I feel I've almost been forced to make this posting because of so much misunderstanding regarding addresses etc. I've produced some images that I hope will show things more clearly than my words can.
Let us start with the image that reignited this debate; the girl being dropped off on 11th street. Please see this image https://imgoat.com/uploads/d61ab14322/73593.jpg
And then compare it to this image, which shows that she was walking towards the White house, which is 3516 https://imgoat.com/uploads/d61ab14322/73594.jpg
To put it into some kind of context, this image shows the street addresses in that locale https://imgoat.com/uploads/d61ab14322/73595.jpg
A view from the air, note the number of houses and the house numbers https://imgoat.com/uploads/d61ab14322/73597.jpg
And compare to this image depicting boundary lines for all of those properties, note the numbers and lot numbers https://imgoat.com/uploads/d61ab14322/73598.jpg
Compare to 3518 Rear noting the lot number, owner & boundary (partially hidden, sorry, that box can't be moved out of the way) https://imgoat.com/uploads/d61ab14322/73574.jpg
Compare to 3518 (the address of confusion) noting lot number, owner & boundary https://imgoat.com/uploads/d61ab14322/73575.jpg
Compare to 3516 (the address where the girl was heading to) noting lot number, owner & boundary https://imgoat.com/uploads/d61ab14322/73600.jpg
That should clear up any debate about the girl being dropped off, where she was being dropped off, and who owns the various properties.
Much confusion still remains regarding permits. This is more complicated because clerical errors make it appear that the permits were for 3518 (The property owned by Boris Tochilin).
Here you can see the two owners and two lot numbers 3518 (2833 0099) and **3518 Rear ** (2833 0817) https://imgoat.com/uploads/d61ab14322/73602.jpg
So how do we know there was a clerical error? The permits issue date and detail of work match the permit notice posted on the Pegasus door. Compare this https://imgur.com/aYWfe1Q with the entry second from the bottom that matches it https://imgoat.com/uploads/d61ab14322/73603.jpg
The confusion, or misinterpretation, stems from the fact that someone has entered this work as 3518 and not as 3518 Rear. If you look at the SSL it is the one for 3518, not Pegasus, yet the permit is there for all to see on the door of Pegasus.
I hope that all helps.
view the rest of the comments →
Oh_Well_ian ago
@Yuke is a FRAUD
HE HAS ABSOLUTELY NO PROOF THAT ANY 'CLERICAL ERRORS' WERE MADE IN THE WORK PERMITS AND PRESENTS HIS ASSUMPTIONS AS FACT
LOOK AT THE FILING IN THE PERMITS.
ALEFANTIS' LCC IS LISTED 4 DIFFERENT WAYS !!!
@Yuke HAS BEEN OBSESSED WITH THIS INFORMATION AND HAS BEEN DISTORTING THE FACTS FROM THE OUTSET OF PG
WHY CAN'T HE EXPLAIN THE HOUSE IN QUESTION SELLING FOR $500K BELOW MARKET VALUE?
WHY DOES'NT HE TRACK DOWN THE OWNER AND SEE IF HE IS CONNECTED TO JA OR EVEN EXISTS?
WHY DOES HE ASSUME CLERICAL ERRORS WHEN MANY OTHER POSSIBLE EXPLANATIONS NEED TO BE EXAMINED?
WHY WON'T HE EXPLAIN WHY ALEFANTIS' LLC IS LISTED 4 DIFFERENT WAYS ON THE PERMITS?
WHY DOES HE JUMP INTO ACTION EVERY TIME THE 11TH ST PROPERTY IS MENTIONED ON PG ?
Yuke ago
$500k below market value? Are you on about Pegasus? Pegasus was bought for $200k in 2014 and it's current valuation, with all of the renovations that have taken place, is still only $352,560. https://imgoat.com/uploads/d61ab14322/73640.jpg
Jobew1 ago
Not taking a side but in many jurisdictions assessed values for taxation is sig under market value