It used to be that when you searched the web for Clinton and Comet Pizza ALL you saw was the growing evidence. So in order to control the narrative and build a protective moat around the now clear association between the two, their war strategy is to flood the internet with what we call "false positives" -- admitted half-truths that have thus far been working to stay safe.
Now they are betting on the Average Joes -- you know, the FUTURE POTENTIAL JURY -- will only see the admitted, innocent connections, blindly swallow what the MSM will feed them, and when it's time to find reasonable doubt -- and that time is near approaching -- it will be a slam dunk on appeal.
The truth is, this is why Voat has been flooded with more and more shill attacks. Not because they're winning, or kicking it up a notch, but because statistically there are less original researchers and investigators left here. Why? Because the Good ONES fast understood that while collective internet research is essential to expose the truth, it also sets up the legal system they puppet for the perfect modern day defense.
Sometimes you can do more harm when your aim is otherwise. That's why you check your facts. Twice.
Typical strawman argument in Huffpose: "the unsubstantiated claim that Clinton and Podesta had secretly run a child sex ring in the basement of the pizza place." Who ever claimed that? Every claim I ever saw alleged James was running it and sponsoring fundraisers for the DNC.
Imagine if they said something remotely close to that actual claims:
" the unsubstantiated claim that Comet was a front company for child trafficing hosting large fundraisers, alleged uncovering of Clinton's and Podesta's ties to spirit cooking, occultish rituals, pedophile code language and art works. "
view the rest of the comments →
HugoWeaving ago
THEIR STRATEGY: False Positives.
It used to be that when you searched the web for Clinton and Comet Pizza ALL you saw was the growing evidence. So in order to control the narrative and build a protective moat around the now clear association between the two, their war strategy is to flood the internet with what we call "false positives" -- admitted half-truths that have thus far been working to stay safe.
Now they are betting on the Average Joes -- you know, the FUTURE POTENTIAL JURY -- will only see the admitted, innocent connections, blindly swallow what the MSM will feed them, and when it's time to find reasonable doubt -- and that time is near approaching -- it will be a slam dunk on appeal.
The truth is, this is why Voat has been flooded with more and more shill attacks. Not because they're winning, or kicking it up a notch, but because statistically there are less original researchers and investigators left here. Why? Because the Good ONES fast understood that while collective internet research is essential to expose the truth, it also sets up the legal system they puppet for the perfect modern day defense.
Sometimes you can do more harm when your aim is otherwise. That's why you check your facts. Twice.
StSimonTrentPray4Us ago
Typical strawman argument in Huffpose: "the unsubstantiated claim that Clinton and Podesta had secretly run a child sex ring in the basement of the pizza place." Who ever claimed that? Every claim I ever saw alleged James was running it and sponsoring fundraisers for the DNC.
Imagine if they said something remotely close to that actual claims: " the unsubstantiated claim that Comet was a front company for child trafficing hosting large fundraisers, alleged uncovering of Clinton's and Podesta's ties to spirit cooking, occultish rituals, pedophile code language and art works. "
HugoWeaving ago
Yup. The only way to combat their war of words is to do the same. See my previous post on How to Properly Answer the Question: "Is Pizzagate Real?"
StSimonTrentPray4Us ago
Spot on. Good post, thanks for sharing!