You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

RweSure ago

Why is this arrest illegal?

Honeybee_ ago

He is not severely mentally ill, he just spoke clearly and concisely on his video and also on all his videos and radio shows showing his apptitude and wanting love peace and justice, also, he is not mentally retarded and has not physically threatened himself or anyone else. In PA Law, unless those things are present and a medical administrator or director has proof of severe mental illness or a threat has been made, a warrant will not be issued.

EXAMINATION AND TREATMENT. § 7301. Persons who may be subject to involuntary emergency examination and treatment. § 7302. Involuntary emergency examination and treatment authorized by a physician-not to exceed one hundred twenty hours. § 7303. Extended involuntary emergency treatment certified by a judge or mental health review officer-not to exceed twenty days. § 7304. Court-ordered involuntary treatment not to exceed twenty days. § 7305. Additional periods of court-ordered involuntary treatment. § 7306. Transfer of persons in involuntary treatment. Excerpts: 7301. Persons who may be subject to involuntary emergency examination and treatment (a) Persons Subject. -- Whenever a person is severely mentally ill and in need of immediate treatment, he may be made subject to involuntary emergency examination and treatment. A person is severely mentally disabled when, as a result of mental illness, his capacity to exercise self-control, judgment and discretion in the conduct of his affairs and social relations or to care for his own personal needs is so lessened that he poses a clear and present danger of harm to others or to himself. (b) Determination of Clear and Present Danger. -- (1) Clear and present danger to others shall be shown by establishing that within the past 30 days the person has inflicted or attempted to inflict serious bodily harm on another and that there is a reasonable probability that such conduct will be repealed. If, however, the person has been found incompetent to be tried or has been acquitted by reason of lack of criminal responsibility all charges arising from conduct involving infliction of or attempt to inflict substantial bodily harm on another, such 30-day limitation shall not apply so long as an application for examination and treatment is filed within 30 days after the date of such determination or verdict. In such case, if clear and present danger to others may be shown by establishing that the conduct charged in the criminal proceeding did occur, and that there is a reasonable probability that such conduct will be repeated. For the purpose of this section, a clear and present danger of harm to others may be demonstrated by proof that the person has made threats of harm and has committed acts in furtherance of the threat to commit harm. (2) Clear and present danger to himself shall be shown by establishing that within the past 30 days: (i) the person has acted in such manner as to evidence that he would be unable, without care, supervision and the continued assistance of others, to satisfy his need for nourishment, personal or medical care, shelter. or self-protection and safety, and that there is a reasonable probability that death, serious bodily injury or serious physical debilitation would ensue within 30 days unless adequate treatment were afforded under this act; or (ii) the person has attempted suicide and that there is a reasonable probability of suicide unless adequate treatment is afforded under this act. For the purposes of this subsection, a clear and present danger may be demonstrated by the proof that the person has made threats to commit suicide aid bas committed acts which are in furtherance or the threat to commit suicide; or (iii) the person has substantially mutilated himself or attempted to mutilate himself substantially and that there is the reasonable probability of mutilation unless adequate treatment is afforded under this act. For the purposes of this subsection, a clear and present danger shall be established by proof that the person has made threats to commit mutilation and has committed acts which are in furtherance of the threat to commit mutilation.

RweSure ago

May vs Shall are very important when reading laws. You are talking about shall.

The law as written is May.

His case filings are the work of a crazy person.

equineluvr ago

"May vs Shall are very important when reading laws. You are talking about shall."

^^ ^THIS!! OP doesn't even know what an indictment is so has NO CLUE about legal matters and is incompetent to post about them.

Honeybee_ ago

Haha, keep going, it's fun to read your posts.

TrishaUK ago

Don't encourage him, he will 'keep going' his language will generally get fouler and fouler! Best response 'crickets' lol - Gee Honeybee, I was looking forward to your posts. I hope you don't get this retaliation every time you bring good information. Well you have been 'thrown in the deep end' on voat haha - you have proved you can swim! good job :D