You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

migratorypatterns ago

I think you've touched on a valid point and getting some pushback for it.

I just ran into yet another article about a celebrity kid that was transgender. He started his own organization and gave credit to Mr. Harry Hay! Yes, Mr. Man-Boy Love/NAMBLA/pev himself! It was sort of tragic, not only because this kid actually talked about how much he admired Harry Hay, but because there was this humongous hickey on his neck in the pic. The doting celeb mom seemed to take no notice of the blotch on her kid's neck, nor that he was praising a POS.

I'm a prime example of someone that feels that the gay movement was pushed and used to normalize -- and eventually legalize -- pedophilia. I didn't think twice about supporting an adult making his or her own decision about who they wanted to love and/or marry and so I was right there -- voting my little heart out on this concept of being free to choose who you wanted to love and giving rights to gay individuals/couples. It really did open a Pandora's box because the gay population is not adequately separating themselves from pedophilia and predation of minors. Forget about adequately, they're not doing it at all!

So now you have gay pedo couples free to adopt children and abuse them at will, you have grooming going on and having people tell you it's okay, movies made about it, sex toys featuring children hitting the marketplace, and now the emergence of a pedo/gay sex ring in PedoWood -- or as Bill Maher puts it -- a gay mafia:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=alBqpQpimrs

Notice how TMZ covers this story with the lots of laughs and playful cartoon music in the back. It's all to the normalize the idea and Gaslight Maher while reporting on this at the same time. They treat the subject lightly -- gays in a mafia? What do they force people to color coordinate or something? But there are the stories that emerge. Do you think Michael Egan was taking this as a joke while he was being repeatedly raped and threatened with a gun to his head? Yeah, isn't that just funny guys! No need to cover the story as if it were serious or anything.

I remember from reading the ole Bible that it outlines gays and what was taking place. It made reference to how they'd rape anything, this while being infested with every known disease. I think back to what I read about the AIDs epidemic. Gay men were having sex with hundreds of sexual partners ... hundreds. They also were being treated for multiple sexual diseases that we concurrent and cumulative. The idea broached at the time was that the multiple partners/diiseases had something to do with the breaking down of the immune system, but that was pooh-poohed. Was it dismissed because alter the promiscuity?

Having said that, there are gay men I work with and know that are wonderful people so this is not an indictment. I've stated here that I will NEVER vote for another gay/transgender person because of this forced politicizing of the issue and because of the manor travesties that have occurred because of this broadening of definitions and doing away with needed boundaries of what people could do and what they couldn't do. And, no .... I don't fucking care how many celebrities tell me that children can choose who and how they express love, CHILDREN DON'T HAVE THE RIGHT TO CHOOSE SEXUAL PARTNERS OR ENGAGED IN SEX! Just NO!!!!

So then why am I choosing not to vote for a segment of the population when I just said I do not believe every single gay person is a blight on the planet? Because, and let me use all caps to make this real real clear: BECAUSE THE GAY COMMUNITY ITSELF NEEDS TO SEPARATE ITSELF FROM THE EXTREMIST SICKOS WHO THINK PEDOPHILIA IS OKAY AND WANT IT/ARE WORKING FOR IT BECOMING LEGALIZED!

That's what I need to hear ... see ... it needs to happen. If the gay community wants to continue to embrace all, I continue to withhold my vote and will give that vote to someone more conservative in thought. And that's the way it was going to be. And that's sad. Why? Because I worked with this one gay guy who had an abusive dad. What compounded it was that his dad was a priest. He was just to the point of having recovered memories surface and was undergoing counseling to handle it. He was one of the nicest guys on the planet, and I know damn well he would never -- as in NEVER -- want a kid hurt like he was. NEVER. But on the grand scale of things, do I hear this gay agenda-based community echoing this opinion. Nope, sure don't. Not a peep.

That's what bothers me. Groups have to police and speak out about these things. It's how to weed out the swamp creatures .. or Luciferian creatures in this case. It's funny that it's part of this stereotyping of gays as Suzy homemaker, ineffective, timid drag queens that we don't recognize that the population is polluted with degeneracy -- the same as every other group. You think I think all of my group are Mother Theresas? Hell no! There are wife beaters, murderers, thieves, child rapists, and every other type of shithole the mind can conjure into reality.

But I think this needs to be looked at in an objective way. What exactly are the numbers of the gay community that support pedophilia/violence? It's a fair question because we do have an identified cabal terrorizing PedoWood. So are they the tip of the iceberg? It would seem they're part of a bigger cult that embraces rape, murder, and debauchery. So I would plead for us to keep this real and discuss it objectively rather than lashing out at someone who brings up for discussion.

I also have been meaning to post something on others knowing about this current narrative being run. It will include the subject of homosexuality. Again, the notion of equality/rights for homosexuals was the juggernaut to push the insidious shadow into place. This evil cabal have used social issues quite effectively to mask their true intentions, so let's calm down and find out what's going on and not dismiss something out of hand. Who knows? The gay population that only wanted basic rights and were tired of discrimination may find that they've been victimized, too.

Votescam ago

Homosexuals are NOT our sexual abusers of children -- Heterosexual males are 100X MORE likely to sexually abuse a child than a homosexual male. Homosexual males seek adult relationships with other adult homosexuals.

migratorypatterns ago

Yeah, that's why Harry Hay was a member of NAMBLA. People join to protest man/boy love.

There is a pedophile ring operating in PedoWood. Numerous victims have said that it's comprised of gay men. If you don't want to acknowledge that gay men are sexual abusers of children, it's your right, but it does nothing to help solve the problem going on.

Votescam ago

Many people think that if a man rapes a male child that it's because he's a pedophile. Not true. Pedophiles simply have "preferences" ... some for males and some for females. The females are the majority of those abused -- and murdered. 82% female -- 12% male victims. Saudi Arabia obviously different. And the Saudi's proclaim ... "Women for procreation, Men for fun!"...

Many people still think that Sandusky was a homosexual because he raped young boys. He was simply a pedophile. Pedophilia is about the AGE of the victim, not the gender of the victim.

This website is being harmed by low quality posts and very little investigation of any value.

There used to be some very excellent investigators reporting their findings here.
Not so much anymore.

There are a handful of right wingers here who believe anything the GOP and Trump tell them... They're obsessed with anti-feminism, abortion, homosexuality, Jews, "blacks" .... It's pretty clear that they are out of touch with women -- probably addicted to pornography.

Only perverts SUPPORT Nambla.

Despite the 2,000 year lies by the RCC against homosexuals ... it is heterosexual males who are our sexual abusers of children. The Church is also deeply involved in sexual abuse of children as we see over and again.

Heterosexual males, according to studies, seek adult relationships with other adult homosexuals.

migratorypatterns ago

All I hear is yada yada yada. You might as well try to convince me there's a third sex.

I really don't care what pedophiles classify themselves as, but your entire assertion is based on that? These are the same people that contend an eight-year-old girl walking into the bathroom when they're showering is asking for it ... and that an infant in a crib smiled and, therefore, gave consent. You really want to believe what these nut jobs say?

Put succinctly, I don't fucking care what Sandusky thought he was or what excuses he made or rationale he used to rape children. Do not. He's a grown man who raped little boys. If he doesn't want to admit he was a rapist and a homosexual, don't give a shit. If you don't? Don't give a shit either.

Votescam ago

Apologies ... I've had to make two changes to my post which I hope make what I'm saying clearer. I've BOLDED the two references.

It is studies which classify pedophiles -- and it's based on the AGE of the victim ... from infants to teenagers.

You're fixated on NAMBLA ... why? Only perverts agree with NAMBLA.

Why not be concerned that MALES are our sexual abusers of children ... and that they are heterosexual males?

People who rape kids are pedophiles -- not homosexuals.

Read something about it.

migratorypatterns ago

Why not be concerned that MALES are our sexual abusers of children ... and that they are heterosexual males?

People who rape kids are pedophiles -- not homosexuals.

Don't involve ad hominem attacks. What I do or don't do is up to debate. After all, there've been no studies to classify my thoughts/actions, and according to you, we can't use our own judgement in making a determination.

The point is that victims have specifically pointed to homosexual pedo ring running PedoWood. That needs to be gotten rid of and those men need to be in jail. I could care less what a study says and a study that goes by age of the victim to classify whether someone is gay or heteorsexual is suspect from the get go.

NAMBLA is something we all need to fixate on. NAMBLA is the juggernaut that is pushing normalization, more just as importantly, LEGALIZATION OF PEDOPHILIA.

You can see that I've returned the favor. I've bolded and capped the agenda going one further than you. This is my last reply to you. I'm not arguing about this. If you want to protect homosexual pedos by using diversionary tactics where the aim is to get me on the defensive, it ain't working.

Good luck protecting the guilty because they are going to jail with or without your support.

Votescam ago

mig --

Obviously you don't even know what an "ad hominem" attack is...

What you SAY is at issue here -- and it's everyone's business.

Your judgments are based on what you've been taught -- if you're taught to hate, that's the way you think.

Those followers of the right wing come to the simplistic conclusion that if a male rapes a boy ... then he's a homosexual. That's not the way it works. Pedophilia is about the AGE of the victim ... not their gender. Do yourself a favor and read something about it.

Even in the cases of "situational" pedophilia where heterosexual males who prefer sexual relations with an adult female will rape a child, they might prefer to rape a female child ... however they will rape any child ... including a male or female infant.

There is NO way for anyone to suggest normalization of pedophilia..... Age of consent is still 16 I think and it should probably be 18...

And keep in mind we have many, many relationships where males in their early twenties have relationships with young girls ... and wait for them to turn 16. It's a sign of male immaturity, imo ... but it often happens. Should these males join NAMBLA? Often they also get these young girls pregnant the moment they turn 16.

I'm not protecting anyone ... I'm advising you of studies ....

The "Sandusky Syndrome" of thinking that a male who rapes a young male is a homosexual is still wrong. Sandusky was a pedophile.

birthdaysuit11 ago

wtf. Pedo. Why are you even here?