Hell, even people I thought were woke, are buying to Corey Feldman bullshit and opening their wallets to donate to a honeypot for "truth"... haha! GTFOH! Come on!!!
He's being handled to exploit himself to keep Weinstein/Hollywood relevant to YOU. In fact, his "number", very similar to a Patsy situation, was ONLY called because y'all teed him up for it without even realizing it. Before Weinstein, very few people had talked so candidly or detailed as Feldman, on the rampant sexual abuse happening to young Hollywood. Immediately after Weinstein broke, where was the first place Twitter, /pol/, Reddit, etc. went for more?! Corey Feldman and his buddy Haim.
Here's the timeline... (((they))) sacrificed Weinstein to distract y'all from everything else they knew was inevitable going to lead to all that's happening, right now. Then, (((they))) sat back and watched y'all drive the Weinstein chatter right to Corey Feldman, the unsung hero y'all made famous amongst yourselves again as the first unsung hero of pizzagate. Then, they tapped Feldman on the shoulder, told him he's going to play along... and remember, it's all gotta look good for (you) right?! So theyvtell him to keep his mouth shut, reply to nothing, while they watch social media traffic/attention build and increase towards Corey's way for a week. Then, they let him tweet back. Vaguely at first, stringing you along, building you up and further diverting your attention/efforts while you wait in baited breath for scared, intimidated, abused Corey to give you the "truth" you've now, "long awaited.
DON'T GET ME WRONG! FELDMAN WAS HEINOUSLY ABUSED, so was Haim, but if you think that abuse is over or long gone, you're wrong... they're still abusing him today by using him like raw steak bait, for you hungry tigers.
view the rest of the comments →
Millennial_Falcon ago
I think what you mean to say is Feldman is a distraction, not a patsy. A patsy is someone (usually completely innocent) who takes the fall for a crime (Stephen Paddock, for example).
alphabravo ago
True, and thanks. I was using MA's description of him.
Are_we_sure ago
Question: How does this bit about tort law apply? Wikileaks published the material, not a third party. I believe what you cite is more along the lines of Youtube not being liable for the content of a certain video.
Also I just read the news article. Trump's lawyers are not protecting Wikileaks, they are protecting the Trump campaign because the Trump campaign are being sued, not Wikileaks.
ROY COCKRUM, ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. DONALD J. TRUMP FOR PRESIDENT, INC., Defendants
So these are lawyers defending their client.
alphabravo ago
And by doing this, they protect Assange and Wikileaks and, have no more grounds to request extradition.
Are_we_sure ago
For one, Assange is not in danger of extradition for merely publishing. He is danger for actual crimes.
Two, these are not government lawyers. This is private lawyers for a private corporation. This wouldn't affect anything.
alphabravo ago
One, which actual crimes?
Two, it matters not. It sets a precedent.
Three, it's humorous that you act as if anyone here gives a flying fuck what you think.
Are_we_sure ago
Three ......um you just replied to me. So somebody cares.
Assange and his legal team believe there is a sealed indictment in the US for espionage for the Chelsea Manning case.
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/05/julian-assange-attorney-indictment_n_3386793.html
If there is such an indictment that would mean the US Department of Justice convinced a grand jury that there is evidence that Assange was not just a passive publisher of information, but that Assange helped/encouraged Manning to steal the information in the first place.
He also jumped bail in Sweden and that arrest warrant is still active. UK police have said they would arrest him for this.