You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

AdmirableNelson ago

If Trump is "one of them", why the anti-Trump media frenzy? Clinton is one of them-- but there was no anti-Clinton media frenzy.

DeathToMasonsASAP ago

The anti Trump media frenzy is intended to show that he is not one of them and is their enemy. Anything he does must be good, like the newest executive order he just did.

AdmirableNelson ago

But is that the most plausible explanation?

DeathToMasonsASAP ago

It is not plausable that they allowed somebody on the ballot that is not their asset. It is not plausable that they allowed somebody to the debates that is not their asset. It is not plausable that he was one of them his entire privldged life, but once he became potus, he doesn't want to play the power game anymore and wants to fight for the little people. It isn't plausbable that he has been a secret society rich entitled brat his entire life, now he wants to take them down. This is theater. You MUST belive he is fighting them, or their next move wont work.

AdmirableNelson ago

It's not plausible that they would necessarily have ABSOLUTE control over anything. It is not plausible that they would always control every ballot, or even most (necessarily, we don't know). You have no solid basis for claiming he was "one of them", beyond the cherry picking, as we've seen. The fact that you are using insulting epithets in lieu of reasoning further diminishes the impression that you have a single valid thought here. Are you okay?

You can certainly paint a picture that fits the conclusion you wish to draw, but you take it much further with this overwrought and unreasonable rhetoric. It happens to be a fact that there is huge volume of propaganda in the MSM that does this same thing. It might be entirely coincidental that your unbiased and sensitive investigation into child trafficking has led you to the same anti-Trumpism that the pedo-trafficking-covering-up MSM also promotes. It could be, I don't know. But you certainly have no case for your urgent anti-Trumpism as being good for anti-trafficking hopes, and I don't think anyone with any big-picture awareness would find you credible in that connection whatsoever.