What was his wife's name? That's right...Margaret.
Weird.
Love how you site a source yet selectively omit information that discredit's your posistion.
I mentioned the fact that one is British and one is American and I posted a link this his wikipedia page. Searching for "Margaret Sanger" on that page brought up zero results. You do find out about his wife if you search for "Margaret" only. The activist lived and died in America, didn't she? According to wikipedia, Sanger was her first husband's name and both her parents were born in Ireland, so I don't even think she is related to the British guy. Also according to Wikipedia, she did spend some time in Britain in 1914, but the biochemist wasn't born yet. I see no connection between the British Nobel Prize Winner and the American birth control activist. You have the wrong Margaret Sanger.
That's because the Margaret mentioned on the chemist's page is refered to by her maiden name.
Either way, the Margaret mentioned in the original link was a nasty piece of work (as anyone who is a eugenicist typically is), thus her activities are worth looking at.
That's because the Margaret mentioned on the chemist's page is refered to by her maiden name.
Yes, I see that now. But obviously, they are two different Margaret Sangers. Do you now concede the British chemist's wife was not the American activist?
You may want to look into the activist, but will you admit she has nothing to do with the Sanger Institute like you claimed?
Something with that high a mortality rate is a major red flag.
Evolution favors that which is an optimal survival strategy. For parasites, having a very high mortality rate, especially with such a fast progression from infection to death is a very poor survival strategy given the context of a parasite.
Indicative of something that was made in a lab....purely to kill. HIV is suspected to be a bioweapon too, for slightly different reasons.
Note that outbreaks of ebola tend to happen near known bio weapon labs.
view the rest of the comments →
KnightsofHubris ago
What????
What's the reason you believe that?
This is incorrect. The Sanger Institute is named for a British biochemist, Frederick Sanger, not the American Margaret Sanger.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frederick_Sanger#/search
darkknight111 ago
What was his wife's name? That's right...Margaret. Looks like it is you who is incorrect.
Love how you site a source yet selectively omit information that discredit's your posistion.
KnightsofHubris ago
Weird.
I mentioned the fact that one is British and one is American and I posted a link this his wikipedia page. Searching for "Margaret Sanger" on that page brought up zero results. You do find out about his wife if you search for "Margaret" only. The activist lived and died in America, didn't she? According to wikipedia, Sanger was her first husband's name and both her parents were born in Ireland, so I don't even think she is related to the British guy. Also according to Wikipedia, she did spend some time in Britain in 1914, but the biochemist wasn't born yet. I see no connection between the British Nobel Prize Winner and the American birth control activist. You have the wrong Margaret Sanger.
darkknight111 ago
That's because the Margaret mentioned on the chemist's page is refered to by her maiden name.
Either way, the Margaret mentioned in the original link was a nasty piece of work (as anyone who is a eugenicist typically is), thus her activities are worth looking at.
KnightsofHubris ago
Yes, I see that now. But obviously, they are two different Margaret Sangers. Do you now concede the British chemist's wife was not the American activist?
You may want to look into the activist, but will you admit she has nothing to do with the Sanger Institute like you claimed?
darkknight111 ago
The context of the original article was about the Sangar Institute going bad. Comparisons to THAT Margaret and her stance on eugenics were being made.
The original point in posting the article was connections between Wellcome Trust and Sangar Institute.
KnightsofHubris ago
You clearly imply that Wellcome Trust has ties to the activist Margaret Sanger and that is false. You imply the Institute is connected to her.
And this context is not in what you posted? Did you mean Wellcome Trust here?
Are_we__sure ago
Funny coincidence right? His wife died in 2012.
The Margaret Sanger you are talking about was born in 1879 and died in 1966. September 14, 1879 – September 6, 1966
I'm sure you will correct your post.
3141592653 ago
Its been a while!
darkknight111 ago
Something with that high a mortality rate is a major red flag.
Evolution favors that which is an optimal survival strategy. For parasites, having a very high mortality rate, especially with such a fast progression from infection to death is a very poor survival strategy given the context of a parasite.
Indicative of something that was made in a lab....purely to kill. HIV is suspected to be a bioweapon too, for slightly different reasons.
Note that outbreaks of ebola tend to happen near known bio weapon labs.
KnightsofHubris ago
What bioweapon labs are you talking about?
KnightsofHubris ago
Ebola is not a parasite. It's a virus.
But that is over time it doesn't preclude a mutation that creates a highly deadly virus that might not be here in a thousand years.