Just a despicable story. Think I saw something about it when this perv was charged, but he's been booted. Seems he had a work iPad that also contained horrific images. That was the tipping point.
http://truthfeednews.com/dem-politician-forced-to-resign-after-infant-porn-found-on-his-computer/
According to The Philadelphia Inquirer, Ahr was arrested and charged on Oct. 11 with several felony counts. According to investigators, Ahr sent and received hundreds of child porn images since 2014 — some depicting infants and toddlers as well as “sadomasochistic abuse and abuse involving children and animals,” the Inquirer reported.
On Monday, Ahr also handed over a work iPad, which authorities said they had no idea he had possessed after they raided his home.
After retrieving the iPad and analyzing it, authorities said they found additional illegal images on the device. Investigators said Ahr tried to delete the pictures from the device.
view the rest of the comments →
VandalayIndustries ago
Wtf? Toddlers?
CSokolof ago
...and infants
Votescam ago
Our sexual abusers of children are MALES.
Homosexuals are 100X LESS likely to sexually abuse a child than a heterosexual male.
Also note there are "Situational" pedophiles and "Preferential" pedophiles ... http://uspp.csbsju.edu/CrimPsych/CPSG-6.htm
finska ago
There are many statistics that contradict this claim. Here is one; According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics’ (ABS 2005) Personal Safety Survey, 12 percent of women and 4.5 percent of men in Australia report having been sexually abused before the age of 15 years yet only 1.6% of men in Australia identify as homosexual.
Any male who rapes or molests a boy in my opinion is gay or at least bi. However many of the men who do this are not openly gay and many are even married to women as a cover for their secret life. BUT you cannot by definition of their same sex attraction to male boys call them straight. This is how they come up with their numbers of abusers by only counting pedophiles gay if they are 'out'. This is part of the coverup. Listen to abuse survivor and whistle blower David Shurter who happens to be gay himself explain what really goes on.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VY40EGPaZj0YouTube
Votescam ago
finska --
The above says nothing about WHO our sexual abusers of children are.
They are MALES which even the right wing women's group confirms (Family Research Council).
Your statistics do confirm that the majority of VICTIMS are female.
But then you add this: >yet only 1.6% of men in Australia identify as homosexual>
First of all, what this this have to do with sexual abuse of children. As I said in my post, >heterosexual males are 100X more likely to sexually abuse a child.>
Additionally, not all homosexuals are willing to acknowledge being gay. In many areas, it is still dangerous to be homosexuals. I guess the most lasting myths come from "Christianity." After 2,000 years of preaching the "abomination" of homosexuality by the RCC we can't expect it to be reversed overnight.
Many people believe that but it's not what statistics show. A true pedophile is labelled according to the AGES of the children they molest. That's what pedophilia is about ... the AGE of the child.
Basically, from what I've read pedophiles have no actual sexual orientation.
HOWEVER, in the case of "situational" pedophiles, they are men who prefer a relationship with a female, but when there is no female available, they will rape a child -- an infant, toddler.
Many homosexuals were forced by persecution of them into the "closet" ... and many did marry females and some even had children. But that doesn't make them pedophiles. Homosexuals have fought to end their oppression in order to be able to come out of the "closet" and to form open relationships with other adult homosexuals.
What Percent of the Population is Gay? More Than You Think ... https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/what-percent-of-the-population-is-gay-more-than-you-think-5012467/
And I don't have a link to it, but I've read that heterosexual couples have a 30% chance of having a homosexual child.
If You’re a Guy, Having Older Brothers Makes You More Likely to Be Gay http://nymag.com/scienceofus/2016/09/having-older-brothers-makes-you-more-likely-to-be-gay.html
Facts about Child Molestation ....
Re David Shurter ...
Not really familiar with David Schurter -- but if he's gay it seems odd that he refers to gays as "living a gay lifestyle" as most homosexuals (and heterosexuals) think that sexual orientation is a "lifestyle" or choice, but something we came into the world with. We don't consider being heterosexual a "lifestyle." And many of know at very early ages what our sexual orientation is. But, I am taking a look at what Shurter is saying ... and he's discussing the 80's which was also the beginning of AIDS/HIV. In US cases were being reported in June 1981.
finska ago
If 4.5% of Australian men have been molested (yes by men I agree totally on that) out of a population of 20mill people thats approx 450 000 boy victims.
If 1.6% of Australian men are gay thats approx 160 000 gay men in Australia. Lets say 1million to be sure. So 450 000 boys have been molested by 1million gay men.
Straight guys dont want sex with other males old, young or infant- that is the very definition of straight.
On the other hand there are over 9million straight men and 12% of women are molested as children thats 1 200 000 female victims. More overall but not relative to the size of the potentional pool of perpertrators(9mill).
Based on these figures gay men ( or bisexuals) have a much higher likely hood of offending. Gay/Bi 50% chance straights a l0% chance. It sucks either way and I'm not anti gay Im just doing the math.
I believe David Shurter is talking about the 'promiscuous gay lifestlye' and what he saw as part of that crowd ( for example one person hasving 1000s of sexual partners not uncommon) but he clearly states in that video not all gay people are part of the 'lifestyle'.
I feel really sorry for all the good gay men who get unfairly labelled. I know a lot of them would never harm a child but as a society we have to face that statistically this community harbours a higher percentage sexual predators. 🙁
Votescam ago
finska --
First problem you have with your estimate is that FEMALES are 82% of the victims and males 12% according to studies/statistics. That would mean that the 4.5% only represents 12% of the victims of pedophiles. The number of Australian victims if you add in females would be vast.
Second -- usually estimates of homosexuals are underestimated -- 20% is more likely. In fact, I've read that any heterosexual couple has a 30% chance of having a homosexual child. Obviously, Nature sees a need for diversity -- and perhaps also for some control on procreation. Also to provide someone to care for the many children who are orphaned. In fact, in Hawaii before the coming of the white man, homosexuals were held in high esteem and honor for their care of orphaned children there.
Straight guys dont want sex with other males old, young or infant- that is the very definition of straight.
Actually, if you recall the song ... "My Buddy, My Buddy .. your Buddy misses you...." you'll find that it's a song about heterosexual males in wartime.
In our US prisons we have 200,000 male on male rapes every year ... certainly NOT by homosexuals who are most frequently the victims. And what studies show is that immediately upon release from prison these men will rape a woman ... "in order to prove their manhood."
So likely, many of the victims are also heterosexual.
Think you had best also dig up some LINKS as to what you're reporting.
It's pretty clear that you don't like the studies and statistics .... but clearly MALES are our sexual abusers of children. Freud knew this long ago but liked to the public -- and presently Freud, himself, is under suspicion of being a pedophile. At that time, it was well understood by FREUD (from his victims/both male and female) that those who had sexually abused them in their childhood were fathers, grandfathers, uncles, male cousins and male friends of the family. Most of them likely to be heterosexual.
By the way, aside from the point you're trying to make ... your math stinks ... :)
The "promiscuous gay life style" seems largely fiction to demean and degrade homosexuals. However, certainly they had to seek out lovers in secret -- fearful of any encounter with another male. Let's remember, it was highly dangerous for these men (and women) who were regularly beaten and often murdered because of their sexual orientation. All in the name of "Christianity," actually.
Haven't really been able to see or read anything more of David Shurter who seems to be some kind of a journalist. But I'll keep him in mind for further review. So is Shurter himself saying he also had 1000's of sexual partners ... or that he was just in those places reporting on what was happening? Did he watch these activities out in the open?
Presume you are Australian ... I'm here in US ...
And ... Catholic Church certainly active in both nations ... and very much a part of the story of sexual abuse of children, both here in US and in Australia.
(I've loved some of the Australian movies on the RCC -- think one was "Brides of Christ" ... ?? It's also an amazing story of Australian families and women. :)
Studies seem conclusive on this issue -- but obviously it isn't a subject that the powers that be want explored in any very specific ways.
Nor do they want to discuss bi-sexuality.
Just think of it -- most people in the population (parents) haven't even been told that it is MALES who are our sexual abusers of children.
Here's one study you might want to review ....
And note that pretty much no lesbian has ever been found sexually abusing a child.
QUOTE .........................
*Footnote 65 -- p.123