I've been following Pizzagate since last October. I seem to be in the minority among you in m skepticism for Trump and his establishment. What makes you all trust him so much? (pizzagate)

submitted ago by djklbd

From what many of us are gathering on /pol/ and r/conspiracy lately, we're starting to doubt the "anti establishment" qualities of his presidency.

To me, it seems as if the elite chose him as a populist to appeal to theorists and subvert our effectiveness as the truth movement. We are traditionally skeptical of politicians, especially the presidency.

At seem as if the trust for trump spread once the "alternative media" starter to endorse him. Alex jones, PJW, cernovich,ect. Couldn't these guys be gatekeepers that "flipped" on us?

Here are a few concerns I have with the trump presidency.

  • Trump was financially bailed out by Wilbur Ross, A Rothschild consigliere in 1990, after his failing Taj Mahal project.

When questioned why he helped him, Ross said; "the trump name is still very much a future asset for us"...

How is his Rothschild connection anti establishment in the slightest? Aren't the Rothschilds the evil English banking dynasty?

Also, trump made Ross a cabinet position. Why was this a good move?

http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-wilbur-ross-commerce-20161208-story.html

  • After singing the harms of Wall Street and corrupt bankers, he makes several Goldman Sachs and wealthy billionaires his cabinet members. The point is, he lied to you, turned around, and "got the band back together" so to speak, appointing many of the former bush era cronies in positions of power. Why is this good for us ? Do you trust a Goldman Sachs cabinet? Explain.

https://www.thewealthadvisor.com/trump/goldman-sachs-hogging-trump-cabinet-appointments

  • Why did trump meet in private, and visited the home of known globalist Henry Kissinger? These first 3 alone are fucking incriminating as shit and, reveal to me, a very establishment friendly puppet. Can you explain this? Are you OK with this and why?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/05/16/donald-trump-to-meet-with-henry-kissinger-gops-foreign-policy-eminence-2/

  • Trump often discussed his plan to defeat the "terrorism boogeyman" in ISIS, and often cites his willingness to, as he put it, "bomb the shit out of them and take the oil". Why is he pushing the fake terrorism boogey man to accelerate more illegal war?

Also, why after claiming terrorism was bad, and that Saudi Arabia was a known funder of terrorism (and potential 9/11 involvement), why did he do a multi million dollar arms deal with Them?

https://youtu.be/aWejiXvd-P8

  • You would agree that the CIA is a globalist and evil intelligence agency, correct? Why Is trump saying that the CIA is "great" and "terrific"? Why did he say that he was behind them "1000%"?

https://youtu.be/T4Ej4wXR7cM

  • Why was his Bombing of Syria a strategic move for the betterment of US citizens? Was it not allowed to occur under false pretenses?

Also, after criticizing Obama's policies, how are the continued drone strikes helping make America great again?

  • Finally (I will be editing more, stay tuned), also after criticizing Obama and his waste of taxpayer money to fund vacations and golf trips, is trump already golfing almost every weekend and wasting over $400,000 dollars A DAY for security at the Trump Tower? How are these acceptable to you? Why are you willing them slide.

These questions should be very easy for you to explain, considering your die hard and obsessive support for him as the current POTUS. How do these moves, which many of us consider to be terrible overreaches of power and authoritarianism, benefit our country and help take down TPTB?

http://www.latimes.com/opinion/topoftheticket/la-na-tt-trump-golf-20170327-story.html

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Corwintrails ago

Couldn't agree more. There's nothing more that compromises this forum than to think, of all fucking people, Donald fucking Trump is somehow supposed to be some savior of the children and the abuses against them. How about his many sexual predator comments? This post was a real relief for me, as I was beginning to really call into question the whole bias here. Getting pretty tired of people believing idiot pundits in the far-right who are supposed to represent the abused among us. The advantage here, in my opinion, is the emphasis on CITIZEN journalism, which is by definition not associated with anyone who claims allegiance to the establishment, and that most certainly includes our supreme clown of a president, Mr Trump

SavedbyJCfromRSA_MK ago

Breath of fresh air here today. Thanks all. Having said anything at all defending Trump to friends and family has for me, like I'm guessing plenty of you thrown me into the "he's gone nuts, talks like a bloody republican object of ridicule. We paid a big price holding your hand Sir Highness Donald.

The fight against pedophilia will apparently need to outlast even his magnificent head of orange hair. Never has this couphure appeared before, he's truly unique.

If I were on a jury* with Trump on some trumped up charge but it was a serious capital offense;

and his friendship with Epstein plus the Lolita log evidence, combined with the grab 'em by the pussy....... (note that's in the plural)....... boasting on camera, were allowed as evidence of his character, I'd be struggling with my convictions,

ONLY IF Capital Punishment were in the offering. I got some qualms about that from the Bible. Most of yours didn't have that part but mine still does. Guilty wouldn't be the issue.

  • (Me being on any jury is not likely. After sitting many idle hours, I was summarily dismissed the one time called, by BOTH attorney's agreement. I appeared obviously independent, something like that. A goat among fat sheep. Serious faced crestfallen, I laughed to myself as I walked out feeling once again like a Free Man. Then whistled a happy tune walking down the courthouse hallway,