The episode is about a man who goes around raping 'chickens'. I couldn't help but think that the South Park writers were trying to convey this terminology back when this episode was created. It could be a coincidence though. However, let us not forget the episode of South Park where 'The Super Adventure Club' that brainwashed the character 'Chef' was a bunch of old men going around the world raping kids for their energy...
Someone was just streaming that episode on YouTube yesterday and I remember the part where the kids were like “we’re all about love and equality and all that crap, but you fuck kids, seriously dude, fuck you”
I remember reading something a long time ago about the creators connections to Columbine and even Jonbenet. It really is a small world...
The Columbine kids had a sodomite pedophile older "friend" in the neighborhood that gave them alcohol etc. They were also devout darwinists and did the crime on hitler's bday. Trey Parker was interviewed about this event on Bowling for Columbine and he nor Michael Moore went anywhere close to these issues.
Yes, the british invasion of this godless ideology is a great threat to our Constitutional government which affrims that our rights come from our Creator. Nothing good has come from that stupid grotesch and morbid ideology. Just child and baby skulls are are the fruits of darwinism.
Nothing good has come from that stupid grotesch and morbid ideology
Nothing good has come from Darwinism? Bold claim. Also wrong.
Yes. Knowing that all life shares a common origin is "nothing good [coming] from this stupid and grotesque ideology"? What's" stupid and grotesque" about it?
Just child and baby skulls are are the fruits of darwinism.
You're welcome to reject the Creator like Marx, Mao, Lenin etc. Marx loved darwin's book. Charlie married his cousin btw and lemented about his child probably which died as a result of his racist inbreeding darwinism. Sad! There are plenty of godless countries to take you and your stupid ideology in. Here are rights come from our Creator. Please respect that.
You're welcome to reject the Creator like Marx, Mao, Lenin etc. Marx loved darwin's book.
Marx was Jewish and loved communism.
The other two weren't human, either.
Charlie married his cousin btw and lemented about his child probably which died as a result of his racist inbreeding darwinism.
How is that relevant to anything? Poe did the same thing, but that doesn't mean his literature is garbage.
Sad! There are plenty of godless countries to take you and your stupid ideology in. Here are rights come from our Creator.
Your creator is a sad fiction that weak individuals tell themselves to feel better about not actually making a difference in the grand scheme of things. It's a narcissistic vanity of epic proportions.
So you're strawmanning me. Good job. Are you saying that evolutionism is wrong? Charles Darwin married his cousin, therefore his theory is wrong? Mao, Marx and Lenin liked Darwin's books and were godless, therefore Darwinism refuted? Lol
Sar, your God is a lie. I challenge you to a debate on prime moverism and I'll mop the floor with ya. What's that? You want me to find God through faith? God knows the rules I'll play by. Reason or bust.
Then what would we debate? You can't prove using logic what falls out of the Prime Mover. According to you the Prime Mover has no Will, so He never created this fake reality. It's not even really clear to me why illusory reality would even need to a creator.
So why couldn't the Prime Mover have intrinsic love for Himself and be motivated to create us? If He can't have Will then I can't have Will, it's only an illusion, only He's real.
According to you, you're God, so you must know you think and what you think about First Way. But if the Infinite is God, Will and Thought have "real" existence insofar as they exist in potentia in a mathetically perfect being, therefore they're concrete.
Those are the fruits of Darwinism. It just gives you an idea of how good it is. Alternatively Bible toting Christians moved into the desolate Great Plains and turned it into a food basket for the world. Those were good fruits. The Constitution was also a fruit of Creationism. Judge for yourself. Take a second look at it. Read up on what the people you mock and despise have to say. Maybe they have some points and you're ugly mocking attitude is not about you, but about the godless ideology you're trying to accommodate. Give it a shot for a week. You can always return to darwinism like how dogs return to their vomit.
Maybe they have some points and you're ugly mocking attitude is not about you, but about the godless ideology you're trying to accommodate.
They don't have any points. The Jewish religion gave us nothing but a belief system to crowd around in general - something that separated us from "those other religions".
The science of modern civilization happened in spite of stupid religious belief systems, not because of them.
The modern University system (note uni-verse) was constructed by the Holy Roman Catholic Church. Galeo was off his rocker and thought the entire universe revolved around the sun. Slap on the wrist with house arrest was for his own good. I have not read this book so its impolite to recommend it, however I have heard very good things.
I would encourage you to at least crack it open. https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/313011.How_the_Catholic_Church_Built_Western_Civilization
The modern University system (note uni-verse) was constructed by the Holy Roman Catholic Church.
The majority of literate people during the dark ages were priests and nobles. Your point?
Galeo was off his rocker and thought the entire universe revolved around the sun.
Your point?
Slap on the wrist with house arrest was for his own good. I have not read this book so its impolite to recommend it, however I have heard very good things.
"I can't argue this point, but let me tell you to read something so that I can pretend I'm right still without doing any work - YOU, however, have to do lots of reading because I AM SO SMART I hand-waved you to a book."
I'm not trying to but heads with you. If you prefer to read what google and amazon recommends, fine. Iron sharpens iron, and I'm not trying to bring you down, or something. Trying to help. You have your freewill. Have a nice day.
Iron sharpens Iron, but your own arguments are like wet noodles.
I'll say this, I really have no desire to fight with the christians right now, as I've got much bigger fish to fry.
Y'all are less of a danger to me and my life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness than kikes, niggers, sandniggers, and spics. As such, I've been more or less letting you all have your say.
If you want a fight, keep taking pot shots at those of us that reject not just your god, but all gods. I can promise that I'll beat you at every resolution - scripture, interpretations, facts, logic, internal consistency, external consistency, provenance, canon...
As knowledgeable as I've become about Jews and their bullshit in the past year, that's nothing compared to the 14 years I spent debating christians; while I may be a bit rusty, I can just about guarantee that you'll wind up losing your faith.
If you don't want that, keep your attacks directed towards someone that is actually a danger to your lifestyle. I'll be here to give you satisfaction when the dust clears and our true enemies are all dead.
It doesn't matter how motivational creationism was for our constitution, and it doesn't matter how big of a faggot @eagleshigh is for sucking the cock of Charles Darwin and Hitler; you do not need God to establish human rights. That is, even if God exists and is the source of our human rights, he need not be. If there were no God, you could construct human rights without him. Eagleshigh is dumb because he doesn't read Nagel, goy.
I think natural rights require God, but legal rights don't. You could argue that our founding fathers gave us better legal rights due to their belief in natural rights, but even then, the law remains arbitrary. And there's nothing wrong with that; all law is arbitrary.
The term "human rights" seems like it applies to everyone on the planet, so I don't see that happening unless we end up with some AI or space alien king that is somewhat benevolent, keeps its promises, and rules the entire world with an iron fist (since the people most likely to violate your rights are non-government actors). But this assumes that rights need to be enforceable. If they don't need to be, then we already have the laughable UN Declaration of Human Rights. Mission accomplished!
Rights are invisible things, like moral obligations. Regardless of enforcement, people have moral obligations. Regardless of actualization in society, people have rights.
The Founders were not judeo-Christian. No 'jews' signed the Declaration of Independance. 'Jews' contributed zero. None of the Founders wore yamikas, spun dretals or sacrificed children to their babylonian molech god. They studied the just the Christian values, schools and congregations most all thier lives. They also fought the muhammadists who saw them as kaffir.
view the rest of the comments →
TruthEarthOrg ago
The episode is about a man who goes around raping 'chickens'. I couldn't help but think that the South Park writers were trying to convey this terminology back when this episode was created. It could be a coincidence though. However, let us not forget the episode of South Park where 'The Super Adventure Club' that brainwashed the character 'Chef' was a bunch of old men going around the world raping kids for their energy...
Oldno7 ago
They were also one of the first to expose NAMBLA in the episode Cartman joins NAMBLA.
Magonia ago
Someone was just streaming that episode on YouTube yesterday and I remember the part where the kids were like “we’re all about love and equality and all that crap, but you fuck kids, seriously dude, fuck you”
I remember reading something a long time ago about the creators connections to Columbine and even Jonbenet. It really is a small world...
StSimonTrentPray4Us ago
The Columbine kids had a sodomite pedophile older "friend" in the neighborhood that gave them alcohol etc. They were also devout darwinists and did the crime on hitler's bday. Trey Parker was interviewed about this event on Bowling for Columbine and he nor Michael Moore went anywhere close to these issues.
eagleshigh ago
You say this as if it's a problem. @crensch
StSimonTrentPray4Us ago
Yes, the british invasion of this godless ideology is a great threat to our Constitutional government which affrims that our rights come from our Creator. Nothing good has come from that stupid grotesch and morbid ideology. Just child and baby skulls are are the fruits of darwinism.
eagleshigh ago
Nothing good has come from Darwinism? Bold claim. Also wrong.
Yes. Knowing that all life shares a common origin is "nothing good [coming] from this stupid and grotesque ideology"? What's" stupid and grotesque" about it?
This is retarded.
@crensch
StSimonTrentPray4Us ago
People with an extra chromosome are "retarded". You're just further refuting your own stupid ideology.
eagleshigh ago
Meaningless to this conversation.
Quote me on how I further refuted my "own stupid ideology."
@crensch
StSimonTrentPray4Us ago
You're welcome to reject the Creator like Marx, Mao, Lenin etc. Marx loved darwin's book. Charlie married his cousin btw and lemented about his child probably which died as a result of his racist inbreeding darwinism. Sad! There are plenty of godless countries to take you and your stupid ideology in. Here are rights come from our Creator. Please respect that.
Crensch ago
Marx was Jewish and loved communism.
The other two weren't human, either.
How is that relevant to anything? Poe did the same thing, but that doesn't mean his literature is garbage.
Your creator is a sad fiction that weak individuals tell themselves to feel better about not actually making a difference in the grand scheme of things. It's a narcissistic vanity of epic proportions.
eagleshigh ago
So you're strawmanning me. Good job. Are you saying that evolutionism is wrong? Charles Darwin married his cousin, therefore his theory is wrong? Mao, Marx and Lenin liked Darwin's books and were godless, therefore Darwinism refuted? Lol
@crensch
antiracist ago
Hey faggot, how's Nagel. Nah, argue like shitheads about if evolution is real. Fuck you eagleshigh.
@bojangles @sarmegahhikkitha
Sar, your God is a lie. I challenge you to a debate on prime moverism and I'll mop the floor with ya. What's that? You want me to find God through faith? God knows the rules I'll play by. Reason or bust.
Fuck you eagleshigh.
SarMegahhikkitha ago
You said my God allows rapes to happen, meaning the prime mover is my God. And why would I debate a fake person?
antiracist ago
Because you subscribe to prime moverism.
@eagleshigh @bojangles
SarMegahhikkitha ago
Then what would we debate? You can't prove using logic what falls out of the Prime Mover. According to you the Prime Mover has no Will, so He never created this fake reality. It's not even really clear to me why illusory reality would even need to a creator.
antiracist ago
Why didn't you take up my challenge?
@eagleshigh @bojangles
SarMegahhikkitha ago
You're not real
antiracist ago
Answer about the prime mover premise. Come on.
@eagleshigh @bojangles
SarMegahhikkitha ago
First prove to me you're not just an illusion.
Then prove to me why I should have a desire to answer when desire is illusory.
Then answer me: what doth life?
antiracist ago
I think therefore I am.
Desire is action with expectation of reward. Action for intrinsic love is acceptable. Philosophy is for its own sake.
Baby don't hurt me, don't hurt me, no more.
@eagleshigh @bojangles
SarMegahhikkitha ago
So why couldn't the Prime Mover have intrinsic love for Himself and be motivated to create us? If He can't have Will then I can't have Will, it's only an illusion, only He's real.
antiracist ago
Because creation requires potential, and God is pure act. Potential doesn't exist.
@eagleshigh @bojangles
SarMegahhikkitha ago
Then creation doesn't exist so I don't exist.
antiracist ago
You, God, exists.
SarMegahhikkitha ago
I, God, don't argue with myself.
antiracist ago
Does God think? What does God think of First Way?
@eagleshigh @bojangles
SarMegahhikkitha ago
According to you, you're God, so you must know you think and what you think about First Way. But if the Infinite is God, Will and Thought have "real" existence insofar as they exist in potentia in a mathetically perfect being, therefore they're concrete.
antiracist ago
Then I could suicide bc I have a backup copy in God.
antiracist ago
Shut up.
Antiracist2 ago
There is no prime mover. The topic of debate is the premise that anything which changes is changed by another. https://voat.co/v/Theology/2141534
That premise is false.
You have the intellectual obligation to argue for its truth, given your belief in prime moverism.
I have the intellectual obligation to argue for its falsity, given my lack of belief in prime moverism.
Have at it.
@eagleshigh fag.
@bojangles cool.
Nagel goy.
@crensch is a fucking idiot. eagleshigh you should stop pinging him.
StSimonTrentPray4Us ago
Those are the fruits of Darwinism. It just gives you an idea of how good it is. Alternatively Bible toting Christians moved into the desolate Great Plains and turned it into a food basket for the world. Those were good fruits. The Constitution was also a fruit of Creationism. Judge for yourself. Take a second look at it. Read up on what the people you mock and despise have to say. Maybe they have some points and you're ugly mocking attitude is not about you, but about the godless ideology you're trying to accommodate. Give it a shot for a week. You can always return to darwinism like how dogs return to their vomit.
Crensch ago
They don't have any points. The Jewish religion gave us nothing but a belief system to crowd around in general - something that separated us from "those other religions".
The science of modern civilization happened in spite of stupid religious belief systems, not because of them.
StSimonTrentPray4Us ago
The modern University system (note uni-verse) was constructed by the Holy Roman Catholic Church. Galeo was off his rocker and thought the entire universe revolved around the sun. Slap on the wrist with house arrest was for his own good. I have not read this book so its impolite to recommend it, however I have heard very good things. I would encourage you to at least crack it open.
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/313011.How_the_Catholic_Church_Built_Western_Civilization
Crensch ago
The majority of literate people during the dark ages were priests and nobles. Your point?
Your point?
"I can't argue this point, but let me tell you to read something so that I can pretend I'm right still without doing any work - YOU, however, have to do lots of reading because I AM SO SMART I hand-waved you to a book."
@eagleshigh
StSimonTrentPray4Us ago
I'm not trying to but heads with you. If you prefer to read what google and amazon recommends, fine. Iron sharpens iron, and I'm not trying to bring you down, or something. Trying to help. You have your freewill. Have a nice day.
Crensch ago
Iron sharpens Iron, but your own arguments are like wet noodles.
I'll say this, I really have no desire to fight with the christians right now, as I've got much bigger fish to fry.
Y'all are less of a danger to me and my life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness than kikes, niggers, sandniggers, and spics. As such, I've been more or less letting you all have your say.
If you want a fight, keep taking pot shots at those of us that reject not just your god, but all gods. I can promise that I'll beat you at every resolution - scripture, interpretations, facts, logic, internal consistency, external consistency, provenance, canon...
As knowledgeable as I've become about Jews and their bullshit in the past year, that's nothing compared to the 14 years I spent debating christians; while I may be a bit rusty, I can just about guarantee that you'll wind up losing your faith.
If you don't want that, keep your attacks directed towards someone that is actually a danger to your lifestyle. I'll be here to give you satisfaction when the dust clears and our true enemies are all dead.
@eagleshigh
antiracist ago
It doesn't matter how motivational creationism was for our constitution, and it doesn't matter how big of a faggot @eagleshigh is for sucking the cock of Charles Darwin and Hitler; you do not need God to establish human rights. That is, even if God exists and is the source of our human rights, he need not be. If there were no God, you could construct human rights without him. Eagleshigh is dumb because he doesn't read Nagel, goy.
@bojangles @sarmegahhikkitha
Bojangles ago
I think natural rights require God, but legal rights don't. You could argue that our founding fathers gave us better legal rights due to their belief in natural rights, but even then, the law remains arbitrary. And there's nothing wrong with that; all law is arbitrary.
The term "human rights" seems like it applies to everyone on the planet, so I don't see that happening unless we end up with some AI or space alien king that is somewhat benevolent, keeps its promises, and rules the entire world with an iron fist (since the people most likely to violate your rights are non-government actors). But this assumes that rights need to be enforceable. If they don't need to be, then we already have the laughable UN Declaration of Human Rights. Mission accomplished!
antiracist ago
Law isn't arbitrary.
Rights are invisible things, like moral obligations. Regardless of enforcement, people have moral obligations. Regardless of actualization in society, people have rights.
@eagleshigh @sarmegahhikkitha
Hay eaglesdyke why don't you tell me how the existence of rights falls out of Darwinism.
antiracist ago
re:bowl
lyke dys if u cry everytyme
banned from the forum you posted it to
ahahaha, banned from this one too
StSimonTrentPray4Us ago
The Founders were not judeo-Christian. No 'jews' signed the Declaration of Independance. 'Jews' contributed zero. None of the Founders wore yamikas, spun dretals or sacrificed children to their babylonian molech god. They studied the just the Christian values, schools and congregations most all thier lives. They also fought the muhammadists who saw them as kaffir.
antiracist ago
who cares
StSimonTrentPray4Us ago
Children.
antiracist ago
You don't need God for human rights.
StSimonTrentPray4Us ago
UN and Planned Parenthood would agree with that position.
antiracist ago
I don't care who agrees with the proposition. It is true.
StSimonTrentPray4Us ago
Christ is True.
antiracist ago
So is the proposition that you don't need God to construct human rights.
StSimonTrentPray4Us ago
Who are you sleeping with?
antiracist ago
Ladies.
StSimonTrentPray4Us ago
Pick one and marry her. We can chat after.
antiracist ago
No.
StSimonTrentPray4Us ago
Thanks for the chat. Cheers.