Whether Q is a larp or a psy op can be disputed. What can't be disputed any longer is that Qanon is joined at the hip with the president.
Last night about midnight Q posted the following two phrases. Catch & Release, and Safety & Security, in quotation marks.
After which Q said, Coincidence? Have you learned how to read the message? Q
Subsequently, at 4AM in the morning (Saturday morning the 27th) POTUS released the following tweet.
"Thank you to Brandon Judd of the National Border Patrol Council for his strong statement on @foxandfriends that we very badly NEED THE WALL. Must also end loophole of “catch & release” and clean up the legal and other procedures at the border NOW for Safety & Security reasons." Bold emphasis mine. These are the EXACT same phrases that Q posted.
Trump's tweet (twitter link). https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/957220637705109505
Q link. https://qcodefag.github.io/ (Scroll down just a tad.)
For more details, or if you're more "visually" oriented, watch this short clip.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RaZf5Iazczo&feature=youtu.be
There can be no doubt any longer whether Q is a high level POTUS insider or not. For those who sill maintain that Q is a larp, what is the endgame? Again, there can no longer be any doubt he knows what Trump will tweet beforehand, and has proven so over and over again. This example is probably the most "blatant," or obvious, so far.
view the rest of the comments →
User890020 ago
The guy in he video got his timestamps wrong.
Q's post was AFTER POTUS's.
It wasn't 12:09 AM
Q's post was obviously REFERENCING the tweet.
bopper ago
I haven't heard that. Has he made a retraction? He's an honest guy and will if that's the case. The timestamps work for me, I got them from the Q board and the actual POTUS tweet. Q posted at midnight, Trump at about 5 the following morning.
User890020 ago
You mean, 00:xx instead of 12:xx?
bopper ago
I'll check. If that's the case then the point of Q's comments would have been the "catch and release" part, referencing the catch and release of the Saudi Prince. Just as amazing.
rarepeeks ago
So now that the time stamps may not be what you thought, you just change the meaning around to fit whatever you need it to fit to make a miracle out of Q? Using that logic that world makes no sense in a hurry. I do not understand that sort of logic. Honestly it is painful to watch.
bopper ago
Both points are referenced in the video. If one is wrong it does not invalidate the second. Correct? I chose, in my post, to emphasize only one of these. An admission of an error by a youtuber doesn't invalidate the plethora of evidence that supports Q. What is (seriously) painful to watch is Q bashers' "condemnation w/out investigation." If you (or anyone) don't have time to thoroughly check out the Q phenom then you should refrain from commenting. I understand that most / many do not have the time.
rarepeeks ago
Well, with all due respect, I do not think so. When one "Q was right!" answer is found to be inaccurate people are just changing the answers to one they like better and there is no real proof of most of it other than confirmation bias. Not to mention the fact that if you are correct about who Q is with, that means Q is under the wing of government. The government puts out propaganda 24/7 to the public. That means the government has taken control of part of the truth community. That is not a good thing.
bopper ago
There is so much more to it, and you are missing out. But if you're w/ the "we are doomed and all is lost and Trump is compromised" crowd then Q is not for you.
But fair enough, I'm not going to be of further help to you, and vise versa.
rarepeeks ago
I'm cool with having a different opinion on it. We are still on the same team :)
bopper ago
Very good, thanks for being civil about it all :)