You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Blacksmith21 ago

Excellent Srayzie! God's work. Keep in mind that "this" (social media, Voat, etc.) are a form of battlefield. We are on one side (truth) and others are on the other side (shill, evil, DS).

We don't get too many Voaters in the middle who say - "wait a second, this doesn't make sense...what about this fact and that fact" to counter the narrative. What we get from asshats like @flaxom who vomit walls of text with hypothetical arguments which lead to nowhere. Never any fact. Then they forum shift/slide. Then attack.

It is very obvious who the shills are. Even normies do not behave that way. Only shills do. The Hitler Youth Homos, the Racine is Corrupt crew, and the random bottom feeders like @flaxon.

As far as Q being real, I HIGHLY suggest everyone start at the beginning of the Q feeds and read backward. Look through the lens of hindsight. Things make more and more sense each day.

flaxom ago

What am I shilling exactly? Common sense, brainpower, critical thinking? Please do make use of those things.

You're the one telling people, without providing any evidence, that they're supposed to buy into some fucking bogus narrative that's CLEARLY DESIGNED AS DISINFO. So you're the one shilling, and slinging your tired insults at me only proves it. You could convince me that Q was real like I've asked but instead you deflect, insult, and keep on shilling your psyop like a little faggot.

Blacksmith21 ago

https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2353063

Spend some time with the links at the bottom. Then come back with an argument that involves more than ad hominem attacks backed up by nothing other than "fucking bogus", "designed as disinfo", "tired insults".

You do realize - or maybe you don't - that you are using every "trick" in the book to float your argument. I have a better idea - why don't you pick one of the more specific Q posts and show evidence which disputes it?

I won't hold my breath...

flaxom ago

You're asking me to prove a negative. I'll just say that any specific prediction Q has made has fallen flat, which is what I said in a previous post. I've also refuted each of those links at the bottom of the linked post, with very little effort. Feel free to argue with me about it there if you want.

We all want the things Q is talking about to be real, and I suspect much of it is. But Q conveniently leaves out a lot of critical facets and also leaves the bulk of the messaging up to interpretation, which only strikes me as intentional misdirection.

Blacksmith21 ago

Yawn.

flaxom ago

Oh look, it's that guy who can't defend his crazy fanfic religion.

Blacksmith21 ago

LOL. You are starting to get funnier. Keep on. We're waiting for the punchline...

flaxom ago

I don't see why we should really be arguing about this. You seem personally offended that I don't buy into the Q thing, even though I've given you a lot of chances to convince me. We are on the same side even if we disagree about this, so I feel kinda bad going so hard on you about it.

flaxom ago

Seems worth noting that about 60% of the original post there is about completely unrelated stuff to the pope or catholicism or anything. He goes on about Bin Laden and gun control and then drops the prayer at the end exactly as you would traditionally do with that prayer to ask for protection and blessings. Then nearly a month later the pope mentions the same prayer... and that's it? The pope didn't mention Bin Laden or gun control at all, and apparently the purpose of him even mentioning the prayer isn't important enough to even put into this graphic. So there's apparently no connection there at all unless I'm missing something.

The second Q post in the image doesn't seem to have any meaning. He's referencing the prayer, but only by asking why it was mentioned. Is there something to the version that was posted that makes that relevant? That also seems like it would be important to include in the graphic, and if there's no significance there either then what does any of that possibly prove? The implication is that Q knows the pope is connected to the pedophile elite and... wants to reword a prayer?

Blacksmith21 ago

I'm not offended. Offer something tangible other than hyperbole and walls of words which mean nothing. Try a specific post, as referenced previously in @vindicator post and dispute its accuracy.

Pretend for a second that you have experience in intelligence matters.