You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

TruthEarthOrg ago

The episode is about a man who goes around raping 'chickens'. I couldn't help but think that the South Park writers were trying to convey this terminology back when this episode was created. It could be a coincidence though. However, let us not forget the episode of South Park where 'The Super Adventure Club' that brainwashed the character 'Chef' was a bunch of old men going around the world raping kids for their energy...

Oldno7 ago

They were also one of the first to expose NAMBLA in the episode Cartman joins NAMBLA.

Magonia ago

Someone was just streaming that episode on YouTube yesterday and I remember the part where the kids were like “we’re all about love and equality and all that crap, but you fuck kids, seriously dude, fuck you”

I remember reading something a long time ago about the creators connections to Columbine and even Jonbenet. It really is a small world...

StSimonTrentPray4Us ago

The Columbine kids had a sodomite pedophile older "friend" in the neighborhood that gave them alcohol etc. They were also devout darwinists and did the crime on hitler's bday. Trey Parker was interviewed about this event on Bowling for Columbine and he nor Michael Moore went anywhere close to these issues.

eagleshigh ago

They were also devout darwinists

You say this as if it's a problem. @crensch

StSimonTrentPray4Us ago

Yes, the british invasion of this godless ideology is a great threat to our Constitutional government which affrims that our rights come from our Creator. Nothing good has come from that stupid grotesch and morbid ideology. Just child and baby skulls are are the fruits of darwinism.

eagleshigh ago

Nothing good has come from that stupid grotesch and morbid ideology

Nothing good has come from Darwinism? Bold claim. Also wrong.

Yes. Knowing that all life shares a common origin is "nothing good [coming] from this stupid and grotesque ideology"? What's" stupid and grotesque" about it?

Just child and baby skulls are are the fruits of darwinism.

This is retarded.

@crensch

StSimonTrentPray4Us ago

People with an extra chromosome are "retarded". You're just further refuting your own stupid ideology.

eagleshigh ago

People with an extra chromosome are "retarded".

Meaningless to this conversation.

You're just further refuting your own stupid ideology.

Quote me on how I further refuted my "own stupid ideology."

@crensch

StSimonTrentPray4Us ago

You're welcome to reject the Creator like Marx, Mao, Lenin etc. Marx loved darwin's book. Charlie married his cousin btw and lemented about his child probably which died as a result of his racist inbreeding darwinism. Sad! There are plenty of godless countries to take you and your stupid ideology in. Here are rights come from our Creator. Please respect that.

eagleshigh ago

So you're strawmanning me. Good job. Are you saying that evolutionism is wrong? Charles Darwin married his cousin, therefore his theory is wrong? Mao, Marx and Lenin liked Darwin's books and were godless, therefore Darwinism refuted? Lol

@crensch

StSimonTrentPray4Us ago

Those are the fruits of Darwinism. It just gives you an idea of how good it is. Alternatively Bible toting Christians moved into the desolate Great Plains and turned it into a food basket for the world. Those were good fruits. The Constitution was also a fruit of Creationism. Judge for yourself. Take a second look at it. Read up on what the people you mock and despise have to say. Maybe they have some points and you're ugly mocking attitude is not about you, but about the godless ideology you're trying to accommodate. Give it a shot for a week. You can always return to darwinism like how dogs return to their vomit.

antiracist ago

It doesn't matter how motivational creationism was for our constitution, and it doesn't matter how big of a faggot @eagleshigh is for sucking the cock of Charles Darwin and Hitler; you do not need God to establish human rights. That is, even if God exists and is the source of our human rights, he need not be. If there were no God, you could construct human rights without him. Eagleshigh is dumb because he doesn't read Nagel, goy.

@bojangles @sarmegahhikkitha

StSimonTrentPray4Us ago

The Founders were not judeo-Christian. No 'jews' signed the Declaration of Independance. 'Jews' contributed zero. None of the Founders wore yamikas, spun dretals or sacrificed children to their babylonian molech god. They studied the just the Christian values, schools and congregations most all thier lives. They also fought the muhammadists who saw them as kaffir.

antiracist ago

who cares

StSimonTrentPray4Us ago

Children.

antiracist ago

You don't need God for human rights.

StSimonTrentPray4Us ago

UN and Planned Parenthood would agree with that position.

antiracist ago

I don't care who agrees with the proposition. It is true.

StSimonTrentPray4Us ago

Christ is True.

antiracist ago

So is the proposition that you don't need God to construct human rights.

StSimonTrentPray4Us ago

Who are you sleeping with?

antiracist ago

Ladies.

StSimonTrentPray4Us ago

Pick one and marry her. We can chat after.

antiracist ago

No.

StSimonTrentPray4Us ago

Thanks for the chat. Cheers.