Q Anon was developed by the Cicada group, according to the Youtuber, Defango. He claims to have been personally involved in the project, making the somewhat startling assertion that he "wrote half the questions" himself.
The claims were made during a roundtable discussion which was recorded and re-broadcast by Nathan Stolpman of Lift the Veil (who was himself involved in the same discussion.) Stolpman later made a three-hour video centred on Defango's admission. On the later video, Defango is heard making his admission from 35:27-38:00. During Stolpman's three-hour broadcast (which accepts live calls), Defango then rang in to the show and was questioned in a hostile way by Stolpman (2:23:00-2:40.00). Although Defango does not back down from his claim linking the Cicada group to Q he does claim it is old news and goes on to try to justify his involvement with the project.
Defango claims first to have heard of the Q Anon project at the hacker convention, Defcon, which ran from July 30th-August 2nd. He claims it was presented to him there as "the next big thing" and it was from that point his involvement began.
As Stolpman indicates at various points, Defango is not necessarily a reliable source. However, the link between Cicada and Q Anon seems plausible. Defango presents Cicada, (viewed by some as a CIA recruitment tool) as a vehicle for the best minds to solve problems. He presents the Q Anon project as a problem-solving extension of this, using the Socratic method and the puzzle-format as a "way to get people excited" with the ultimate aim of getting out important information.
Whatever about the accuracy of Defango's account, it would seem that the Q psyop is either over or is being moved into a new phase. The fervent Q-supporting stickies on voat have gone (why is that?), the Q posts have slid far down the forum and we are hearing a lot about actress's earrings. Was it all a dream?
Perhaps we should all head to Defcon to hear about the next project.
view the rest of the comments →
awake4646 ago
I'm unclear as to why the CIA would start a campaign to show everyone how corrupt they are and why they need to be dismantled completely.
DeathToMasonsASAP ago
The illusion of legitimacy. The allusion of a working system where they could be investigated and punished. It does not exist. They are selling you that it exist and maybe will happen. Can't happen. CIA , like all spook agencies, work for the banking cartel, not the country they reside in. One of their functions is to control the countries citizens through propaganda, social engineering, mind control, manipulation of events. To completely mislead the citizens about the reality of the government and the world and how things work and who is in charge. So the CIA being brought low is a laugher. They do what they are made to do. Their masters would never punish them for it.
Random101 ago
Q distinguishes between good CIA & bad CIA. The overall tone of Q's posts is that the "ourguys" within the US security apparatus have got it covered.
DeathToMasonsASAP ago
There are no good CIA. They are all trained as occultist, trained by the Nazis. That is the point. Lying is their trade. Once somebody is identified as a spook, they are uselsess as a source of anything but lies. The good guys vs bad guys is a fabrication. They have to fabricate this, because their is no evidence of this, so they have to say it is a secret battle that you can't see, but the will give you daily play by play. Act like adults people. This is idiotic.
Random101 ago
IMO the biggest problem with this subject is a culture like "The Donald is our God Emperor and Q is his prophet". Q's use of the Socratic method suggests positive intent, but it's easy to use it to direct the cbts culture in a direction which suits your agenda.
cutelobster ago
The message pushed by Q, and by those behind him, is that Trump is our saviour - he is about to drain, or is currently draining, the swamp. If, however, Trump is not our saviour (perish the thought) but instead part and parcel of the same cabal as much (or all) of the CIA then the intended effect of Q would be pernicious. There are plenty of examples of other limited hangouts - Q could easily be another or these - albeit a particularly lurid and entertaining iteration.
think- ago
'Q' might have been entertaining, but he (they) unfortunately pushes a false narrative (Trump vs. Deep State) and distracts investigators.
DeathToMasonsASAP ago
There is not a major politician on the political stage that is not theirs. They would never allow your name on the ballot. You would have to be a write in. You would never be allowed media interviews, and a seat at the debates.
Random101 ago
Sure. Just look at the references to GEOTUS (God Emperor of the Unites States). The United States is fundamentally about statism, which could well explain why US politics serves the interests of Theodor Herzl's Zionist state of Israel. It's about the subversion of nationalism and patriotism to racism and fascism and the devolution of theism into humanism.
ESOTERICshade ago
He is not. Until Americans stop believing in the false right/left paradigm Americans will be slaves. Ben Garrison said it best in one simple graphic.
https://files.catbox.moe/l2sh6t.jpg
Psalm144-1 ago
^BINGO!!