The recent controversy over a fashion show with satanic symbology within a Christian church has once again thrown a spotlight on the dark history of London and links to pedophilia and rumoured satanism.
If you've been doing this long enough when stories like this come along you realize it's not an accident.
Church apologises for hosting satanic fashion show
St Andrew's Church in Holborn received criticism after it offered up its building as part of London fashion week on Monday evening.
The Anglican church's alter was transformed into a runway for models wearing inverted crosses, devil horns and vampire costumes to walk down in Turkish designer Dilara Findikoglu's Spring/Summer 2018 collection.
Of course Dilara Findikoglu has declared she's into the occult and here's Lady Gaga wearing one of her designs: https://imgur.com/a/Ib63Q
Well it seems that satanists also go by the mantra : Location, location, location. What's special about the church that this particular show was held in ? Here's the wikipedia background: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St_Andrew_Holborn_(church)
The medieval St Andrew's survived the 1666 Great Fire of London, saved by a last minute change in wind direction, but was already in a bad state of repair and so was rebuilt by Christopher Wren anyway. In what is his largest parish church, he rebuilt from the foundations (creating the present crypt) and gave the existing medieval stone tower (the only medieval part to survive) a marble cladding. Its rector from 1713 to 1724 was Henry Sacheverell, who is buried beneath the church's altar.
Thomas Coram, founder of the Foundlings' Hospital (first set up in a house in Hatton Garden) is also buried here, his remains were translated from his foundation in the 1960s. The organ casing (an organ played by Handel), the pulpit and the font is also from the Foundlings' Hospital Chapel's Bloomsbury site.
The same statues from the Foundling Hospital located in Hatton Garden are above the side door of St Andrew Holborn.
Hatton Garden 'has an extensive underground infrastructure of vaults, tunnels, offices and workshops'.
Well, the Foundling Hospital has quite a history https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foundling_Hospital
The Foundling Hospital in London, England was founded in 1739 by the philanthropic sea captain Thomas Coram. It was a children's home established for the "education and maintenance of exposed and deserted young children."
The Foundling Hospital grew to become a very fashionable charity, and it was supported by many noted figures of the day in high society and the arts. Its benefactors included a number of renowned artists, thanks to one of its most influential governors, the portrait painter and cartoonist William Hogarth.
Hogarth, who was childless, had a long association with the Hospital and was a founding governor. He designed the children's uniforms and the coat of arms, and he and his wife Jane fostered foundling children. Hogarth also decided to set up a permanent art exhibition in the new buildings, encouraging other artists to produce work for the hospital. By creating a public attraction, Hogarth turned the Hospital into one of London's most fashionable charities as visitors flocked to view works of art and make donations. At this time, art galleries were unknown in Britain, and Hogarth's fundraising initiative is considered to have established Britain's first ever public art gallery.
More on the history of the hospital: http://qi.com/infocloud/foundlings
But it seems that some academics think Hogarth may have been a paedophile (you knew that was coming, right?): https://muse.jhu.edu/article/464815
In Hogarth’s Hidden Parts, Bernd Krysmanski aims to turn the idea of the “good” Hogarth on its head. The author questions Hogarth’s moralizing agendas, his socially engaged and reformist identities, and argues instead that he was a “bawdy hedonist,” a malicious blasphemer, possibly even a pedophile.
And it seems that the founder of the hospital Thomas Coram has left quite a legacy in London today through the Thomas Coram research unit which has links with Tavistock:
To Abuse or Not to Abuse - The Systematic Negative Conditioning of Children by Social Services
We need to ask questions about the 800 children that have died in care in the last ten years, and the 100 children that died between August 2007 and May 2008. Im sorry malnutrition and disease just doesnt cut it, nor do the figures for that matter…
Figures that were read out in the house of commons, can we rely upon those or are they the tip of the iceberg, trust has been broken on multiple levels, social services, courts and the very same MP s we turn to for help and guidance. We dont know and wont know, until someone truly independent is allowed to walk talk and take note amongst the biggest criminal elements of our society, the social service departments, the corrupt family court gulags and the many flawed practices of cafcass and expert witnesses.
Laming can keep his nose out for once…
We should be asking why we have german pedagogues coming over to work in our care homes and why Thomas Coram research unit are piloting the very same programme across the country and their association with the Tavistock Institute…I could fill the page with these types of questions however, if we no longer trust the people that may offer answers then its a none starter….but who can blame us…
My children have participated in some of their studies. They were initially referred by a national indrependent advocacy organisation that helped my children. (they were given £5 vouchers for taking part)
Although I didn't realise the significance of it at the time, I will never forget the look on the CAFCASS officer's face when she heard the children were to be interviewed by researchers from Thomas Coram, she was worried!
and
Lets hope and pray that Tavistock and Anna Freud leave children intact and unaffected too.
Tavistock report in conjunction with Thomas Coram Research Unit: ‘Child Poverty Pilots’ for improved services for separating families
Quite the history, is it not ?
view the rest of the comments →
LittlestHobo ago
In the UK, there is currently an epidemic of child abuse, as many as one in ten children are being abused in the country. It's something I don't like to think about but it's a fact and something needs to be done about it.
In 2014, a video went viral on the internet. It was a video of two children detailing their abuse at the hands of a ritualistic cult centered in Hampstead, it was the most horrific thing most of us had ever seen and made a major impact on many people across the world.
The videos were leaked by one of the legal lay people of the mother, Sabine McNeil. Now it might surprise you to learn that Sabine is a CERN computer scientist, or at least she was before taking up this "lay" legal role. Her partner and head of the McKenzie Foundation is one - Belinda McKenzie, who publicly exposes the fact she allows MI5 agents to frequent her house.
The tricky thing in this situation is, as pointed out by Alfred Webre, is that by releasing those confidential video tapes, she could have prejudiced Ella's (the mother) right to an appeal. Not that, that mattered when it came down to the absolutely admonishable occurrences in a secret family court.
Despite criminal evidence recorded by a pediatrician that the children had indeed been abused, their hearing took place in secret and out of a criminal court...
Despite evidence of abuse, that the judge dismissed in favor of a Tavistock psychiatrist... Who is notorious online, as being responsible for the loss of multitudes of children to the corrupt CAFCASS/CORAM system, who have admitted on record to working with Tavistock, despite them being required by statute to be independent of government bodies etc.
Despite non-molestation orders against the father and his admitted perverted texts and abusive behaviour in front of the children, towards Ella - he should receive custody of the children? This judge, dismissed acts of incest and bestiality, recorded in her judgement, as being inconsequential - when in fact, all governmental and medical literature states the absolute contrary.
There is a video of when the police came to Ella's house, illegally... Fortunately she had a lawyer with her, who was able to keep the police at bay long enough, that Ella managed her escape. Why should several officers show up, illegally (without warrant) to "just speak" to Ella. I'm sorry but you can't "just speak" to people, when you are meant to be the ones upholding legal order! Also, you can't show up in order to intimidate a witness! Well clearly they can because that is exactly what they did.
Now we haven't even gotten onto the absolute monstrosity of an interview that the children were subjected by what one can only describe as pervert and disgrace to any concept of decency. Everyone who sees the video, comments on how disgusting his behavior is, everyone senses something is deeply wrong because it is.
The most heinous injustice we are witnessing taking place, to children.
Even if this all turned out to be a psy-op, I wouldn't care, I would be just as angry that anyone would ever dare put a child into that situation as a tool of evil. Sandyhook is one thing, this would be quite another.
The fact is, the officer does break the law admittedly while interviewing the child. He admits to discussing the case, without it being recorded, in the car. He leads the witness into reasoning she would not of reached herself and worse still, the children's "retractions" (several days later, when they had been separated from their mother) were not even corroborative.
The distinguishing marks identified on the bodies of their abusers, were never considered for investigation.
It should be noted, that Ricky Dearman (the father) runs several businesses which include high ranking members of the Church Of England, as well as The MET police.
It should be further noted, that there is a particular piece of evidence which had been banned from being spoken about on all forums I came across, including David Icke, God Like Productions and the rest. That piece of information is regarding the allowance of the The Christ Church, to allow a band to perform there, while having children in the choir singing Manson lyrics... The band is famed for making "snuff" films, of young men being castrated - as art, allegedly. As well as The Christ Church, it is interesting they should also choose The Crowley Hellfire Caves...
When the scandal broke, the school were caught deleting teachers from their records and adding new members of staff, surely this is not the actions of misaddressed?
The BBC interview featuring Ricky Dearman, saw the corners of his mouth turn in delight as he discussed accusations of diabolical gravity.
Of course, on queue, the media put out the same story over and over, without addressing any of the finer details such as the paediatrician confirmed the children were abused. or the fact the suspects were never formally examined, despite the fact the children identified tattoos which would immediately quash or confirm their accusations.
It should be further noted that Leon Britton a resident of Hampstead acussed of child abuse, was also identified by his victim by a tattoo, on his groin.
There is so much more to this case and I personally feel it is the one that if we all focused our energies upon it, could really see some change happening. As we have the documented evidence.
millennial_vulcan ago
Hampstead super Jewish. Where Freud lived and died too. Hampstead Heath where all gays go for dogging. (the rich and famous alike.)
Hampstead and Highgate have always been filled with the moneyed and whackos for thousands of years.