Hell, even people I thought were woke, are buying to Corey Feldman bullshit and opening their wallets to donate to a honeypot for "truth"... haha! GTFOH! Come on!!!
He's being handled to exploit himself to keep Weinstein/Hollywood relevant to YOU. In fact, his "number", very similar to a Patsy situation, was ONLY called because y'all teed him up for it without even realizing it. Before Weinstein, very few people had talked so candidly or detailed as Feldman, on the rampant sexual abuse happening to young Hollywood. Immediately after Weinstein broke, where was the first place Twitter, /pol/, Reddit, etc. went for more?! Corey Feldman and his buddy Haim.
Here's the timeline... (((they))) sacrificed Weinstein to distract y'all from everything else they knew was inevitable going to lead to all that's happening, right now. Then, (((they))) sat back and watched y'all drive the Weinstein chatter right to Corey Feldman, the unsung hero y'all made famous amongst yourselves again as the first unsung hero of pizzagate. Then, they tapped Feldman on the shoulder, told him he's going to play along... and remember, it's all gotta look good for (you) right?! So theyvtell him to keep his mouth shut, reply to nothing, while they watch social media traffic/attention build and increase towards Corey's way for a week. Then, they let him tweet back. Vaguely at first, stringing you along, building you up and further diverting your attention/efforts while you wait in baited breath for scared, intimidated, abused Corey to give you the "truth" you've now, "long awaited.
DON'T GET ME WRONG! FELDMAN WAS HEINOUSLY ABUSED, so was Haim, but if you think that abuse is over or long gone, you're wrong... they're still abusing him today by using him like raw steak bait, for you hungry tigers.
view the rest of the comments →
Redpilled_Canadian ago
I definitely agree Feldman is part of the bread and circus show. The only person we can trust is someone who provides us evidence, names, and starts pressing charges.
alphabravo ago
Makes one think. I'm starting to question Feldman more. As others were saying on the thread here about it yesterday, he'd be a helluva lot safer just saying who it is than waiting and sitting in the info. And 10m? Pff. Just say the names, it doesn't need a documentary, he simply needs to say 6 names. 30 seconds and for free. This could also save children who are in vulnerable positions right now.
lawrieraja ago
I think Corey knows firsthand (from him going to the police in 1993) that one voice can easily be squashed and/or discredited. He has names but if he just up and names them then I think its a lot easier for the other side to go into damage control mode by launching the offensive against Corey. They would rather be the ones planting stories and controlling the narrative and I think that the way Corey has been handling it has essentially forced them to play defense instead - and anticipating Corey or trying to be reactionary to his innuendo is a lot riskier/uncertain for them because its a situation they know they cannot completely control.
I don't really see it as him trying to remain relevant by dragging it out or asking for money...I think he's looking for affirmation that a critical mass of the public will stand beside him so that what he divulges would not end up being for naught.
Cara_C ago
The whole world is paying attention to Hollywood corruption due to the Harvey Weinstein scandal. If Corey Feldman intended to and was at liberty to expose the pedophiles, he could do it within minutes on Twitter and the world would pay attention.
If he wanted to do something more elaborate, he could do it in a week or two. He could hire a lawyer and arrange a press conference, call together any other victims or witnesses willing to speak and name names, take a video of the event, and post it online. He could use this platform to raise money to encourage other victims to come forward, to take these revelations to the next step and for security and legal defense.
The idea that he has to raise $10 million and make a movie first, while supposedly ruthless and powerful predators stand by helplessly wringing their hands as he openly works to expose them, makes no sense to me.
lawrieraja ago
Right because we, the public, were so amenable to his claims when he spoke out on national talk shows LIVE ON VIDEO over a period of YEARS condemning the abuse in the most sincere, blunt of terms? Because we, the public, lapped up his book in 2013 and DEMANDED answers to this injustice instead of joining our fellow gossip-hounds to revel in the TMZ-fueled stories of his fall from grace with Corey's Angels?
Corey's statute of limitations has run out for his personal accusers and because of that, any claims he makes would be subject to frivolous libel suits from his accusers, on the basis that they are claims that would no longer be able to be legally validated through law enforcement and criminal investigation. Remember Michael Egan and his lawsuits against Bryan Singer (among others) "crumbling" as his lawyers turned on him, sold him out, and subjected him to fraud lawsuits forcing him to plead guilty and pay hundreds of thousands of dollars to avoid JAIL TIME?? Because HE was the one ABUSED?!
Don't delude yourself for one second for thinking that because YOU are now woke, that the well-oiled mechanisms THAT HAVE ALWAYS been in place to deal with these accusations and those making the accusations, have suddenly dried up.
Like I said, this isn't about the $10M. Heck some of the big budget films have larger coke budgets than this. If 10 rich guys gave $1M apiece to reach the funding goal, what does that tell you? Well, it tells you that 10 rich guys want a documentary, but nothing about the level of REAL support you have nor the prospects of your success in disseminating your story (because it's then controlled by small numbers). But, if one out of every 6-7 people in the country that diligently subscribe to Netflix (65M) every month were to give ONE DOLLAR, ONE SINGLE TIME then that tells you the VOLUME of interest has reached critical mass.
Asking someone to open their wallet is the ultimate gauge of interest and ACTIVE public support. Anyone can sit on a computer and 'like' posts on social media - it's safe, it's passive. You demand names now but if he names them and gets skewered by the media, like he has so often before, will you be the one running to stand at his side? Or will you just decry the perceived miscarriage of justice and move on to the next?
You complain about him not naming names but there are THOUSANDS, maybe TENS OF THOUSANDS, who, for one reason or another, have remained silent on this EXACT issue of pedophilia. Some are dead. Most just washed out, forgotten from the world for good. Does it really help the cause to pre-emptively bash the ONE PERSON who is actually doing what he believes is the SOMETHING he actually has to give??
As soon as we turn on the abused we become part of the problem. So just give $1.00 and be part of the solution and stop complaining about the fact that we live in a transactional society, which HE DIDN'T CREATE.
crazy_eyes ago
Thou dost protest too much
alphabravo ago
Very valid points. Thanks for this.
mooteensy ago
Either he is still making money off of his abuser(s) or he is just as vile as the people that abused him now. Ugh.