You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

SoberSecondThought ago

I agree that the Marines did not storm Langley, that the Podestas aren't at Gitmo, and that Q is a LARP. (See my discussion of Q here.)

But on the sealed indictments, I have to disagree. Most have barely been in place for a month so far. A study of sealed indictments in the federal system showed that only about 50-60 percent are unsealed within a year, and 20 percent are still sealed after five years. And the vast majority of indictments that are sealed, are not for organized crime but for a variety of miscellaneous reasons: medical malpractice, cases involving a minor, and so on. (The odds of an organized crime indictment remaining sealed for a long period are higher, because there are so many more parties who need to be denied access.)

I have said over and over again, this is going to be a long fight. It will take many years. Pace yourselves. And pay no attention to Q, the guy writing that particular disinfo is doing the Clinton gang more harm than good.

ESOTERICshade ago

@SoberSecondThought makes a sneak post in order to post a link to one of his shill posts that nobody will read. I have been against the Q disinfo campaign since day one so accusing me of being a shill for Q only makes you look as retarded as you truly are.

SoberSecondThought ago

I already made the case that you were a shill for HighLevelInsider and for Wisconsin_Is_Corrupt. Your tactical choices at this point are kind of irrelevant. Attack Q, defend Q, you've already blown your credibility long ago.

ESOTERICshade ago

I already made the case that you were a shill for HighLevelInsider and for Wisconsin_Is_Corrupt. Your tactical choices at this point are kind of irrelevant. Attack Q, defend Q, you've already blown your credibility long ago.

You made a case for the fact that you can't even come with a coherent bullshit story, as we all laugh at you. Troll....