to back off that track. I just go with what the computer gives me from one starting point. Also I told you, I STARTED IN THE TOP ADDRESS BAR PUSHED ENTER ENDED UP IN THE RESULT PAHE SEARCH BAR,, and that's where the evolution of guvax xafar found it's fruition. Got it. Not Bot.

So what your image is telling us is when GUVAX XAFAR is used, it probably appears on pages that have the descriptions you mention. And "Google may know this," but that doesn't mean any human at google knows what GUVAX XAFAR is

GreenDell144 ago

I think the premise of your post is perfectly reasonable. They logically must have code, ergo: we need an enigma machine to break it. As for are we sure... his comments are sometimes helpful to steer us away from an echo chamber. We aren’t gonna do much good if this becomes some kind of mob witch hunt. I have often read something that he posted and corrected myself. That said, I often disagree with his opinion or his tone. His facts are usually reasonable and checkable. I’m not sure if are we is male or female, but I put male pronouns anyway, sry. Don’t take him too seriously, and feel good if your ideas still stand after some criticism.

nameof ago

@are_we_sure as I said look at the screenshot. There is no bot discussion. This is apparently human activity. That's why I posted it. u r pretty dense.?

nameof ago

@Are_we__sure Did you look at the photo? My point is that it recognizes code not words, and that's where the nefarious results are hidden. It's not like bots sit there and tap out code. Is that what your saying?

Are_we__sure ago

That is done algorithimically. Are you familiar with the power of algorithims? It does not have to go through human hands. For example, if people search happy Tuesdays on Google, you get results like this
https://i.pinimg.com/736x/a2/11/32/a21132a06e27923b461444410fd7d7ad--happy-tuesday-quotes-tuesday-morning.jpg

But if you search Happy Mondays you get results like this

http://louderthanwar.com/wp-content/uploads/Happy+Mondays+-+Angel+-+5-+CD+SINGLE-126591.jpg

This is because the algorithim has learned that Happy Mondays is a phrase associated with a British Band based on which pages people select when they search for that term and how many pages link to the band when using the phrase Happy Mondays.

The bots just go out a scrape content and enter it in Google's database. Then Google's algorithim analyze this page and compares it with other pages in its database. These databases are far too enormous to be humanly processed and categorized.

So what your image is telling us is when that text is used, that is probably the text on those pages. And "Google may know this," but that doesn't mean any human at google knows what GUVAX XAFAR is.

Look up google algorithm or search engine algorithm to see how this works. Google enormous market share and value is based on the fact that learned how to do search better than the existing companies. I'm sure there is an enormous amount of math and computer science behind what you see when you enter a term.

GreenDell144 ago

This is reasonable, too. Now take it a step further. If the OP found GUVAX XAFAR in the comments of a suspicious video, then it must have meaning between the poster and at least one reader. It could be a personal message hidden in a public space, or a wider message to a specific group or condition. People wrote it and read it there, and a google algorithm may help us find the meaning in just the manner you describe. It’s not complete nonsense, because the OP has found some suspicious results, hinting at a possible meaning for at least one of the weird comments that were found.

darkknight111 ago

He's a liberal shill. He's not here to actually fight pedos or contribute anything of vague usefullness. He's here to defend them.

Given that this is a blue pill moron who thinks MSM is a valid source (hint: its actually fake news), I'm not surprised.

Just do what we would do to any shill and hit that down arrow on sight. Him having 3+ accounts is further evidence of being a shill.

nameof ago

I didn't know that abt 3 accts that's interesting.. he or she regularly attaches comments to my posts that " are not useful" at all,
But responding to him in the main thread, not personally, seems to keep me from over engaging in an argument or something stupid...like with at sober second thought. (Don't say the name) but yeah, I did respond to back up the post here that this search speaks for itself and is unlikely bots ( muh Russians!!! ) bc it's the word child followed by mostly garble and a garbled missing letter way to spell S X. (Sex) I forget I can downvoat now too. It feels so mean. But 3 accounts That's a problem.

GreenDell144 ago

Didn’t know all that, either. There are plenty of useless comments and commenters here. Your strategy is best. Just keep separating the wheat from the weeds, so to speak.

Are_we__sure ago

You know how google and other web searches work right? then just send out bots to find pages and index their content. The vast majority of all their search results do not go through human hands.

huhWHAThuh ago

I stopped using google several years ago when it became clear they were giving totally prejudiced results. Several times i double checked with other search engines to make sure i was using correct language and got credible returns on the same copy/paste search words. I occasionally use google by accident without thinking, and notice from the results that i made the mistake. Without doubt google has removed the "no" from their motto of "do no evil".

elephantdoesntforget ago

Their motto 'do no evil' is apparently ironic.

GreenDell144 ago

More like “do you know evil?”

FreeRebel ago

My thought is that YOU ARE SMART. You came up with a really different way to look for this stuff. And it looks like you got a hit.

GreenDell144 ago

I agree. All of my electronics are work related, and I work at a school, so I am not in a position to investigate in this way. My thanks to you for taking action. I also commend you for your creative strategy. We need to catch up to these criminals and expose. Maybe this is on way they stay ahead of things; no words and incomplete acronyms, etc.

nameof ago

Yes.WHAT U SAID.

Dickface808 ago

Wowzers!

carmencita ago

bf 10 years old is another tip off. bf meaning boy friend? Could be best friend, but with those other things, I would go with boy friend. Def something strange. I never use google. Hate it.

nameof ago

So foul...errr. fuck me to u stop baby talking. Ok .