Why don't you explain why the kids were full of fresh cuts and bruises when they were examined by the doctor when the hadn't seen their father for three months
Oh right, you can't because then you would have to admit that Abraham Christie beat and tortured.those kids to make them say the things they did (which they admitted was the true story after the police investigated some of their claims and found them to be bullshit), and all the while the mother stood by and let him do that to them.
Or what about his past history of violence against his own children and hospitalizing his wife. Or the child porn found on his phone. Or that it was found he had drugged the kids. Or that the boy is now deaf in one ear because he punched him so hard there.
But you never want to talk about those things do you?
None of your obfuscation obscured from the fact a paediatrician confirmed sexual abuse FROM THEIR FATHER.
Nor the fact Ricky Dearman has NON-MOLESTATION ORDERS for ABUSING THE CHILDREN'S MOTHER IN FRONT OF THEM. Which he admitted on the BBC.
No she didn't. Why don't you explain why her peers pulled her up on using a technique that was discredited 25 years earlier because it was not proof of abuse and she had to change her original diagnosis?
And again, please explain how the kids had FRESH cuts and bruises on them when they hadn't been in touch with their father for three months and spent all their recent weeks in Morocco with AC and the mother?
Also, why are they both on the run? They know the police can't touch AC for the abuse he inflicted upon the children in Morrocco because it occurred in another country, but they can do him for the child porn found on his phone.
So please, change the subject again, come up with more bs accustations against me and ignore these important questions yet again. You only show yourself up as either a) the real abuser of the children or b) someone who supports him.
I would prefer a criminal trial took place in a criminal court, where the accused were examined for identifying marks to confirm or quash the children's allegations, since tattoos aren't easily gotten rid off at short notice. In a criminal court with a jury of public peers to cast judgement over the facts of the case. Do you think that's unreasonable?
You are insane. You know fine well Ricky Dearman told Alissa to put porn on the phone.
Care to explain why even in the retraction video, Alissa admitted to looking at hardcore pornography with a friend, daughter of the BBC member, when that little girl was never questioned herself for follow up? Is it normal for 6 year olds to have access to hardcore pornography? Is that the liberal attitude of most parents at the BBC is it? We know it certainly is in MADA VALE studios isn't it?
We know EXACTLY what they are all getting up to and it's about to be put to rest.
Oh stop talking bollocks and repeating the same old shit and just admit you are a sick and deluded pervert, Abraham. You know all the technical details of where and when that child porn on your phone came from can be proven in court. That's why you are still on the run.
view the rest of the comments →
norobotono ago
Why don't you explain why the kids were full of fresh cuts and bruises when they were examined by the doctor when the hadn't seen their father for three months
Oh right, you can't because then you would have to admit that Abraham Christie beat and tortured.those kids to make them say the things they did (which they admitted was the true story after the police investigated some of their claims and found them to be bullshit), and all the while the mother stood by and let him do that to them.
Or what about his past history of violence against his own children and hospitalizing his wife. Or the child porn found on his phone. Or that it was found he had drugged the kids. Or that the boy is now deaf in one ear because he punched him so hard there.
But you never want to talk about those things do you?
LittlestHobo ago
Christine, why don't you explain to us all why you work for the CIA.
norobotono ago
So deluded that you even resort to accusing me of being someone that I am not and I have no idea who you are even referring to.
How about you address the things I brought up about AC in my original post?
Oh right - you can't with out admitting he is a child abuser!
LittlestHobo ago
None of your obfuscation obscured from the fact a paediatrician confirmed sexual abuse FROM THEIR FATHER. Nor the fact Ricky Dearman has NON-MOLESTATION ORDERS for ABUSING THE CHILDREN'S MOTHER IN FRONT OF THEM. Which he admitted on the BBC.
norobotono ago
No she didn't. Why don't you explain why her peers pulled her up on using a technique that was discredited 25 years earlier because it was not proof of abuse and she had to change her original diagnosis?
And again, please explain how the kids had FRESH cuts and bruises on them when they hadn't been in touch with their father for three months and spent all their recent weeks in Morocco with AC and the mother?
Also, why are they both on the run? They know the police can't touch AC for the abuse he inflicted upon the children in Morrocco because it occurred in another country, but they can do him for the child porn found on his phone.
So please, change the subject again, come up with more bs accustations against me and ignore these important questions yet again. You only show yourself up as either a) the real abuser of the children or b) someone who supports him.
How does that make you feel?
LittlestHobo ago
"Despite The Confusing Picture, we must take the children's allegations very seriously"
Then let's take a look at the interviewer officer's conduct, shall we? https://vid.me/G2Svb
Let's consider the fact, the children's "retractions" WEREN'T CORROBORATIVE.
Let's consider the fact the church at the centre of this, allowed an |art| snuff band to perform there with choir boys singing Charles Manson Lyrics.
Really normal. Nice try Susan.
norobotono ago
So you prefer to pick pathetic holes in a police interview than address the very real damage done to the kids by AC?
BlahBlahBlahMoney ago
I would prefer a criminal trial took place in a criminal court, where the accused were examined for identifying marks to confirm or quash the children's allegations, since tattoos aren't easily gotten rid off at short notice. In a criminal court with a jury of public peers to cast judgement over the facts of the case. Do you think that's unreasonable?
norobotono ago
So why not show up at the court and stop running away and come out of hiding? Afraid they will arrest you for the child porn found on your phone?
BlahBlahBlahMoney ago
You are insane. You know fine well Ricky Dearman told Alissa to put porn on the phone.
Care to explain why even in the retraction video, Alissa admitted to looking at hardcore pornography with a friend, daughter of the BBC member, when that little girl was never questioned herself for follow up? Is it normal for 6 year olds to have access to hardcore pornography? Is that the liberal attitude of most parents at the BBC is it? We know it certainly is in MADA VALE studios isn't it?
We know EXACTLY what they are all getting up to and it's about to be put to rest.
norobotono ago
Oh stop talking bollocks and repeating the same old shit and just admit you are a sick and deluded pervert, Abraham. You know all the technical details of where and when that child porn on your phone came from can be proven in court. That's why you are still on the run.
BlahBlahBlahMoney ago
You have lost your mind lol.
<<where are they>>> <<echo>> <<echo>> <<they're here>>
norobotono ago
Fear is the mind killer eh Abraham? That's why you ran away like the cowardly pedo you are.
Can't be arsed paying you anymore of the attention you so desperately crave anymore.
BlahBlahBlahMoney ago
Gimme gimme your attention