Whether Q is a larp or a psy op can be disputed. What can't be disputed any longer is that Qanon is joined at the hip with the president.
Last night about midnight Q posted the following two phrases. Catch & Release, and Safety & Security, in quotation marks.
After which Q said, Coincidence? Have you learned how to read the message? Q
Subsequently, at 4AM in the morning (Saturday morning the 27th) POTUS released the following tweet.
"Thank you to Brandon Judd of the National Border Patrol Council for his strong statement on @foxandfriends that we very badly NEED THE WALL. Must also end loophole of “catch & release” and clean up the legal and other procedures at the border NOW for Safety & Security reasons." Bold emphasis mine. These are the EXACT same phrases that Q posted.
Trump's tweet (twitter link). https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/957220637705109505
Q link. https://qcodefag.github.io/ (Scroll down just a tad.)
For more details, or if you're more "visually" oriented, watch this short clip.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RaZf5Iazczo&feature=youtu.be
There can be no doubt any longer whether Q is a high level POTUS insider or not. For those who sill maintain that Q is a larp, what is the endgame? Again, there can no longer be any doubt he knows what Trump will tweet beforehand, and has proven so over and over again. This example is probably the most "blatant," or obvious, so far.
view the rest of the comments →
cutelobster ago
You're using the pronoun 'he' for 'Q'. That can be disputed - the Q-posts are likely put together by a group of people. Different editors have been used - this is fairly obvious because the writing-style of the posts has radically altered at times. The Q-group likely is linked to the 'Trump-group' - yes, but that's hardly a surprise since the Q -group is always engaged in fervent Trump hero-worship. On one level, Q is just an unorthodox press-office. Also do we have to maintain the fiction that Trump is behind all his own tweets? He almost certainly has people doing that for him - most or all of the time.
upvoatinggoat ago
and the git hub is questionable
bopper ago
I'm using the pronoun he for convenience. Yes, Q apparently seems to be more than one person. Don't know if Q's posts have necessarily been "radically" different at times. Dan Scavino probably does Trump's tweets, after consulting w/ others (including POTUS).
As far as unorthodox press office, yes, and what a press office it has been, and continues to be, in terms of behind the scenes revelations. That's the crux of the matter, what of the revelations? (Being rhetorical.)
cutelobster ago
Fair enough about the pronoun, but plenty of people do/did think Q was an individual, perceived Q to be some brave broadcaster of truth from the heart of the beast. The Q-project is full of these slippery twists of language and perception. If I say to you, listen, there's this high-level official inside the Japanese government leaking explosive information - they don't have a real name they just call themselves after a symbol and they are using the language of riddles, it might all sound very glamorous and exciting - very John LeCarre. But if I say to you instead, listen there's a public relations team dispensing propaganda on behalf of the Japanese government by combining the Socratic method with social media, it doesn't sound quite as good. When we hear about someone 'leaking' information, we imagine they are taking a risk with their personal safety, doing something which may damage their bosses, like Snowden and Manning supposedly did. But Q is not leaking in that sense. What he/she/they/it is/are doing is government-approved. That was not the impression which was generated at the beginning (and I don't think that's an accident.)