To move this to the realm of the hypothetical, when you say they are different men, you are jumping to a conclusion.
It's a conclusion that ignores several other possiblities. Remember this isn't an artist looking at a man. It's someone describing a man to an artist to draw. It's by no mean a perfect process.
Other possibilities for having two sketches that don't look like the same man.
Neither witness got a good look at the man.
They witnesses simply remembered the man differently
One of the witness was better at describing the man to the sketch artist by the other.
They saw this man at night once and described him to an artists....a long time later, correct? Is that the sequence? Because if so, it probably would be unusual for the sketches not to be accurate.
Without knowing more about the exact details of this, it would be very hard to say anything conclusive.
The police say it's one man as described by two witnesses. Any reason why that is not the truth?
Right, two witnesses, two absolutely different descriptions, and somehow the split of the two descriptions came out podesta bros. Not making an argument or anything here, just appreciating the WTFness regardless of the any reasons.
other bit of wierdness was the security firm run hired by the family was run by a conman. The conman was supposedly not directly involved in the efits, that was another investigator. However the conman was quite familiar with American lobbying firms. In fact, he was closely connected to Patton Boggs a competitor to the Podesta Group.
view the rest of the comments →
pby1000 ago
Those are different men. The facial structure is too different, especially the jaw.
Are_we_sure ago
To move this to the realm of the hypothetical, when you say they are different men, you are jumping to a conclusion.
It's a conclusion that ignores several other possiblities. Remember this isn't an artist looking at a man. It's someone describing a man to an artist to draw. It's by no mean a perfect process.
Other possibilities for having two sketches that don't look like the same man.
Neither witness got a good look at the man.
They witnesses simply remembered the man differently
One of the witness was better at describing the man to the sketch artist by the other.
They saw this man at night once and described him to an artists....a long time later, correct? Is that the sequence? Because if so, it probably would be unusual for the sketches not to be accurate.
Without knowing more about the exact details of this, it would be very hard to say anything conclusive.
The police say it's one man as described by two witnesses. Any reason why that is not the truth?
SterlingJB ago
Right, two witnesses, two absolutely different descriptions, and somehow the split of the two descriptions came out podesta bros. Not making an argument or anything here, just appreciating the WTFness regardless of the any reasons.
Are_we_sure ago
other bit of wierdness was the security firm run hired by the family was run by a conman. The conman was supposedly not directly involved in the efits, that was another investigator. However the conman was quite familiar with American lobbying firms. In fact, he was closely connected to Patton Boggs a competitor to the Podesta Group.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/fraud-suspect-kevin-richard-halligen-allegedly-posed-as-a-spy-and-cheated-the-elite-on-both-sides-of-the-atlantic/2012/06/09/gJQA3gdwQV_story.html?utm_term=.d39697c99e7c